Literature DB >> 27074748

Analytical Performance Evaluation of Infopia Element™ Auto-coding Blood Glucose Monitoring System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.

Hae-Il Park1,2, Seong-Su Lee3, Jang-Won Son3, Hee-Sun Kwon3, Sung Rae Kim3, Hyojin Chae4,2, Myungshin Kim4,2, Yonggoo Kim4,2, Soonjib Yoo5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Element™ Auto-coding Blood Glucose Monitoring System (BGMS; Infopia Co., Ltd., Anyang-si, Korea) was developed for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG).
METHODS: Precision, linearity, and interference were tested. Eighty-four capillary blood samples measured by Element™ BGMS were compared with central laboratory method (CLM) results in venous serum. Accuracy was evaluated using ISO 15197:2013 criteria.
RESULTS: Coefficients of variation (CVs; mean) were 2.4% (44.2 mg/dl), 3.7% (100.6 mg/dl), and 2.1% (259.8 mg/dl). Linearity was shown at concentrations 39.25-456.25 mg/l (y = 0.989 + 0.984x, SE = 17.63). Up to 15 mg/dl of galactose, ascorbic acid, and acetaminophen, interference > 10.4% was not observed. Element™ BGMS glucose was higher than CLM levels by 3.2 mg/dl (at 200 mg/dl) to 8.2 mg/dl (at 100 mg/dl). The minimum specification for bias (3.3%) was met at 140 and 200 mg/l glucose. In the Clarke and consensus error grids, 100% of specimens were within zone A and B. For Element™ BGMS values, 92.9% (78/84) to 94.0% (79/84) were within a 15 mg/dl (< 100 mg/dl) or 15% (> 100 mg/dl) of the average CLM value.
CONCLUSION: Element™ BGMS was considered an appropriate SMBG for home use; however, the positive bias at low-to-mid glucose levels requires further improvement.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accuracy; blood glucose monitoring system; evaluation; self-monitoring of blood glucose

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27074748      PMCID: PMC6806690          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.21947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of venous plasma glucose and capillary whole blood glucose in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a community-based study.

Authors:  Vijayam Balaji; Balaji S Madhuri; Arunachalam Paneerselvam; Thiyagarajah Arthi; Veerasamy Seshiah
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Standards of medical care in diabetes--2011.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 19.112

3.  The variability of results between point-of-care testing glucose meters and the central laboratory analyzer.

Authors:  Adil I Khan; Yolanda Vasquez; Jacquelyn Gray; Frank H Wians; Martin H Kroll
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 4.  What is blood glucose: can it be measured?

Authors:  J M Burrin; K G Alberti
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.359

5.  Retrospective evaluation of the accuracy of Roche AccuChek Inform and Nova StatStrip glucose meters when used on critically ill patients.

Authors:  Brad S Karon; Chanse T Blanshan; Gayle R Deobald; Amy M Wockenfus
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 6.118

6.  The accuracy of home glucose meters in hypoglycemia.

Authors:  Alper Sonmez; Zeynep Yilmaz; Gokhan Uckaya; Selim Kilic; Serkan Tapan; Abdullah Taslipinar; Aydogan Aydogdu; Mahmut Yazici; Mahmut Ilker Yilmaz; Muhittin Serdar; M Kemal Erbil; Mustafa Kutlu
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 6.118

7.  Tighter accuracy standards within point-of-care blood glucose monitoring: how six commonly used systems compare.

Authors:  Charlotte S Robinson; Patrick Sharp
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-05-01

8.  Comparison of capillary whole blood versus venous plasma glucose estimations in screening for diabetes mellitus in epidemiological studies in developing countries.

Authors:  Miranda Priya; Ranjit Mohan Anjana; Rajendra Pradeepa; Ramamurthy Jayashri; Mohan Deepa; Anil Bhansali; Viswanathan Mohan
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 6.118

9.  Comparison of POCT and central laboratory blood glucose results using arterial, capillary, and venous samples from MICU patients on a tight glycemic protocol.

Authors:  John R Petersen; Donna F Graves; Danyel H Tacker; Anthony O Okorodudu; Amin A Mohammad; Victor J Cardenas
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 10.  Glucose meters - fit for clinical purpose.

Authors:  Rosy Tirimacco; George Koumantakis; Rajiv Erasmus; Andrea Mosca; Sverre Sandberg; Ian D Watson; Barbara Goldsmith; Philippe Gillery
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessment of System Accuracy, Intermediate Measurement Precision, and Measurement Repeatability of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System Based on ISO 15197.

Authors:  Nina Jendrike; Annette Baumstark; Stefan Pleus; Jochen Mende; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-14

2.  Evaluation of Analytical Performance of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems: System Accuracy, Measurement Repeatability, and Intermediate Measurement Precision.

Authors:  Stefan Pleus; Nina Jendrike; Annette Baumstark; Jochen Mende; Cornelia Haug; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-10-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.