Literature DB >> 17324095

Association of contextual factors and breast cancer screening: finding new targets to promote early detection.

David Litaker1, Anne Tomolo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disparities in breast cancer screening (BCS) exist within the United States. Although such factors as a woman's income and insurance status explain some differences, additional contributions related to local healthcare system characteristics or the social and economic context in which women live have not been fully explored.
METHODS: Using data from a cross-sectional survey of Ohio residents, we assessed BCS in a state-representative sample of 2231 women between the ages of 50 and 69 years. Urbanization, the proportion of female-headed households (FHH), managed care activity, the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) per capita, and county designation as being medically underserved represented some of the contextual characteristics we examined. Using nested hierarchical logistic regression models, we evaluated the association of these characteristics with BCS before and after adjusting for respondents' characteristics.
RESULTS: The proportion of age-eligible women screened for breast cancer was 61.9% (n = 1383); county screening rates varied from 12.9% to 100% (mean 60.3%). Failure to complete high school, lower family income, and absence of continuous insurance, a usual source of care, or current employment were associated with lower BCS. After accounting for these characteristics, per capita PCPs (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.05 (1.01, 1.10), p = 0.02) and the proportion of FHH (AOR 0.66 (0.44, 0.99), p = 0.045) remained independently associated with BCS.
CONCLUSIONS: Contextual characteristics independently associated with BCS identify areas in which women are at increased risk for delayed breast cancer diagnosis. The approach described here can inform the planning phase of regional, state, or federal initiatives to enhance BCS and reduce subsequent disparities in treatment outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17324095     DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2006.0090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)        ISSN: 1540-9996            Impact factor:   2.681


  26 in total

1.  Associations of physician supplies with colon cancer care in Ontario and California, 1996 to 2006.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Isaac N Luginaah; Emma Bartfay; Karen Y Fung; Eric J Holowaty; Frances C Wright; Caroline Hamm; Sindu M Kanjeekal; Madhan K Balagurusamy
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Association between documented family history of cancer and screening for breast and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Jean P O'Malley; Andrea Gough; David I Buckley; James Wallace; Lyle J Fagnan; Cynthia Morris; Motomi Mori; John D Heintzman; David Lieberman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  How sensitive are multilevel regression findings to defined area of context?: a case study of mammography use in California.

Authors:  Lee R Mobley; Tzy-Mey May Kuo; Linda Andrews
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.929

4.  Rural Residents' Perspectives on Multiple Morbidity Management and Disease Prevention.

Authors:  Shoshana H Bardach; Nancy E Schoenberg; Yelena N Tarasenko; Steven T Fleming
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2011-12

5.  Multilevel analysis of the determinants of receipt of clinical preventive services among reproductive-age women.

Authors:  Jennifer S McCall-Hosenfeld; Carol S Weisman; Fabian Camacho; Marianne M Hillemeier; Cynthia H Chuang
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2012-01-24

6.  Implementation and spread of interventions into the multilevel context of routine practice and policy: implications for the cancer care continuum.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Yano; Lawrence W Green; Karen Glanz; John Z Ayanian; Brian S Mittman; Veronica Chollette; Lisa V Rubenstein
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2012-05

7.  Inter- and intra-provincial variation in screen-detected breast cancer across five Canadian provinces: a CanIMPACT study.

Authors:  Marcy Winget; Yan Yuan; Mary L McBride; Cynthia Kendell; Kathleen M Decker; Eva Grunfeld; Patti A Groome
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2020-02-04

8.  Breast Cancer Screening for Patients of Rural Accountable Care Organization Clinics: A Multi-Level Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators.

Authors:  Hongmei Wang; Abbey Gregg; Fang Qiu; Jungyoon Kim; Baojiang Chen; Neng Wan; Dejun Su; Tzeyu Michaud; Li-Wu Chen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2018-04

Review 9.  Rural residence and cancer outcomes in the United States: issues and challenges.

Authors:  Ashley Meilleur; S V Subramanian; Jesse J Plascak; James L Fisher; Electra D Paskett; Elizabeth B Lamont
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Associations between contextual factors and colorectal cancer screening in a racially and ethnically diverse population in Texas.

Authors:  William A Calo; Sally W Vernon; David R Lairson; Stephen H Linder
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.