Literature DB >> 16132791

Inadequate follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms: findings from the race differences in screening mammography process study (United States).

Beth A Jones1, Amy Dailey, Lisa Calvocoressi, Kam Reams, Stanislav V Kasl, Carol Lee, Helen Hsu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite relatively high mammography screening rates, there are reports of inadequate follow-up of abnormal results. Our objective was to identify factors associated with inadequate follow-up, and specifically, to determine if this outcome differed by race/ethnicity.
METHODS: We studied 176 subjects with abnormal or inconclusive mammograms identified from a prospective cohort study of African-American (n = 635) and White (n = 816) women who underwent screening in five hospital-based facilities in Connecticut, October 1996 through January 1998. Using multivariate logistic regression, we identified independent predictors of inadequate follow-up of an abnormal mammogram.
RESULTS: Over 28% of women requiring immediate or short-term follow-up did not receive this care within three months of the recommended return date. African-American race/ethnicity, pain during the mammogram, and lack of a usual provider were significant independent predictors of inadequate follow-up. Although many factors were examined, the observed race difference was unexplained.
CONCLUSIONS: While inadequate follow-up of abnormal exams undermines the potential benefits of mammography screening for all women, the observed race difference in this study may have implications for the persistent race difference in breast cancer stage at diagnosis and survival. More research is needed to identify factors that contribute to poor follow-up among African-American women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16132791     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-005-2905-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  49 in total

1.  The impact of obesity on follow-up after an abnormal screening mammogram.

Authors:  Ellen A Schur; Joann E Elmore; Tracy Onega; Karen J Wernli; Edward A Sickles; Sebastien Haneuse
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Urban women's preferences for learning of their mammogram result: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Erin N Marcus; Darlene Drummond; Noella Dietz
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Adequacy of communicating results from screening mammograms to African American and White women.

Authors:  Beth A Jones; Kam Reams; Lisa Calvocoressi; Amy Dailey; Stanislav V Kasl; Nancy M Liston
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-01-31       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Does gender discrimination impact regular mammography screening? Findings from the race differences in screening mammography study.

Authors:  Amy B Dailey; Stanislav V Kasl; Beth A Jones
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Predictors and barriers to timely medical follow-up after cardiovascular disease risk factor screening according to race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Dana J Edelman; Qian Gao; Lori Mosca
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Racial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogram.

Authors:  Rebecca Press; Olveen Carrasquillo; Robert R Sciacca; Elsa-Grace V Giardina
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  Older Adult Health in Alabama's Black Belt Region.

Authors:  Brad Lian; Yu-Mei Schoenberger; Connie Kohler
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  How do breast imaging centers communicate results to women with limited English proficiency and other barriers to care?

Authors:  Erin N Marcus; Tulay Koru-Sengul; Feng Miao; Monica Yepes; Lee Sanders
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2014-06

9.  Diagnostic resolution of cancer screening abnormalities at community health centers.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Ji-Hyun Lee; Ercilia R Calcano; Cathy D Meade; William J Fulp; Kristen J Wells
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-08

10.  Predictors of timely follow-up after abnormal cancer screening among women seeking care at urban community health centers.

Authors:  Tracy A Battaglia; M Christina Santana; Sharon Bak; Manjusha Gokhale; Timothy L Lash; Arlene S Ash; Richard Kalish; Stephen Tringale; James O Taylor; Karen M Freund
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.