Literature DB >> 27044519

Interferences and Limitations in Blood Glucose Self-Testing: An Overview of the Current Knowledge.

Michael Erbach1, Guido Freckmann2, Rolf Hinzmann3, Bernhard Kulzer4, Ralph Ziegler5, Lutz Heinemann6, Oliver Schnell7.   

Abstract

In general, patients with diabetes performing self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) can strongly rely on the accuracy of measurement results. However, various factors such as application errors, extreme environmental conditions, extreme hematocrit values, or medication interferences may potentially falsify blood glucose readings. Incorrect blood glucose readings may lead to treatment errors, for example, incorrect insulin dosing. Therefore, the diabetes team as well as the patients should be well informed about limitations in blood glucose testing. The aim of this publication is to review the current knowledge on limitations and interferences in blood glucose testing with the perspective of their clinical relevance.
© 2016 Diabetes Technology Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SMBG; blood glucose testing; diabetes; interference; reliability; self-monitoring of blood glucose

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27044519      PMCID: PMC5032951          DOI: 10.1177/1932296816641433

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  55 in total

1.  Effects of different hematocrit levels on glucose measurements with handheld meters for point-of-care testing.

Authors:  Z Tang; J H Lee; R F Louie; G J Kost
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Benefits of self-monitoring blood glucose in the management of new-onset Type 2 diabetes mellitus: the St Carlos Study, a prospective randomized clinic-based interventional study with parallel groups.

Authors:  Alejandra Durán; Patricia Martín; Isabelle Runkle; Natalia Pérez; Rosario Abad; Mercedes Fernández; Laura Del Valle; Maria Fuencisla Sanz; Alfonso Luis Calle-Pascual
Journal:  J Diabetes       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.006

3.  Professional Practice Committee for the Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2016.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 19.112

4.  Partial pressure of oxygen in capillary blood samples from the fingertip.

Authors:  Guido Freckmann; Christina Schmid; Annette Baumstark; Stefan Pleus; Manuela Link; Cornelia Haug
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-11-01

Review 5.  Factors affecting blood glucose monitoring: sources of errors in measurement.

Authors:  Barry H Ginsberg
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

6.  Parameters affecting postprandial blood glucose: effects of blood glucose measurement errors.

Authors:  Theodor Koschinsky; Sascha Heckermann; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-01

Review 7.  System accuracy of blood glucose monitoring systems: impact of use by patients and ambient conditions.

Authors:  Christina Schmid; Cornelia Haug; Lutz Heinemann; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 6.118

8.  Multicenter study of oxygen-insensitive handheld glucose point-of-care testing in critical care/hospital/ambulatory patients in the United States and Canada.

Authors:  G J Kost; H T Vu; J H Lee; P Bourgeois; F L Kiechle; C Martin; S S Miller; A O Okorodudu; J J Podczasy; R Webster; K J Whitlow
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Accuracy of handheld blood glucose meters at high altitude.

Authors:  Pieter de Mol; Hans G Krabbe; Suzanna T de Vries; Marion J Fokkert; Bert D Dikkeschei; Rienk Rienks; Karin M Bilo; Henk J G Bilo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Clinical implications and economic impact of accuracy differences among commercially available blood glucose monitoring systems.

Authors:  Erwin S Budiman; Navendu Samant; Ansgar Resch
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-03-01
View more
  28 in total

1.  Impact of High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C for Treatment of Sepsis on Point-of-Care Blood Glucose Readings.

Authors:  Anna Peyton Howell; Jenna L Parrett; Daniel R Malcom
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-25

2.  Laboratory Evaluation of Linearity, Repeatability, and Hematocrit Interference With an Internet-Enabled Blood Glucose Meter.

Authors:  Filiz Demircik; Valeria Kirsch; Sanja Ramljak; Mario Vogg; Anke H Pfützner; Andreas Pfützner
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-04-11

3.  System Accuracy Assessment of a Blood Glucose Meter With Wireless Internet Access Associated With Unusual Hypoglycemia Patterns in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Andreas Pfützner; Filiz Demircik; Valeria Kirsch; Johannes Pfützner; Stephanie Strobl; Mina Hanna; Jan Spatz; Anke H Pfützner
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-04-11

4.  Analysis of a Unique Postmarket Surveillance Dataset That a Glucose Test-Strip Demonstrates no Evidence of Interference and Robust Clinical Accuracy Irrespective of the Prescription Medication Status of a Large Cohort of Patients With Diabetes.

Authors:  Mike Grady; Hilary Cameron; Stuart Phillips; Gillian Smith; Steven Setford
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-09-03

5.  Development and clinical trial of a smartphone-based colorimetric detection system for self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Authors:  Hung-Chih Wang; Fuh-Yu Chang; Tung-Meng Tsai; Chieh-Hsiao Chen; Yen-Yu Chen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Bolus Insulin Dose Error Distributions Based on Results From Two Clinical Trials Comparing Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems.

Authors:  Scott Pardo; Nancy Dunne; David A Simmons
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-06-12

7.  Nonadjunctive Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors for Insulin Dosing: Is It Safe?

Authors:  Alan R Shapiro
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-03-01

8.  Estimating plasma glucose with the FreeStyle Libre Pro continuous glucose monitor during oral glucose tolerance tests in youth without diabetes.

Authors:  Nejla Ghane; Miranda M Broadney; Elisabeth K Davis; Robert W Trenschel; Shavonne M Collins; Sheila M Brady; Jack A Yanovski
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 4.866

9.  Capillary and Venous Blood Glucose Accuracy in Blood Glucose Meters Versus Reference Standards: The Impact of Study Design on Accuracy Evaluations.

Authors:  Kirsty Macleod; Laurence B Katz; Hilary Cameron
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-08-07

Review 10.  Glycemic Monitoring and Management in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Galindo; Roy W Beck; Maria F Scioscia; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Katherine R Tuttle
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 19.871

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.