Literature DB >> 18345845

The mid-difference hump in forward-masked intensity discrimination.

Daniel Oberfeld1.   

Abstract

Forward-masked intensity-difference limens (DLs) for pure-tone standards presented at low, medium, and high levels were obtained for a wide range of masker-standard level differences. At a standard level of 25 dB SPL, the masker had a significant effect on intensity resolution, and the data showed a mid-difference hump: The DL elevation was greater at intermediate than at large masker-standard level differences. These results support the hypothesis that the effect of a forward masker on intensity resolution is modulated by the similarity between the masker and the standard. For a given masker-standard level difference, the effect of the masker on the DL was larger for a 55-dB SPL than for the 25-dB SPL standard, providing new support for a midlevel hump. To examine whether the masker-induced DL elevations are related to masker-induced loudness changes [R. P. Carlyon and H. A. Beveridge, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93, 2886-2895 (1993)], the effect of the masker on target loudness was measured for the same listeners. Loudness enhancement followed a mid-difference hump pattern at both the low and the intermediate target level. The correlation between loudness changes and DL elevations was significant, but several aspects of the data are incompatible with the predicted one-on-one relation between the two effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18345845     DOI: 10.1121/1.2837284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Loudness Context Effects in Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-04

3.  Induced Loudness Reduction and Enhancement in Acoustic and Electric Hearing.

Authors:  Ningyuan Wang; Heather Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-31

4.  Neural Representation of Loudness: Cortical Evoked Potentials in an Induced Loudness Reduction Experiment.

Authors:  Florian H Schmidt; Manfred Mauermann; Birger Kollmeier
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

5.  Temporal Loudness Weights Are Frequency Specific.

Authors:  Alexander Fischenich; Jan Hots; Jesko Verhey; Daniel Oberfeld
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-19

6.  Sequential grouping modulates the effect of non-simultaneous masking on auditory intensity resolution.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Patricia Stahn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Factors limiting performance in a multitone intensity-discrimination task: disentangling non-optimal decision weights and increased internal noise.

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Martha Kuta; Walt Jesteadt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Why do forward maskers affect auditory intensity discrimination? Evidence from "molecular psychophysics".

Authors:  Daniel Oberfeld; Patricia Stahn; Martha Kuta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Temporal loudness weights: Primacy effects, loudness dominance and their interaction.

Authors:  Alexander Fischenich; Jan Hots; Jesko Verhey; Julia Guldan; Daniel Oberfeld
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.