Literature DB >> 17293615

Movement planning in prehension: do intended actions influence the initial reach and grasp movement?

Claudia Armbrüster1, Will Spijkers.   

Abstract

In three experiments the influence of different consecutive movements on an initial reaching and prehension movement was examined. These so-called after-grasp movements, defined as movements following a prehension movement towards an object, were lifting and raising the object, throwing the object in a bin, and positioning it accurately on a target location. Three different groups of participants (N1 = 8, N2 = 10, N3 = 10) accomplished the lifting and one of the three other after-grasp movements each with three different object sizes and with the left and the right hand. In total, each participant executed 240 trials. Fourteen movement parameter values were examined to analyze the effects of the after-grasp movements on the initial reach and grasp movement. The results showed that movement parameter values of the initial reach and grasp movement were affected differently depending on the type of consecutive movement. In particular, the deceleration phase prior to object contact differed between movement types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17293615     DOI: 10.1123/mcj.10.4.311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Motor Control        ISSN: 1087-1640            Impact factor:   1.422


  34 in total

1.  An object for an action, the same object for other actions: effects on hand shaping.

Authors:  Caterina Ansuini; Livia Giosa; Luca Turella; Gianmarco Altoè; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Tailoring reach-to-grasp to intended action: the role of motor practice.

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Kinematic Analysis Using 3D Motion Capture of Drinking Task in People With and Without Upper-extremity Impairments.

Authors:  Margit Alt Murphy; Steve Murphy; Hanna C Persson; Ulla-Britt Bergström; Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  To use or to move: goal-set modulates priming when grasping real tools.

Authors:  Kenneth F Valyear; Craig S Chapman; Jason P Gallivan; Robert S Mark; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The inimitable mouth: task-dependent kinematic differences are independent of terminal precision.

Authors:  Jason W Flindall; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  To eat or not to eat? Kinematics and muscle activity of reach-to-grasp movements are influenced by the action goal, but observers do not detect these differences.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Arran T Reader; Carmel Houston-Price; Andrew J Bremner; Nicholas P Holmes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Breaking the flow of an action.

Authors:  Caterina Ansuini; Katya Grigis; Stefano Massaccesi; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  To throw or to place: does onward intention affect how a child reaches for an object?

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Maia Byrne; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effects of altered transport paths and intermediate movement goals on human grasp kinematics.

Authors:  Constanze Hesse; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.

Authors:  Christian Seegelke; Charmayne M L Hughes; Christoph Schütz; Thomas Schack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.