Literature DB >> 17574437

Geographic clustering of adequate diagnostic follow-up after abnormal screening results for breast cancer among low-income women in Missouri.

Mario Schootman1, Donna B Jeff, William E Gillanders, Yan Yan, Bruce Jenkins, Rebecca Aft.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In an effort to examine a cluster of late-stage breast cancer, this study reports (1) the extent of geographic variation in adequacy of diagnostic follow-up (ADFU) after abnormal breast cancer screening results across Missouri's counties and census tracts, (2) whether various personal characteristics or area poverty account for any geographic clustering observed, and (3) the association between area poverty rate and ADFU.
METHODS: We used 1998-2002 Missouri Show Me Healthy Women breast and cervical cancer program data from 2580 low-income women aged 50-64 who had abnormal breast cancer screening results. ADFU was based on established guidelines. Poverty rate was from the 2000 census data. We used 3 complementary statistical approaches.
RESULTS: Overall, 26.9% of screening results were inadequately followed up. County-level geographic variation accounted for 6.7% of the total variance in ADFU, while the census-tract-level variation was negligible. Women's sociodemographic characteristics, symptoms reported at time of screening, and screening results accounted for 25% of the county-level variation in ADFU. Statistically significant geographic variation in ADFU remained that could not be explained. Beyond 70 miles from the women's residence, the likelihood of receiving ADFU was geographically uncorrelated. We identified one large geographic cluster extending beyond the borders of counties and census tracts where women were less likely to receive ADFU (relative risk = 0.64; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to improve the likelihood of ADFU should be directed at examining the relative contributions of the healthcare and social environments and characteristics of the women in the area where women were less likely to receive ADFU especially in the cluster area of late-stage breast cancer rather than targeting efforts at the county or census-tract level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17574437     DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Epidemiol        ISSN: 1047-2797            Impact factor:   3.797


  20 in total

1.  Significance of increasing poverty levels for determining late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in 1990 and 2000.

Authors:  Janis Barry; Nancy Breen; Michael Barrett
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Referrals among cancer services organizations serving underserved cancer patients in an urban area.

Authors:  Jenine K Harris; Julianne Cyr; Bobbi J Carothers; Nancy B Mueller; Victoria V Anwuri; Aimee I James
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  A review of spatial methods in epidemiology, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Amy H Auchincloss; Samson Y Gebreab; Christina Mair; Ana V Diez Roux
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  Increasing research literacy: the community research fellows training program.

Authors:  Jacquelyn V Coats; Jewel D Stafford; Vetta Sanders Thompson; Bethany Johnson Javois; Melody S Goodman
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Perceived barriers to mammography among underserved women in a Breast Health Center Outreach Program.

Authors:  Oluwadamilola M Fayanju; Susan Kraenzle; Bettina F Drake; Masayoshi Oka; Melody S Goodman
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  A Place-Oriented, Mixed-Level Regionalization Method for Constructing Geographic Areas in Health Data Dissemination and Analysis.

Authors:  Lan Mu; Fahui Wang; Vivien W Chen; Xiao-Cheng Wu
Journal:  Ann Assoc Am Geogr       Date:  2014

7.  Area-level poverty is associated with greater risk of ambulatory-care-sensitive hospitalizations in older breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Mario Schootman; Donna B Jeffe; Min Lian; Anjali D Deshpande; William E Gillanders; Rebecca Aft; Walton Sumner
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.562

8.  Racial and geographic differences in mammography screening in St. Louis City: a multilevel study.

Authors:  Min Lian; Donna B Jeffe; Mario Schootman
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 3.671

9.  Racial disparities in breast cancer survival: an analysis by age and stage.

Authors:  Anjali D Deshpande; Donna B Jeffe; Jennifer Gnerlich; Ayesha Z Iqbal; Abhishek Thummalakunta; Julie A Margenthaler
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 2.192

10.  Association between hormone receptors and HER-2/neu is age-related.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Xiaoling Wang; Yinying Zou
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.