Literature DB >> 21992269

Comparison of venous plasma glucose and capillary whole blood glucose in the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a community-based study.

Vijayam Balaji1, Balaji S Madhuri, Arunachalam Paneerselvam, Thiyagarajah Arthi, Veerasamy Seshiah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is advocated in Indian women as they have the highest frequency of GDM among the South Asian population. For this the diagnostic procedure has to be simple, economical, and evidence based. Hence, this study was undertaken to compare point-of-care measured capillary whole blood glucose (CBG) with a glucometer and laboratory-estimated venous plasma glucose (VPG) and to suggest which is feasible as a diagnostic tool.
METHODS: Consecutive pregnant women in the third trimester were included in this study with the approval of the institutional ethical committee. They were given 75 g of oral glucose in the fasting state. After 2 h, CBG was measured by finger prick using an Accu-Chek(®) glucometer (Roche Diagnostics India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India), and venous blood was drawn to estimate VPG in the laboratory by the glucose oxidase-peroxidase method. The diagnosis of GDM was based on a 2-h plasma glucose level of ≥7.8 mmol/L (World Health Organization criteria).
RESULTS: Among 819 pregnant women, 86 (10.5%) were diagnosed as having GDM. The CBG value at a 2-h plasma glucose level of ≥7.8 mmol/L had a sensitivity of 80.2% and specificity of 98.5% with false-positive and false-negative rates of 1.5% and 19.8%, respectively. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of CBG was 0.991.
CONCLUSION: The CBG value at a 2-h plasma glucose level of ≥7.8 mmol/L may be recommended for the diagnosis of GDM in healthcare centers where laboratory technology is not available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21992269     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2011.0060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  13 in total

1.  Risk Factors and Plasma Glucose Profile of Gestational Diabetes in Omani Women.

Authors:  Havagiray R Chitme; Sumaiya Abdallah Said Al Shibli; Raya Mahmood Al-Shamiry
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2016-09

2.  Accuracy of capillary blood glucose for 50-g glucose challenge test for gestational diabetes screening.

Authors:  Dittakarn Boriboonhirunsarn; Amporn Robkhonburi; Maria Asad-Dehghan
Journal:  Diabetol Int       Date:  2022-02-07

Review 3.  Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katherine T Li; Shilpa Naik; Mallika Alexander; Jyoti S Mathad
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.280

4.  Analytical Performance Evaluation of Infopia Element™ Auto-coding Blood Glucose Monitoring System for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose.

Authors:  Hae-Il Park; Seong-Su Lee; Jang-Won Son; Hee-Sun Kwon; Sung Rae Kim; Hyojin Chae; Myungshin Kim; Yonggoo Kim; Soonjib Yoo
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  Strengthening diabetes management at primary health level.

Authors:  Sanjay Kalra; Sandeep Julka; Rajnish Joshi; Asha Shah; Sushil Jindal; Navneet Agrawal; A K Das
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

6.  Need for testing glucose tolerance in the early weeks of pregnancy.

Authors:  Seshiah Veeraswamy; Hema Divakar; Sanjay Gupte; Manjula Datta; Anil Kapur; Balaji Vijayam
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

7.  Screening for gestational diabetes in India: Where do we stand?

Authors:  V Mohan; S Usha; R Uma
Journal:  J Postgrad Med       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.476

Review 8.  The burden of diabetes mellitus during pregnancy in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lovney Kanguru; Navya Bezawada; Julia Hussein; Jacqueline Bell
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 2.640

9.  Use of capillary blood glucose for screening for gestational diabetes mellitus in resource-constrained settings.

Authors:  Balaji Bhavadharini; Manni Mohanraj Mahalakshmi; Kumar Maheswari; Gunasekaran Kalaiyarasi; Ranjit Mohan Anjana; Mohan Deepa; Harish Ranjani; Miranda Priya; Ram Uma; Sriram Usha; Sonak D Pastakia; Belma Malanda; Anne Belton; Ranjit Unnikrishnan; Arivudainambi Kayal; Viswanathan Mohan
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.280

10.  Risk Factors for Hyperglycaemia in Pregnancy in Tamil Nadu, India.

Authors:  Karoline Kragelund Nielsen; Peter Damm; Anil Kapur; Vijayam Balaji; Madhuri S Balaji; Veerasamy Seshiah; Ib C Bygbjerg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.