Literature DB >> 11913611

Disparities in adherence to recommended followup on screening mammography: interaction of sociodemographic factors.

Jadwiga Jodi Strzelczyk1, Mark B Dignan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine disparities in adherence to screening mammography and, specifically, to investigate whether race/ethnicity, education, age, health insurance, and family history of breast cancer (FHBC), as unique factors and in interactions, influence adherence to recommended follow up on screening mammography.
DESIGN: The study involved retrieval and analyses of data collected by the Colorado Mammography Project (CMAP) for 167,232 diverse (82.8% White, 3.4% Black, 11% Hispanic, 1.6% Asian, 0.6% Native American, and 0.6% "other") screening participants during the 1990-1997 study period.
METHODS: Subjects' first mammograms captured by CMAP were tracked in the database to identify women who received follow-up recommendations, women who adhered within 12 months and those that did not. Analyses included comparisons of adherence rates among women with various sociodemographic characteristics.
RESULTS: Of the 17,358 women who received follow-up recommendations, 80.7% adhered. Overall, non-White women in each of the racial/ethnic groups were less likely to adhere to recommendations than were White women (P<.05). Also less likely to adhere were the younger, less educated, uninsured/underinsured, and women who reported not having FHBC.
CONCLUSION: Race/ethnicity appeared to interact with age, education, health insurance, and FHBC to influence the probability of adherence, suggesting the need to explore further cultural, psychosocial, and situational factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11913611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethn Dis        ISSN: 1049-510X            Impact factor:   1.847


  31 in total

1.  Racial disparities in breast cancer mortality in a multiethnic cohort in the Southeast.

Authors:  Swann Arp Adams; William M Butler; Jeanette Fulton; Sue P Heiney; Edith M Williams; Alexandria F Delage; Leepao Khang; James R Hebert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Psychosocial determinants of mammography follow-up after receipt of abnormal mammography results in medically underserved women.

Authors:  Alecia Malin Fair; Debra Wujcik; Jin-Mann Sally Lin; Wei Zheng; Kathleen M Egan; Ana M Grau; Victoria L Champion; Kenneth A Wallston
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2010-02

3.  Having health insurance does not eliminate race/ethnicity-associated delays in breast cancer diagnosis in the District of Columbia.

Authors:  Heather J Hoffman; Nancy L LaVerda; Paul H Levine; Heather A Young; Lisa M Alexander; Steven R Patierno
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Clinic type and patient characteristics affecting time to resolution after an abnormal cancer-screening exam.

Authors:  Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Michelle L Kurta; Rory C Weier; Greg S Young; Autumn B Carey; Cathy M Tatum; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  What influences diagnostic delay in low-income women with breast cancer?

Authors:  Rose C Maly; Barbara Leake; Cynthia M Mojica; Yihang Liu; Allison L Diamant; Amardeep Thind
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Explaining black-white differences in receipt of recommended colon cancer treatment.

Authors:  Laura-Mae Baldwin; Sharon A Dobie; Kevin Billingsley; Yong Cai; George E Wright; Jason A Dominitz; William Barlow; Joan L Warren; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Breast cancer knowledge and barriers to mammography in a low-income managed care population.

Authors:  Nasar U Ahmed; Jane G Fort; Alecia Malin Fair; Kofi Semenya; Gillian Haber
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Peer navigation improves diagnostic follow-up after breast cancer screening among Korean American women: results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Annette E Maxwell; Angela M Jo; Catherine M Crespi; Madhuri Sudan; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Delay in diagnostic testing after abnormal mammography in low-income women.

Authors:  Debra Wujcik; Yu Shyr; Ming Li; Margaret F Clayton; Lee Ellington; Usha Menon; Kathi Mooney
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Patient barriers to follow-up care for breast and cervical cancer abnormalities.

Authors:  Silvia Tejeda; Julie S Darnell; Young I Cho; Melinda R Stolley; Talar W Markossian; Elizabeth A Calhoun
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.