Sultan Aldosari1, Shirley Jansen2,3,4,5, Zhonghua Sun1. 1. Discipline of Medical Radiation Sciences, School of Molecular and Life Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. 2. Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. 3. School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia. 4. Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia. 5. Heart and Vascular Research Institute, Harry Perkins Medical Research Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been shown to accurately replicate anatomical structures and pathologies in complex cardiovascular disease. Application of 3D printed models to simulate pulmonary arteries and pulmonary embolism (PE) could assist development of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) protocols with low radiation dose, however, this has not been studied in the literature. The aim of this study was to investigate optimal CTPA protocols for detection of PE based on a 3D printed pulmonary model. METHODS: A patient-specific 3D printed pulmonary artery model was generated with thrombus placed in both main pulmonary arteries to represent PE. The model was scanned with 128-slice dual-source CT with slice thickness of 1 and 0.5 mm reconstruction interval. The tube voltage was selected to range from 70, 80, 100 to 120 kVp, and pitch value from 0.9 to 2.2 and 3.2. Quantitative assessment of image quality in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was measured in the main pulmonary arteries and within the thrombus regions to determine the relationship between image quality and scanning protocols. Both two-dimensional (2D) and 3D virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE) images were generated to demonstrate pulmonary artery and thrombus appearances. RESULTS: PE was successfully simulated in the 3D printed pulmonary artery model. There were no significant differences in SNR measured in the main pulmonary arteries with 100 and 120 kVp CTPA protocols (P>0.05), regardless of pitch value used. SNR was significantly lower in the high-pitch 3.2 protocols when compared to other protocols using 70 and 80 kVp (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in SNR measured within the thrombus among the 100 and 120 kVp protocols (P>0.05). For low dose 70 and 80 kVp protocols, SNR was significantly lower in the high-pitch of 3.2 protocols than that in other protocols with different pitch values (P<0.01). 2D images showed the pulmonary arteries and thrombus clearly, while 3D VIE demonstrated intraluminal appearances of pulmonary wall and thrombus in all protocols, except for the 70 kVp and pitch 3.2 protocol, with visualization of thrombus and pulmonary artery wall affected by artifact associated with high image noise. Radiation dose was reduced by up to 80% when lowering kVp from 120 to 100 and 80 kVp with use of 3.2 high-pitch protocol, without significantly affecting image quality. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose CT pulmonary angiography can be achieved with use of low kVp (80 and 100) and high-pitch protocol with significant reduction in radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic images of PE. Use of high pitch, 3.2 in 70 kVp protocol should be avoided due to high image noise and poorer quality.
BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been shown to accurately replicate anatomical structures and pathologies in complex cardiovascular disease. Application of 3D printed models to simulate pulmonary arteries and pulmonary embolism (PE) could assist development of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) protocols with low radiation dose, however, this has not been studied in the literature. The aim of this study was to investigate optimal CTPA protocols for detection of PE based on a 3D printed pulmonary model. METHODS: A patient-specific 3D printed pulmonary artery model was generated with thrombus placed in both main pulmonary arteries to represent PE. The model was scanned with 128-slice dual-source CT with slice thickness of 1 and 0.5 mm reconstruction interval. The tube voltage was selected to range from 70, 80, 100 to 120 kVp, and pitch value from 0.9 to 2.2 and 3.2. Quantitative assessment of image quality in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was measured in the main pulmonary arteries and within the thrombus regions to determine the relationship between image quality and scanning protocols. Both two-dimensional (2D) and 3D virtual intravascular endoscopy (VIE) images were generated to demonstrate pulmonary artery and thrombus appearances. RESULTS: PE was successfully simulated in the 3D printed pulmonary artery model. There were no significant differences in SNR measured in the main pulmonary arteries with 100 and 120 kVp CTPA protocols (P>0.05), regardless of pitch value used. SNR was significantly lower in the high-pitch 3.2 protocols when compared to other protocols using 70 and 80 kVp (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in SNR measured within the thrombus among the 100 and 120 kVp protocols (P>0.05). For low dose 70 and 80 kVp protocols, SNR was significantly lower in the high-pitch of 3.2 protocols than that in other protocols with different pitch values (P<0.01). 2D images showed the pulmonary arteries and thrombus clearly, while 3D VIE demonstrated intraluminal appearances of pulmonary wall and thrombus in all protocols, except for the 70 kVp and pitch 3.2 protocol, with visualization of thrombus and pulmonary artery wall affected by artifact associated with high image noise. Radiation dose was reduced by up to 80% when lowering kVp from 120 to 100 and 80 kVp with use of 3.2 high-pitch protocol, without significantly affecting image quality. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose CT pulmonary angiography can be achieved with use of low kVp (80 and 100) and high-pitch protocol with significant reduction in radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic images of PE. Use of high pitch, 3.2 in 70 kVp protocol should be avoided due to high image noise and poorer quality.
Authors: Zhonghua Sun; John R Winder; Barry E Kelly; Peter K Ellis; Peter T Kennedy; David G Hirst Journal: Comput Med Imaging Graph Date: 2004 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: Azien Laqmani; Marc Regier; Simon Veldhoen; Alexandra Backhaus; Felicia Wassenberg; Susanne Sehner; Michael Groth; Hans-Dieter Nagel; Gerhard Adam; Frank O Henes Journal: Eur J Radiol Date: 2014-07-08 Impact factor: 3.528
Authors: Guang Ming Lu; Song Luo; Felix G Meinel; Andrew D McQuiston; Chang Sheng Zhou; Xiang Kong; Yan E Zhao; Ling Zheng; U Joseph Schoepf; Long Jiang Zhang Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Thomas Henzler; J Michael Barraza; John W Nance; Philip Costello; Radko Krissak; Christian Fink; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2010-10-29
Authors: C W Ong; V Malipatil; M Lavercombe; K G W Teo; P B Coughlin; D Leach; M C Spanger; F Thien Journal: Intern Med J Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 2.048
Authors: Zhonghua Sun; Sultan Ayed Al Dosari; Curtise Ng; Ali al-Muntashari; Saud Almaliky Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2010-02-22 Impact factor: 3.500
Authors: Michael A Bolen; Rahul D Renapurkar; Zoran B Popovic; Gustavo A Heresi; Scott D Flamm; Charles T Lau; Sandra S Halliburton Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Cynthia H McCollough; Andrew N Primak; Natalie Braun; James Kofler; Lifeng Yu; Jodie Christner Journal: Radiol Clin North Am Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 2.303