Literature DB >> 26949738

The effects of navigation and types of neighborhoods on timely follow-up of abnormal mammogram among black women.

Sage Kim, Yamile Molina, Anne Elizabeth Glassgow, Nerida Berrios, Jenny Guadamuz, Elizabeth Calhoun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of relatively simple and inexpensive screening tools, minority women are more often diagnosed at a late stage of breast cancer, in part due to delays in follow-up of abnormal screening result. One of the key factors for timely follow-up of abnormal mammogram may be neighborhood characteristics. Patient Navigation (PN) programs aim to diminish barriers, but its differential effects by neighborhood have not been fully examined. The current study examines the effect of types of neighborhoods on time to follow-up of abnormal mammogram, and the differential effects of PN by neighborhood characteristics.
METHODS: We examined data from a total of 1,696 randomized patients from a randomized controlled trial, "the Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas" study that explored the effect of navigation on breast health outcomes. We categorized participants' neighborhoods into three categories and compared the effect of navigation between these neighborhood types.
RESULTS: Navigated women in mixed race neighborhoods had a shorter time to follow-up compared with non-navigated women in the neighborhoods. Black women living in mixed neighborhoods had a significant longer time to follow-up of abnormal mammogram, compared with black women living in middle class black neighborhoods.
CONCLUSION: Patient navigation interventions improve timely follow-up of abnormal mammogram. Patient navigation may be particularly beneficial for minority women who reside in racially heterogeneous neighborhoods which may be less likely to have access to affordable health clinics and social services. Health policies concerning breast cancer early detection for minority women need to pay further attention to those who might potentially be excluded from health services due to the characteristics of neighborhoods. Socioeconomic conditions of neighborhood may affect individual health through multiple interlinked mechanisms. Neighborhood characteristics, such as poverty, segregation, access to resources, and social cohesion, cannot be fully understood with simplistic measures of neighborhood disadvantage.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26949738      PMCID: PMC4775089          DOI: 10.18103/mra.v0i3.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Res Arch        ISSN: 2375-1916


  75 in total

Review 1.  Disparities in screening mammography. Current status, interventions and implications.

Authors:  Monica E Peek; Jini H Han
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Inadequate follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms: findings from the race differences in screening mammography process study (United States).

Authors:  Beth A Jones; Amy Dailey; Lisa Calvocoressi; Kam Reams; Stanislav V Kasl; Carol Lee; Helen Hsu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Racial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogram.

Authors:  Rebecca Press; Olveen Carrasquillo; Robert R Sciacca; Elsa-Grace V Giardina
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Disparities in adherence to recommended followup on screening mammography: interaction of sociodemographic factors.

Authors:  Jadwiga Jodi Strzelczyk; Mark B Dignan
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.847

5.  Neighborhoods and health.

Authors:  Ana V Diez Roux; Christina Mair
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Association of contextual factors and breast cancer screening: finding new targets to promote early detection.

Authors:  David Litaker; Anne Tomolo
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Geographic clustering of adequate diagnostic follow-up after abnormal screening results for breast cancer among low-income women in Missouri.

Authors:  Mario Schootman; Donna B Jeff; William E Gillanders; Yan Yan; Bruce Jenkins; Rebecca Aft
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  An exploration of the patient navigator role: perspectives of younger women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Allison E Pedersen; Thomas F Hack; Susan E McClement; Jill Taylor-Brown
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 9.  Fear, anxiety, worry, and breast cancer screening behavior: a critical review.

Authors:  Nathan S Consedine; Carol Magai; Yulia S Krivoshekova; Lynn Ryzewicz; Alfred I Neugut
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Neighborhood factors associated with time to resolution following an abnormal breast or cervical cancer screening test.

Authors:  Jesse J Plascak; Adana A Llanos; Michael L Pennell; Rory C Weier; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Disadvantaged neighborhoods and racial disparity in breast cancer outcomes: the biological link.

Authors:  Geetanjali Saini; Angela Ogden; Lauren E McCullough; Mylin Torres; Padmashree Rida; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Healthcare Predictors of Information Dissemination About Genetic Risks.

Authors:  Vida Henderson; Shaila M Strayhorn; Nyahne Q Bergeron; Desmona C Strahan; Pamela S Ganschow; Aditya S Khanna; Karriem Watson; Kent Hoskins; Yamile Molina
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  A Comparison of Different Intensities of Patient Navigation After Abnormal Mammography.

Authors:  Anne Elizabeth Glassgow; Yamile Molina; Sage Kim; Richard T Campbell; Julie Darnell; Elizabeth A Calhoun
Journal:  Health Promot Pract       Date:  2018-06-15

4.  Gendered and racialized social expectations, barriers, and delayed breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Sage J Kim; Anne Elizabeth Glassgow; Karriem S Watson; Yamile Molina; Elizabeth A Calhoun
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Leveraging system sciences methods in clinical trial evaluation: An example concerning African American women diagnosed with breast cancer via the Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas study.

Authors:  Yamilé Molina; Aditya Khanna; Karriem S Watson; Dana Villines; Nyahne Bergeron; Shaila Strayhorn; Desmona Strahan; Abigail Skwara; Michael Cronin; Prashanthinie Mohan; Surrey Walton; Tianxiu Wang; John A Schneider; Elizabeth A Calhoun
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2019-07-19

6.  Breast Cancer Disparities Among Women in Underserved Communities in the USA.

Authors:  Beti Thompson; Sarah D Hohl; Yamile Molina; Electra D Paskett; James L Fisher; Ryan D Baltic; Chasity M Washington
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2018-08-29

7.  Assessing patient navigation as a tool to address equity in cancer early detection.

Authors:  Janet Brown; Randi E Kaufman; Molly Ariail; Donna L Williams
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.