Sultan Aldosari1, Shirley Jansen2,3,4,5, Zhonghua Sun1. 1. Discipline of Medical Radiation Sciences, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. 2. Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia. 3. Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. 4. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia. 5. Heart and Vascular Research Institute, Harry Perkins Medical Research Institute, Perth, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the preferred imaging modality for diagnosis of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). Radiation dose associated with CTPA has been significantly reduced due to the use of dose-reduction strategies, however, investigation of low-dose CTPA with use of different kVp and pitch values has not been systematically studied. The aim of this study was to utilize a 3D printed pulmonary model with simulation of small thrombus in the pulmonary arteries for development of optimal CTPA protocols. METHODS: Animal blood clots were inserted into the pulmonary arteries to simulate peripheral embolism based on a realistic 3D printed pulmonary artery model. The 3D printed model was scanned with 192-slice 3rd generation dual-source CT with 1 mm slice thickness and 0.5 mm reconstruction interval. All images were reconstructed with advanced modelled iterative reconstruction (IR) at a strength level of 3. CTPA scanning parameters were as follows: 70, 80, 100 and 120 kVp, 0.9, 2.2 and 3.2 pitch values. Quantitative assessment of image quality was determined by measuring signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in both main pulmonary arteries, while qualitative analysis of images was scored by two experienced radiologists (score of 1 indicates poor visualization of thrombus with no confidence, and score of 5 excellent visualization of thrombus with high confidence) to determine the image quality in relation to different scanning protocols for detection of thrombus in the pulmonary arteries. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in SNR measurements among all CTPA protocols (P>0.05), regardless of kVp or pitch values used, although SNR was higher with 120 kVp and 0.9 and 2.2 pitch protocols than that in other protocols. The thrombi were detected in all images, with 70 kVp and 3.2 pitch protocol scored the lowest with a score of 3 by two observers, and images with other protocols were scored 4 or 5. Lowering kVp from 120 to 70 with use of high-pitch 2.2 or 3.2 protocol resulted in up to 80% dose reduction without significantly affecting image quality. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose CT pulmonary angiography protocols comprising 70 kVp and high pitch 2.2 or 3.2 allow for detection of peripheral PE with significant reduction in radiation dose while images are still considered diagnostic.
BACKGROUND: Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the preferred imaging modality for diagnosis of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). Radiation dose associated with CTPA has been significantly reduced due to the use of dose-reduction strategies, however, investigation of low-dose CTPA with use of different kVp and pitch values has not been systematically studied. The aim of this study was to utilize a 3D printed pulmonary model with simulation of small thrombus in the pulmonary arteries for development of optimal CTPA protocols. METHODS: Animal blood clots were inserted into the pulmonary arteries to simulate peripheral embolism based on a realistic 3D printed pulmonary artery model. The 3D printed model was scanned with 192-slice 3rd generation dual-source CT with 1 mm slice thickness and 0.5 mm reconstruction interval. All images were reconstructed with advanced modelled iterative reconstruction (IR) at a strength level of 3. CTPA scanning parameters were as follows: 70, 80, 100 and 120 kVp, 0.9, 2.2 and 3.2 pitch values. Quantitative assessment of image quality was determined by measuring signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in both main pulmonary arteries, while qualitative analysis of images was scored by two experienced radiologists (score of 1 indicates poor visualization of thrombus with no confidence, and score of 5 excellent visualization of thrombus with high confidence) to determine the image quality in relation to different scanning protocols for detection of thrombus in the pulmonary arteries. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in SNR measurements among all CTPA protocols (P>0.05), regardless of kVp or pitch values used, although SNR was higher with 120 kVp and 0.9 and 2.2 pitch protocols than that in other protocols. The thrombi were detected in all images, with 70 kVp and 3.2 pitch protocol scored the lowest with a score of 3 by two observers, and images with other protocols were scored 4 or 5. Lowering kVp from 120 to 70 with use of high-pitch 2.2 or 3.2 protocol resulted in up to 80% dose reduction without significantly affecting image quality. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose CT pulmonary angiography protocols comprising 70 kVp and high pitch 2.2 or 3.2 allow for detection of peripheral PE with significant reduction in radiation dose while images are still considered diagnostic.
Authors: Laura J Olivieri; Axel Krieger; Yue-Hin Loke; Dilip S Nath; Peter C W Kim; Craig A Sable Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2015-02-07 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Seth Kligerman; Kian Lahiji; Elizabeth Weihe; Cheng Tin Lin; Silanath Terpenning; Jean Jeudy; Annie Frazier; Robert Pugatch; Jeffrey R Galvin; Deepika Mittal; Kunal Kothari; Charles S White Journal: J Thorac Imaging Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Julian L Wichmann; Xiaohan Hu; Josef M Kerl; Boris Schulz; Claudia Frellesen; Boris Bodelle; Moritz Kaup; Jan-Erik Scholtz; Thomas Lehnert; Thomas J Vogl; Ralf W Bauer Journal: J Thorac Imaging Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Azien Laqmani; Marc Regier; Simon Veldhoen; Alexandra Backhaus; Felicia Wassenberg; Susanne Sehner; Michael Groth; Hans-Dieter Nagel; Gerhard Adam; Frank O Henes Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Guang Ming Lu; Song Luo; Felix G Meinel; Andrew D McQuiston; Chang Sheng Zhou; Xiang Kong; Yan E Zhao; Ling Zheng; U Joseph Schoepf; Long Jiang Zhang Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Thomas Henzler; J Michael Barraza; John W Nance; Philip Costello; Radko Krissak; Christian Fink; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2010-10-29
Authors: Patrick D McLaughlin; T Liang; M Homiedan; L J Louis; T W O'Connell; Karl Krzymyk; S Nicolaou; J R Mayo Journal: Emerg Radiol Date: 2014-07-04
Authors: Michael A Bolen; Rahul D Renapurkar; Zoran B Popovic; Gustavo A Heresi; Scott D Flamm; Charles T Lau; Sandra S Halliburton Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Cynthia H McCollough; Andrew N Primak; Natalie Braun; James Kofler; Lifeng Yu; Jodie Christner Journal: Radiol Clin North Am Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 2.303