BACKGROUND: Although non-Hispanic white women have an increased risk of developing breast cancer, the disease-specific survival is lower for African American and Hispanic women. Little is known about disparities in follow-up after an abnormal mammogram. The goal of this study was to investigate potential disparities in follow-up after an abnormal mammogram. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 6722 women with an abnormal mammogram and documented follow-up from January 2000 through December 2002 was performed at an academic medical center in New York City. The outcome was the number of days between the abnormal mammogram and follow-up imaging or biopsy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the effect of race/ethnicity and other potential covariates. RESULTS: The median number of days to diagnostic follow-up after an abnormal mammogram was greater for African American (20 days) and Hispanic (21 days) women compared with non-Hispanic white (14 days) women (p < 0.001). Racial/ethnic disparities remained significant in a multivariable model controlling for age, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) category, insurance status, provider practice location, and median household income. CONCLUSIONS: After an abnormal mammogram, African American and Hispanic women had longer times to diagnostic follow-up compared with non-Hispanic white women. Future efforts will focus on identifying the barriers to follow-up so that effective interventions may be implemented.
BACKGROUND: Although non-Hispanic white women have an increased risk of developing breast cancer, the disease-specific survival is lower for African American and Hispanic women. Little is known about disparities in follow-up after an abnormal mammogram. The goal of this study was to investigate potential disparities in follow-up after an abnormal mammogram. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 6722 women with an abnormal mammogram and documented follow-up from January 2000 through December 2002 was performed at an academic medical center in New York City. The outcome was the number of days between the abnormal mammogram and follow-up imaging or biopsy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the effect of race/ethnicity and other potential covariates. RESULTS: The median number of days to diagnostic follow-up after an abnormal mammogram was greater for African American (20 days) and Hispanic (21 days) women compared with non-Hispanic white (14 days) women (p < 0.001). Racial/ethnic disparities remained significant in a multivariable model controlling for age, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) category, insurance status, provider practice location, and median household income. CONCLUSIONS: After an abnormal mammogram, African American and Hispanic women had longer times to diagnostic follow-up compared with non-Hispanic white women. Future efforts will focus on identifying the barriers to follow-up so that effective interventions may be implemented.
Authors: Beth A Jones; Amy Dailey; Lisa Calvocoressi; Kam Reams; Stanislav V Kasl; Carol Lee; Helen Hsu Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: V Velanovich; M U Yood; U Bawle; S D Nathanson; V F Strand; G B Talpos; W Szymanski; F R Lewis Journal: Surgery Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Ana M Grau; Ashar Ata; Lakeitha Foster; Nasar U Ahmed; Darcie Reasoner Gorman; Yu Shyr; Steven C Stain; A Scott Pearson Journal: Am Surg Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 0.688
Authors: Heather J Hoffman; Nancy L LaVerda; Paul H Levine; Heather A Young; Lisa M Alexander; Steven R Patierno Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-02-24 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Lorraine Dean; S V Subramanian; David R Williams; Katrina Armstrong; Camille Zubrinsky Charles; Ichiro Kawachi Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Ambili Ramachandran; Frederick R Snyder; Mira L Katz; Julie S Darnell; Donald J Dudley; Steven R Patierno; Mechelle R Sanders; Patricia A Valverde; Melissa A Simon; Victoria Warren-Mears; Tracy A Battaglia Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Richard G Roetzheim; Ji-Hyun Lee; Ercilia R Calcano; Cathy D Meade; William J Fulp; Kristen J Wells Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2012-08
Authors: Tracy A Battaglia; M Christina Santana; Sharon Bak; Manjusha Gokhale; Timothy L Lash; Arlene S Ash; Richard Kalish; Stephen Tringale; James O Taylor; Karen M Freund Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Marc A Emerson; Yvonne M Golightly; Allison E Aiello; Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; Xianming Tan; Ugwuji Maduekwe; Marian Johnson-Thompson; Andrew F Olshan; Melissa A Troester Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-09-21 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Aqsa A Khan; Claudia Sevilla; Cecilia K Wieslander; Meghan B Moran; Rezoana Rashid; Brita Mittal; Sally L Maliski; Rebecca G Rogers; Jennifer T Anger Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.091