Literature DB >> 19084221

Unusual use of objects after unilateral brain damage: the technical reasoning model.

François Osiurak1, Christophe Jarry, Philippe Allain, Ghislaine Aubin, Frédérique Etcharry-Bouyx, Isabelle Richard, Isabelle Bernard, Didier Le Gall.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that gesture engrams, conceptual knowledge and/or the ability to infer function from structure can support object use. The present paper proposes an alternative view which is based upon the idea that object use requires solely the ability to reason about technical means provided by objects. Technical means are abstract principles which are not linked with any object representation (e.g., cutting involves the opposition between dense and permeable material). The technical reasoning model predicts that the inability to perform technical reasoning should impair performance in any situation requiring the use of objects (in a conventional way or not). Twenty left brain-damaged (LBD) patients, 11 right brain-damaged (RBD) patients and 41 healthy controls were examined on experimental tests assessing the conventional use of objects (e.g., screwing a screw with a screwdriver), conceptual knowledge about object function, pantomime of object use and recognition of object utilization gestures. We also designed the Unusual Use of Objects Test, which demands unusual applications of objects to achieve a purpose for which the usually applied object is not provided (e.g., screwing a screw with a knife). The key findings are that only LBD patients have more difficulties on the Unusual Use of Objects Test than controls or RBD patients, and that the severity of their impairment is correlated with that on conventional use of objects. Correlations with tests assessing conceptual knowledge as well as with tests of pantomime of object use and recognition of object utilization gestures were weaker. These results support the technical reasoning model and question the role of conceptual knowledge and gesture engrams in object use. Since the technical reasoning model also predicts two distinct technical disorders, the discussion focuses on the existence of these disorders in regard to individual performance profiles obtained in the Unusual Use of Objects Test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19084221     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2008.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  30 in total

1.  Neural correlates of pantomiming familiar and unfamiliar tools: action semantics versus mechanical problem solving?

Authors:  Guy Vingerhoets; Elisabeth Vandekerckhove; Pieterjan Honoré; Pieter Vandemaele; Eric Achten
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Apraxia and Alzheimer's disease: review and perspectives.

Authors:  Mathieu Lesourd; Didier Le Gall; Josselin Baumard; Bernard Croisile; Christophe Jarry; François Osiurak
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  How similar are nut-cracking and stone-flaking? A functional approach to percussive technology.

Authors:  Blandine Bril; Ross Parry; Gilles Dietrich
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  A goal-based mechanism for delayed motor intention: considerations from motor skills, tool use and action memory.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; François Osiurak
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-06-10

5.  Anticipatory eye fixations reveal tool knowledge for tool interaction.

Authors:  Anna Belardinelli; Marissa Barabas; Marc Himmelbach; Martin V Butz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A distributed network critical for selecting among tool-directed actions.

Authors:  Christine E Watson; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Tool use without a tool: kinematic characteristics of pantomiming as compared to actual use and the effect of brain damage.

Authors:  Joachim Hermsdörfer; Yong Li; Jennifer Randerath; Georg Goldenberg; Leif Johannsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Tool use and perceived distance: when unreachable becomes spontaneously reachable.

Authors:  François Osiurak; Nicolas Morgado; Richard Palluel-Germain
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  A neuropsychological perspective on the link between language and praxis in modern humans.

Authors:  Agnes Roby-Brami; Joachim Hermsdörfer; Alice C Roy; Stéphane Jacobs
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  A Cognitive Overview of Limb Apraxia.

Authors:  Angela Bartolo; Heidi Stieglitz Ham
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 5.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.