Literature DB >> 29907079

A Comparison of Different Intensities of Patient Navigation After Abnormal Mammography.

Anne Elizabeth Glassgow1, Yamile Molina1, Sage Kim1, Richard T Campbell1, Julie Darnell2, Elizabeth A Calhoun3.   

Abstract

Background. Patient navigation is a practice strategy to address barriers to timely diagnosis and treatment of cancer. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of varying intensities of patient navigation and timely diagnostic resolution after abnormal mammography. Method. This is a secondary analysis of a subset of women with an abnormal screening or diagnostic mammogram who participated in the "patient navigation in medically underserved areas" 5-year randomized trial. We compared timely diagnostic resolution in women assigned to different intensities of patient navigation including, full navigation intervention, no contact with navigators, or limited contact with navigators. Results. The sample included 1,725 women with abnormal mammogram results. Women who interacted with patient navigators had significantly fewer days to diagnostic resolution after abnormal mammography compared with women who did not interact with patient navigators. Discussion. Results from our study suggest that even limited contact with navigators encourages women to seek more timely diagnostic resolution after an abnormal mammogram, which may offer a low-cost practice strategy to improve timely diagnosis for disadvantaged and underserved women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  breast cancer; health disparities; patient education

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29907079      PMCID: PMC6274628          DOI: 10.1177/1524839918782168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot Pract        ISSN: 1524-8399


  23 in total

1.  Poverty, culture, and social injustice: determinants of cancer disparities.

Authors:  Harold P Freeman
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Are breast cancer navigation programs cost-effective? Evidence from the Chicago Cancer Navigation Project.

Authors:  Talar W Markossian; Elizabeth A Calhoun
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Determinants of cancer disparities: barriers to cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Harold P Freeman; Kenneth C Chu
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.495

4.  Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer?

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Diana L Miglioretti; Nicole Lurie; Linn Abraham; Rachel Ballard Barbash; Jodi Strzelczyk; Mark Dignan; William E Barlow; Cherry M Beasley; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  Is the promise of cancer-screening programs being compromised? Quality of follow-up care after abnormal screening results.

Authors:  K Robin Yabroff; Kathleen Shakira Washington; Amy Leader; Elizabeth Neilson; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.929

6.  National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program: methods, protocol, and measures.

Authors:  Karen M Freund; Tracy A Battaglia; Elizabeth Calhoun; Donald J Dudley; Kevin Fiscella; Electra Paskett; Peter C Raich; Richard G Roetzheim
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Impact of patient navigation on timely cancer care: the Patient Navigation Research Program.

Authors:  Karen M Freund; Tracy A Battaglia; Elizabeth Calhoun; Julie S Darnell; Donald J Dudley; Kevin Fiscella; Martha L Hare; Nancy LaVerda; Ji-Hyun Lee; Paul Levine; David M Murray; Steven R Patierno; Peter C Raich; Richard G Roetzheim; Melissa Simon; Frederick R Snyder; Victoria Warren-Mears; Elizabeth M Whitley; Paul Winters; Gregory S Young; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Boston Patient Navigation Research Program: the impact of navigation on time to diagnostic resolution after abnormal cancer screening.

Authors:  Tracy A Battaglia; Sharon M Bak; Timothy Heeren; Clara A Chen; Richard Kalish; Stephen Tringale; James O Taylor; Barbara Lottero; A Patrick Egan; Nisha Thakrar; Karen M Freund
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  The effects of navigation and types of neighborhoods on timely follow-up of abnormal mammogram among black women.

Authors:  Sage Kim; Yamile Molina; Anne Elizabeth Glassgow; Nerida Berrios; Jenny Guadamuz; Elizabeth Calhoun
Journal:  Med Res Arch       Date:  2015-07

Review 10.  Implementation and maintenance of patient navigation programs linking primary care with community-based health and social services: a scoping literature review.

Authors:  Ruta K Valaitis; Nancy Carter; Annie Lam; Jennifer Nicholl; Janice Feather; Laura Cleghorn
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  1 in total

1.  Organization Communication Factors and Abnormal Mammogram Follow-up: a Qualitative Study Among Ethnically Diverse Women Across Three Healthcare Systems.

Authors:  Jazmine D Kenny; Leah S Karliner; Karla Kerlikowske; Celia P Kaplan; Ana Fernandez-Lamothe; Nancy J Burke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 5.128

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.