Literature DB >> 17499158

Neural representations of pantomimed and actual tool use: evidence from an event-related fMRI study.

J Hermsdörfer1, G Terlinden, M Mühlau, G Goldenberg, A M Wohlschläger.   

Abstract

Pantomime of tool use is a highly sensitive test to detect apraxia. The relationship to real-life performance is however unclear since apraxic patients frequently improve substantially when allowed to actually use tools. In the present study, the neural correlates of pantomimed and actual tool use were directly compared in healthy subjects using an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigm. Subjects were requested to demonstrate the use of various tools either as pantomimes or with the tool in hand. Movement and pre-movement events were evaluated. The comparison of all conditions versus rest revealed a widespread activation including parietal, posterior temporal, frontal, and subcortical areas with some characteristic activation for the different events. The direct comparison between pantomime and actual use conditions revealed no or only minor differential activations for pre-movement events. During the movement event, actual tool use induced the expected additional activation in sensory and motor areas, but also representations presumably related to tool-use knowledge at parietal, posterior temporal, and frontal sites. The opposite contrast of pantomimed versus actual tool use revealed differential activation only in the left intraparietal sulcus in a corresponding region-of-interest analysis. We conclude that planning and preparing of either pantomimed or actual tool use share large parts of a common network. Characteristic differences in the kinematics and dynamics of both movement conditions may be defined just before or during the initiation of the movement when sensory cues about the tool and environment are available in the actual use condition. Sensory and cognitive cues may provide apraxic patients the capacity to evoke a correct action program despite impaired pantomime.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17499158     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  47 in total

1.  Apraxia impairs intentional retrieval of incidentally acquired motor knowledge.

Authors:  Anna Dovern; Gereon R Fink; Jochen Saliger; Hans Karbe; Iring Koch; Peter H Weiss
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Grab an object with a tool and change your body: tool-use-dependent changes of body representation for action.

Authors:  Lucilla Cardinali; Stéphane Jacobs; Claudio Brozzoli; Francesca Frassinetti; Alice C Roy; Alessandro Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Hemispheric asymmetries of motor versus nonmotor processes during (visuo)motor control.

Authors:  Dorothée V Callaert; Katrien Vercauteren; Ronald Peeters; Fred Tam; Simon Graham; Stephan P Swinnen; Stefan Sunaert; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  [Structural and functional neuroimaging of the pathophysiology of apraxia].

Authors:  P H Weiss; G R Fink
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  Neural correlates of pantomiming familiar and unfamiliar tools: action semantics versus mechanical problem solving?

Authors:  Guy Vingerhoets; Elisabeth Vandekerckhove; Pieterjan Honoré; Pieter Vandemaele; Eric Achten
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  A common network in the left cerebral hemisphere represents planning of tool use pantomimes and familiar intransitive gestures at the hand-independent level.

Authors:  Gregory Króliczak; Scott H Frey
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Dissociating affordance and spatial compatibility effects using a pantomimed reaching action.

Authors:  Samuel Couth; Emma Gowen; Ellen Poliakoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Gesture subtype-dependent left lateralization of praxis planning: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  S Bohlhalter; N Hattori; L Wheaton; E Fridman; E A Shamim; G Garraux; M Hallett
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Cerebral lateralization of praxis in right- and left-handedness: same pattern, different strength.

Authors:  Guy Vingerhoets; Frederic Acke; Ann-Sofie Alderweireldt; Jo Nys; Pieter Vandemaele; Eric Achten
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Probing for hemispheric specialization for motor skill learning: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.

Authors:  Heidi M Schambra; Mitsunari Abe; David A Luckenbaugh; Janine Reis; John W Krakauer; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.