BACKGROUND: Before introducing 70-kVp settings in the low-kilovoltage strategies for pediatric examinations, it was mandatory to demonstrate, at similar dose levels, an equivalence of image quality at 70 kVp and 80 kVp. OBJECTIVE: To assess image quality of chest CT examinations acquired at 70 kVp in comparison with standard scanning at 80 kVp. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 129 children with a 70-kVp scanning protocol (group 1). All scanning parameters were kept similar to those usually selected for pediatric standard 80-kVp protocols, except the milliamperage increased by a factor of 1.6 to maintain comparable radiation dose. Image quality of group 1 examinations was compared to that of a paired population scanned at 80 kVp (group 2). The noninferiority hypothesis was fixed at 10% of the mean level of image noise. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean dose length product (DLP) and the volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) between the groups (DLP: 20.5 ± 5.8 mGy.cm [group 1] vs. 19.7 ± 7.6 mGy.cm [group 2]; P = 0.06) (CTDIvol: 0.8 ± 0.1 mGy [group 1] vs. 0.8 ± 0.18 mGy [group 2]; P = 0.94). The mean of differences in image noise between group 1 and group 2 examinations was -1.38 (-2.59; -0.18), verifying the noninferiority hypothesis. Subjective image quality did not significantly differ between group 1 and group 2 examinations (P = 0.18). CONCLUSION: At equivalent radiation dose levels, 70-kVp protocols provide similar image quality to that achievable at 80 kVp.
BACKGROUND: Before introducing 70-kVp settings in the low-kilovoltage strategies for pediatric examinations, it was mandatory to demonstrate, at similar dose levels, an equivalence of image quality at 70 kVp and 80 kVp. OBJECTIVE: To assess image quality of chest CT examinations acquired at 70 kVp in comparison with standard scanning at 80 kVp. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 129 children with a 70-kVp scanning protocol (group 1). All scanning parameters were kept similar to those usually selected for pediatric standard 80-kVp protocols, except the milliamperage increased by a factor of 1.6 to maintain comparable radiation dose. Image quality of group 1 examinations was compared to that of a paired population scanned at 80 kVp (group 2). The noninferiority hypothesis was fixed at 10% of the mean level of image noise. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean dose length product (DLP) and the volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) between the groups (DLP: 20.5 ± 5.8 mGy.cm [group 1] vs. 19.7 ± 7.6 mGy.cm [group 2]; P = 0.06) (CTDIvol: 0.8 ± 0.1 mGy [group 1] vs. 0.8 ± 0.18 mGy [group 2]; P = 0.94). The mean of differences in image noise between group 1 and group 2 examinations was -1.38 (-2.59; -0.18), verifying the noninferiority hypothesis. Subjective image quality did not significantly differ between group 1 and group 2 examinations (P = 0.18). CONCLUSION: At equivalent radiation dose levels, 70-kVp protocols provide similar image quality to that achievable at 80 kVp.
Authors: Christopher Herzog; Denise M Mulvihill; Shaun A Nguyen; Giancarlo Savino; Bernhard Schmidt; Philip Costello; Thomas J Vogl; U Joseph Schoepf Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra; Matthew D Gilman; Jiang Hsieh; Homer H Pien; Subba R Digumarthy; Jo-Anne O Shepard Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-03-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Sarabjeet Singh; Mannudeep K Kalra; Michael A Moore; Randheer Shailam; Bob Liu; Thomas L Toth; Ellen Grant; Sjirk J Westra Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-05-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Johannes Boos; Patric Kröpil; Rotem S Lanzman; Joel Aissa; Christoph Schleich; Philipp Heusch; Lino M Sawicki; Gerald Antoch; Christoph Thomas Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-03-23 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Thomas Henzler; Nils Vogler; Bettina Lange; Franz Dally; Mathias Meyer; Stefan O Schoenberg; Maliha Sadick Journal: Eur J Radiol Open Date: 2016-08-12
Authors: Jing Chi; Dongfeng Xu; Shengnan Yin; Man Li; Li Shen; Ning Ding; Xiaofang Chen; Yiding Ji Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-08-21 Impact factor: 1.817