Literature DB >> 6480510

Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. I. Compound action potential recordings.

P H Stypulkowski, C van den Honert.   

Abstract

The electrically evoked compound action potential (CAP) of the auditory nerve exhibits two peaks, termed N0, at 350 microseconds latency, and N1, at 550 microseconds latency. At low stimulus intensities the CAP consists solely of the long latency N1 peak. As the stimulus strength is increased the higher threshold N0 appears. At high stimulus intensities N1 disappears and only the N0 component of the CAP remains. It is postulated that N1 represents action potentials propagated from the dendritic processes of the auditory neurons and that N0 represents action potentials initiated on the axons of these cells. The N1 peak exhibits anomalous refractory behavior which can be identified in the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR). That behavior may be useful diagnostically in assessing the extent of dendrite degeneration in cochlear implant candidates and users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6480510     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(84)90051-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  21 in total

1.  Renewal-process approximation of a stochastic threshold model for electrical neural stimulation.

Authors:  I C Bruce; L S Irlicht; M W White; S J O'Leary; G M Clark
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  Discharge properties of identified cochlear nucleus neurons and auditory nerve fibers in response to repetitive electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Alexander L Babalian; David K Ryugo; Eric M Rouiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural masking by sub-threshold electric stimuli: animal and computer model results.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Jihwan Woo; Paul J Abbas; Ning Hu; Barbara K Robinson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-11-16

4.  Auditory nerve fiber responses to combined acoustic and electric stimulation.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Kirill V Nourski; Fawen Zhang; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-02-10

5.  Temporal Response Properties of the Auditory Nerve in Implanted Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder and Implanted Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shuman He; Paul J Abbas; Danielle V Doyle; Tyler C McFayden; Stephen Mulherin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  How electrically evoked compound action potentials in chronically implanted guinea pigs relate to auditory nerve health and electrode impedance.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Deborah J Colesa; Christopher J Buswinka; Andrew M Rabah; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory-nerve responses to varied inter-phase gap and phase duration of the electric pulse stimulus as predictors for neuronal degeneration.

Authors:  Dyan Ramekers; Huib Versnel; Stefan B Strahl; Emma M Smeets; Sjaak F L Klis; Wilko Grolman
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-28

8.  Exploring the Source of Neural Responses of Different Latencies Obtained from Different Recording Electrodes in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Akinori Kashio; Viral D Tejani; Rachel A Scheperle; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  Characterization of the electrically evoked compound action potential of the vestibular nerve.

Authors:  Kaibao Nie; Steven M Bierer; Leo Ling; Trey Oxford; Jay T Rubinstein; James O Phillips
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.