Mario Silva1,2, Gianluca Milanese3, Rocco Cobelli4, Carmelinda Manna4, Edoardo Rasciti3, Sara Poggesi3, Nicola Sverzellati3,4. 1. Section of Radiology, Unit of Surgical Sciences, Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), University of Parma, Pad. Barbieri, via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy. mario.silva@unipr.it. 2. Section of Radiology, Diagnostic Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy. mario.silva@unipr.it. 3. Section of Radiology, Unit of Surgical Sciences, Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), University of Parma, Pad. Barbieri, via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy. 4. Section of Radiology, Diagnostic Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively compare semi-qualitative and quantitative CT pulmonary angiography (CTPAs) image metrics testing diagnostic performance between protocols performed by 20 or 40 ml of contrast medium (CM) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: A total of 102 CTPAs performed by 20 ml (ultra-low volume: ULV) and 74 CTPAs performed by 40 ml (low volume: LV) protocol for the diagnosis of clinically suspected PE performed between October 2012 and September 2013 were retrieved. High-concentration CM (Iomeprol 400 mgI/ml) was injected at 3 ml/s (iodine delivery rate 1.2 mgI/s). Two radiologists (blinded and independent) semi-qualitatively scored vascular enhancement and image noise according to a five-point visual scoring system. Quantitative analysis was performed by regions of interest quantifying densitometric parameters, such as central and peripheral pulmonary arteries vascular contrast enhancement (CE, threshold for diagnostic CE ≥ 250 HU), and metrics for image noise. Continuous variables were compared by the Student's t test between groups if normally distributed while categorical variables were analyzed with the Chi-squared test. Interobserver agreement was calculated by the weighted kappa test; correlation coefficients were calculated using Pearson's correlation tests. RESULTS: The semi-qualitative scores for central and peripheral pulmonary arteries vascular CE were sufficient by ULV, yet inferior than LV (p < 0.001). Semi-qualitative image noise was comparable between ULV and LV, and the interobserver agreement was only fair for quality of peripheral vessels. Agreement on nondiagnostic semi-qualitative parameters was seen in 9/102 (8.8%) ULV CTPAs, in particular associated with massive PE (2/9), pleuro-pulmonary abnormalities (5/9) or without major abnormalities (2/9). Quantitative analysis showed that mean CE was lower in ULV group (p < 0.001), though greater than the diagnostic threshold of 250 HU in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic vascular CE (> 250 HU) was obtained in both 20 ml and 40 ml CTPAs. CTPA by 20 ml of CM rendered diagnostic CE for the assessment of pulmonary arteries in patients with clinical suspicion of acute PE. Decreased image quality was mostly associated with massive PE or concomitant pleuro-parenchymal abnormalities.
OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively compare semi-qualitative and quantitative CT pulmonary angiography (CTPAs) image metrics testing diagnostic performance between protocols performed by 20 or 40 ml of contrast medium (CM) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE). METHODS: A total of 102 CTPAs performed by 20 ml (ultra-low volume: ULV) and 74 CTPAs performed by 40 ml (low volume: LV) protocol for the diagnosis of clinically suspected PE performed between October 2012 and September 2013 were retrieved. High-concentration CM (Iomeprol 400 mgI/ml) was injected at 3 ml/s (iodine delivery rate 1.2 mgI/s). Two radiologists (blinded and independent) semi-qualitatively scored vascular enhancement and image noise according to a five-point visual scoring system. Quantitative analysis was performed by regions of interest quantifying densitometric parameters, such as central and peripheral pulmonary arteries vascular contrast enhancement (CE, threshold for diagnostic CE ≥ 250 HU), and metrics for image noise. Continuous variables were compared by the Student's t test between groups if normally distributed while categorical variables were analyzed with the Chi-squared test. Interobserver agreement was calculated by the weighted kappa test; correlation coefficients were calculated using Pearson's correlation tests. RESULTS: The semi-qualitative scores for central and peripheral pulmonary arteries vascular CE were sufficient by ULV, yet inferior than LV (p < 0.001). Semi-qualitative image noise was comparable between ULV and LV, and the interobserver agreement was only fair for quality of peripheral vessels. Agreement on nondiagnostic semi-qualitative parameters was seen in 9/102 (8.8%) ULV CTPAs, in particular associated with massive PE (2/9), pleuro-pulmonary abnormalities (5/9) or without major abnormalities (2/9). Quantitative analysis showed that mean CE was lower in ULV group (p < 0.001), though greater than the diagnostic threshold of 250 HU in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic vascular CE (> 250 HU) was obtained in both 20 ml and 40 ml CTPAs. CTPA by 20 ml of CM rendered diagnostic CE for the assessment of pulmonary arteries in patients with clinical suspicion of acute PE. Decreased image quality was mostly associated with massive PE or concomitant pleuro-parenchymal abnormalities.
Authors: Babs M F Hendriks; Madeleine Kok; Casper Mihl; Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers; Joachim E Wildberger; Marco Das Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Stavros V Konstantinides; Adam Torbicki; Giancarlo Agnelli; Nicolas Danchin; David Fitzmaurice; Nazzareno Galiè; J Simon R Gibbs; Menno V Huisman; Marc Humbert; Nils Kucher; Irene Lang; Mareike Lankeit; John Lekakis; Christoph Maack; Eckhard Mayer; Nicolas Meneveau; Arnaud Perrier; Piotr Pruszczyk; Lars H Rasmussen; Thomas H Schindler; Pavel Svitil; Anton Vonk Noordegraaf; Jose Luis Zamorano; Maurizio Zompatori Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-08-29 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Zsolt Szucs-Farkas; Andreas Christe; Boglarka Megyeri; Martin Rohacek; Peter Vock; Endre V Nagy; Johannes T Heverhagen; Sebastian T Schindera Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Roberto Iezzi; Marco Santoro; Riccardo Marano; Carmine Di Stasi; Roberta Dattesi; Miles Kirchin; Giovanni Tinelli; Francesco Snider; Lorenzo Bonomo Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Aart J van der Molen; Peter Reimer; Ilona A Dekkers; Georg Bongartz; Marie-France Bellin; Michele Bertolotto; Olivier Clement; Gertraud Heinz-Peer; Fulvio Stacul; Judith A W Webb; Henrik S Thomsen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Barbora Horehledova; Casper Mihl; Gianluca Milanese; Rutger Brans; Nienke G Eijsvoogel; Babs M F Hendriks; Joachim E Wildberger; Marco Das Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2018-05-22 Impact factor: 2.740
Authors: Babs M F Hendriks; Roald S Schnerr; Gianluca Milanese; Cécile R L P N Jeukens; Sandra Niesen; Nienke G Eijsvoogel; Joachim E Wildberger; Marco Das Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.500