Literature DB >> 27033086

Induced Loudness Reduction and Enhancement in Acoustic and Electric Hearing.

Ningyuan Wang1,2, Heather Kreft3, Andrew J Oxenham4,3.   

Abstract

The loudness of a tone can be reduced by preceding it with a more intense tone. This effect, known as induced loudness reduction (ILR), has been reported to last for several seconds. The underlying neural mechanisms are unknown. One possible contributor to the effect involves changes in cochlear gain via the medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents. Since cochlear implants (CIs) bypass the cochlea, investigating whether and how CI users experience ILR should help provide a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms. In the present study, ILR was examined in both normal-hearing listeners and CI users by examining the effects of an intense precursor (50 or 500 ms) on the loudness of a 50-ms target, as judged by comparing it to a spectrally remote 50-ms comparison sound. The interstimulus interval (ISI) between the precursor and the target was varied between 10 and 1000 ms to estimate the time course of ILR. In general, the patterns of results from the CI users were similar to those found in the normal-hearing listeners. However, in the short-precursor short-ISI condition, an enhancement in the loudness of target was observed in CI subjects that was not present in the normal-hearing listeners, consistent with the effects of an additional attenuation present in the normal-hearing listeners but not in the CI users. The results suggest that the MOC may play a role but that it is not the only source of these loudness context effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory context effects; cochlear implants; loudness; loudness recalibration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27033086      PMCID: PMC4940285          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-016-0563-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  21 in total

1.  Loudness enhancement: monaural, binaural, and dichotic.

Authors:  R Elmasian; R Galambos
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Time course of loudness recalibration: implications for loudness enhancement.

Authors:  Yoav Arieh; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Evidence of the enhancement effect in electrical stimulation via electrode matching (L).

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Mitchell J Mostardi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Loudness enhancement: induced loudness reduction in disguise? (L).

Authors:  Bertram Scharf; Søren Buus; Bärbel Nieder
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The mid-difference hump in forward-masked intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Loudness enhancement and intensity discrimination under forward and backward masking.

Authors:  C J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Loudness Context Effects in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-04

9.  "Recalibrating" the auditory system: the perception of loudness.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  An adaptive procedure for subjective judgments.

Authors:  W Jesteadt
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-07
View more
  5 in total

1.  Auditory Enhancement in Cochlear-Implant Users Under Simultaneous and Forward Masking.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-16

2.  Auditory enhancement and the role of spectral resolution in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acoustic Context Alters Vowel Categorization in Perception of Noise-Vocoded Speech.

Authors:  Christian E Stilp
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-09

4.  Auditory enhancement under simultaneous masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Heather A Kreft; Magdalena Wojtczak; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Neural Representation of Loudness: Cortical Evoked Potentials in an Induced Loudness Reduction Experiment.

Authors:  Florian H Schmidt; Manfred Mauermann; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.