Literature DB >> 11163376

Recognition and imitation of pantomimed motor acts after unilateral parietal and premotor lesions: a perspective on apraxia.

U Halsband1, J Schmitt, M Weyers, F Binkofski, G Grützner, H J Freund.   

Abstract

We compared gesture comprehension and imitation in patients with lesions in the left parietal lobe (LPAR, n=5) and premotor cortex/supplementary motor area (LPMA, n=8) in patients with damage to the right parietal lobe (RPAR, n=6) and right premotor/supplementary motor area (RPMA, n=6) and in 16 non-brain damaged control subjects. Three patients with left parietal lobe damage had aphasia. Subjects were shown 136 meaningful pantomimed motor acts on a videoscreen and were asked to identify the movements and to imitate the motor acts from memory with their ipsilesional and contralesional hand or with both hands simultaneously. Motor tasks included gestures without object use (e.g. to salute, to wave) pantomimed imitation of gestures on one's own body (e.g. to comb one's hair) and pantomimed imitation of motor acts which imply tool use to an object in extrapersonal space (e.g. to hammer a nail). Videotaped test performance was analysed by two independent raters; errors were classified as spatial errors, body part as object, parapraxic performance and non-identifiable movements. In addition, action discrimination was tested by evaluating whether a complex motor sequence was correctly performed. Results indicate that LPAR patients were most severely disturbed when imitation performance was assessed. Interestingly, LPAR patients were worse when imitating gestures on their own bodies than imitating movements with reference to an external object use with most pronounced deficits in the spatial domain. In contrast to imitation, comprehension was not or only slightly disturbed and no clear correlation was found between the severity of imitation deficits and gesture comprehension. Moreover, although the three patients with aphasia imitated the movements more poorly than non-aphasic LPAR patients, the severity of comprehension errors did not differ. Whereas unimanual imitating performance and gesture comprehension of PMA patients did not differ significantly from control subjects, bimanual tasks were severely disturbed, in particular when executing different movements simultaneously with the right and left hands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11163376     DOI: 10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00088-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  42 in total

1.  Enactment effect in memory: evidence concerning the function of the supramarginal gyrus.

Authors:  Michael O Russ; Wolfgang Mack; Carina-Raluca Grama; Heinrich Lanfermann; Monika Knopf
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Electrophysiology and brain imaging of biological motion.

Authors:  Aina Puce; David Perrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  The cerebral representation of temporomandibular joint occlusion and its alternation by occlusal splints.

Authors:  Martin Lotze; Christian Lucas; Martin Domin; Bernd Kordass
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  [Apraxias].

Authors:  F Binkofski; G Fink
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.214

5.  A new way to quantify the fidelity of imitation: preliminary results with gesture sequences.

Authors:  Brian J Gold; Marc Pomplun; Nichola J Rice; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Cortico-cortical networks in patients with ideomotor apraxia as revealed by EEG coherence analysis.

Authors:  Lewis A Wheaton; Stephan Bohlhalter; Guido Nolte; Hiroshi Shibasaki; Noriaki Hattori; Esteban Fridman; Sherry Vorbach; Jordan Grafman; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Neuropsychological perspectives on the mechanisms of imitation.

Authors:  Raffaella I Rumiati; Joana C Carmo; Corrado Corradi-Dell'Acqua
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Towards a computational neuropsychology of action.

Authors:  John W Krakauer; Reza Shadmehr
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

9.  An fMRI study of imitation: action representation and body schema.

Authors:  Thierry Chaminade; Andrew N Meltzoff; Jean Decety
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Deficient supplementary motor area at rest: Neural basis of limb kinetic deficits in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Stefanie Kübel; Katharina Stegmayer; Tim Vanbellingen; Sebastian Walther; Stephan Bohlhalter
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.