OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of a 70-kVp CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) protocol using simultaneous dual-source (SimDS) acquisition mode with 40 ml of contrast medium (CM) and comparison with a high-pitch spiral dual-source (SpiralDS) acquisition protocol with automated tube potential selection (ATPS). METHODS: Following the introduction of a new 70-kVp/40-ml SimDS-CTPA protocol in December 2014 for all patients with a body mass index (BMI) below 35 kg m(-2), the first 35 patients were retrospectively included in this study and assigned to Group A (BMI: 27 ± 4 kg m(-2), age: 66 ± 15 years). The last 35 patients with a BMI below 35 kg m(-2) who had received SpiralDS-CTPA with ATPS were included for comparison (Group B) (70 ml CM; BMI: 27 ± 4 kg m(-2), age: 68 ± 16 years). Subjective image quality (image quality) was assessed by two radiologists (from 1, non-diagnostic, to 4, excellent). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP) and effective dose were assessed. RESULTS: All examinations were of diagnostic image quality. Subjective image quality, SNR and CNR were comparable between Groups A and B (3.7 ± 0.6 vs 3.7 ± 0.5, 14.6 ± 6.0 vs 13.9 ± 3.7 and 12.4 ± 5.7 vs 11.6 ± 3.3, respectively; p > 0.05). CTDIvol, DLP and effective dose were significantly lower in Group A than in Group B (4.5 ± 1.6 vs 7.5 ± 2.1 mGy, 143.3 ± 44.8 vs 278.3 ± 79.44 mGy cm and 2.0 ± 0.6 vs 3.9 ± 1.1 mSv, respectively; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: 70-kVp SimDS-CTPA with 40 ml of CM is feasible and provides diagnostic image quality, while radiation dose and CM can be reduced by almost 50% and 40%, respectively, compared with a SpiralDS-CTPA protocol with ATPS. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: 70-kVp SimDS-CTPA with 40 ml of CM is feasible in patients with a BMI up to 35 kg m(-2) and can help reduce radiation exposure and CM in these patients.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of a 70-kVp CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) protocol using simultaneous dual-source (SimDS) acquisition mode with 40 ml of contrast medium (CM) and comparison with a high-pitch spiral dual-source (SpiralDS) acquisition protocol with automated tube potential selection (ATPS). METHODS: Following the introduction of a new 70-kVp/40-ml SimDS-CTPA protocol in December 2014 for all patients with a body mass index (BMI) below 35 kg m(-2), the first 35 patients were retrospectively included in this study and assigned to Group A (BMI: 27 ± 4 kg m(-2), age: 66 ± 15 years). The last 35 patients with a BMI below 35 kg m(-2) who had received SpiralDS-CTPA with ATPS were included for comparison (Group B) (70 ml CM; BMI: 27 ± 4 kg m(-2), age: 68 ± 16 years). Subjective image quality (image quality) was assessed by two radiologists (from 1, non-diagnostic, to 4, excellent). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP) and effective dose were assessed. RESULTS: All examinations were of diagnostic image quality. Subjective image quality, SNR and CNR were comparable between Groups A and B (3.7 ± 0.6 vs 3.7 ± 0.5, 14.6 ± 6.0 vs 13.9 ± 3.7 and 12.4 ± 5.7 vs 11.6 ± 3.3, respectively; p > 0.05). CTDIvol, DLP and effective dose were significantly lower in Group A than in Group B (4.5 ± 1.6 vs 7.5 ± 2.1 mGy, 143.3 ± 44.8 vs 278.3 ± 79.44 mGy cm and 2.0 ± 0.6 vs 3.9 ± 1.1 mSv, respectively; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: 70-kVp SimDS-CTPA with 40 ml of CM is feasible and provides diagnostic image quality, while radiation dose and CM can be reduced by almost 50% and 40%, respectively, compared with a SpiralDS-CTPA protocol with ATPS. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: 70-kVp SimDS-CTPA with 40 ml of CM is feasible in patients with a BMI up to 35 kg m(-2) and can help reduce radiation exposure and CM in these patients.
Authors: Xie Li; Qian Qian Ni; U Joseph Schoepf; Julian L Wichmann; Lloyd M Felmly; Li Qi; Xiang Kong; Chang Sheng Zhou; Song Luo; Long Jiang Zhang; Guang Ming Lu Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Martin Petersilka; Herbert Bruder; Bernhard Krauss; Karl Stierstorfer; Thomas G Flohr Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2008-10-07 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Mathias Meyer; Holger Haubenreisser; U Joseph Schoepf; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Christianne Leidecker; Thomas Allmendinger; Ralf Lehmann; Sonja Sudarski; Martin Borggrefe; Stefan O Schoenberg; Thomas Henzler Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-05-31 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Boris Bodelle; Dorothée Klement; Josef Matthias Kerl; Thomas Lehnert; Claudia Frellesen; Ralf Bauer; Thomas Josef Vogl; Martin Sedlmair; Boris Schulz Journal: Acta Radiol Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 1.990
Authors: Ioannis Vlahos; Megan C Jacobsen; Myrna C Godoy; Konstantinos Stefanidis; Rick R Layman Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2021-09-24 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Saravanabavaan Suntharalingam; Christian Mikat; Elena Stenzel; Youssef Erfanian; Axel Wetter; Thomas Schlosser; Michael Forsting; Kai Nassenstein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-10-18 Impact factor: 3.240