Literature DB >> 28281035

Acoustic Context Alters Vowel Categorization in Perception of Noise-Vocoded Speech.

Christian E Stilp1.   

Abstract

Normal-hearing listeners' speech perception is widely influenced by spectral contrast effects (SCEs), where perception of a given sound is biased away from stable spectral properties of preceding sounds. Despite this influence, it is not clear how these contrast effects affect speech perception for cochlear implant (CI) users whose spectral resolution is notoriously poor. This knowledge is important for understanding how CIs might better encode key spectral properties of the listening environment. Here, SCEs were measured in normal-hearing listeners using noise-vocoded speech to simulate poor spectral resolution. Listeners heard a noise-vocoded sentence where low-F1 (100-400 Hz) or high-F1 (550-850 Hz) frequency regions were amplified to encourage "eh" (/ɛ/) or "ih" (/ɪ/) responses to the following target vowel, respectively. This was done by filtering with +20 dB (experiment 1a) or +5 dB gain (experiment 1b) or filtering using 100 % of the difference between spectral envelopes of /ɛ/ and /ɪ/ endpoint vowels (experiment 2a) or only 25 % of this difference (experiment 2b). SCEs influenced identification of noise-vocoded vowels in each experiment at every level of spectral resolution. In every case but one, SCE magnitudes exceeded those reported for full-spectrum speech, particularly when spectral peaks in the preceding sentence were large (+20 dB gain, 100 % of the spectral envelope difference). Even when spectral resolution was insufficient for accurate vowel recognition, SCEs were still evident. Results are suggestive of SCEs influencing CI users' speech perception as well, encouraging further investigation of CI users' sensitivity to acoustic context.

Keywords:  Cochlear implants; Context effects; Normalization; Spectral contrast effects; Speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28281035      PMCID: PMC5418160          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-017-0615-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  47 in total

1.  Psychophysical laws revealed by electric hearing.

Authors:  F G Zeng; R V Shannon
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-06-23       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  P C Loizou; O Poroy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Behavioral examinations of the level of auditory processing of speech context effects.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Andrew J Lotto
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Preceding phonetic context affects perception of nonspeech.

Authors:  Joseph D W Stephens; Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  F G Zeng; J J Galvin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  The effect of reduced dynamic range on speech understanding: implications for patients with cochlear implants.

Authors:  P C Loizou; M Dorman; J Fitzke
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Temporally nonadjacent nonlinguistic sounds affect speech categorization.

Authors:  Lori L Holt
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-04

8.  Sensitivity to isolated and concurrent intensity and fundamental frequency increments by cochlear implant users under natural listening conditions.

Authors:  Cheryl F Rogers; Eric W Healy; Allen A Montgomery
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  The mean matters: effects of statistically defined nonspeech spectral distributions on speech categorization.

Authors:  Lori L Holt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Is vowel normalization independent of lexical processing?

Authors:  Holger Mitterer
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  2006-12-19       Impact factor: 1.759

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of spectral resolution on spectral contrast effects in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Spectral contrast effects produced by competing speech contexts.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Accommodation of gender-related phonetic differences by listeners with cochlear implants and in a variety of vocoder simulations.

Authors:  Matthew B Winn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Spectral Contrast Effects Reveal Different Acoustic Cues for Vowel Recognition in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Lei Feng; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.