Literature DB >> 26902090

Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a CUSUM Analysis.

Mingjun Wang1, Lingwei Meng1, Yunqiang Cai1, Yongbin Li1, Xin Wang1, Zhaoda Zhang2, Bing Peng3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD), an advanced minimally invasive technique, has demonstrated advantages to open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). However, this complex procedure requires a relatively long training period to ensure technical proficiency. This study was therefore designed to analyze the learning curve for LPD.
METHODS: From October 2010 to September 2015, 63 standard pancreaticoduodenectomy procedures were to be performed laparoscopically by a single surgeon at the Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 57 patients were included in the study. Data for all the patients, including preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables, were prospectively collected and analyzed. The learning curve for LPD was evaluated using both cumulative sum (CUSUM) and risk-adjusted CUSUM (RA-CUSUM) methods. All of the variables among the learning curve phases were compared.
RESULTS: Based on the CUSUM and the RA-CUSUM analyses, the learning curve for LPD was grouped into three phases: phase I was the initial learning period (cases 1-11), phase II represented the technical competence period (cases 12-38), and phase III was regarded as the challenging period (cases 39-57). The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative ICU demand significantly decreased with the learning curve. More lymph nodes were collected after the initial learning period. There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative complications or the 30-day mortality among the three phases. More challenging cases were encountered in phase III.
CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, the learning curve for LPD consisted of three phases. Conservatively, to attain technical competence for performing LPD, a minimum of 40 cases are required for laparoscopic surgeons with a degree of laparoscopic experience.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CUSUM; Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy; Learning curve; RA-CUSUM

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26902090     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-016-3105-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  36 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial of pylorus-preserving duodenopancreatectomy versus classical Whipple resection-long term results.

Authors:  C A Seiler; M Wagner; T Bachmann; C A Redaelli; B Schmied; W Uhl; H Friess; M W Büchler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Effect of hospital volume on outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy in Italy.

Authors:  G Balzano; A Zerbi; G Capretti; S Rocchetti; V Capitanio; V Di Carlo
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Matched Case-Control Analysis Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Pylorus-preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients With Periampullary Tumors.

Authors:  Ki Byung Song; Song Cheol Kim; Dae Wook Hwang; Jae Hoon Lee; Dong Joo Lee; Jung Woo Lee; Kwang-Min Park; Young-Joo Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Defining the learning curve for team-based laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Paul J Speicher; Daniel P Nussbaum; Rebekah R White; Sabino Zani; Paul J Mosca; Dan G Blazer; Bryan M Clary; Theodore N Pappas; Douglas S Tyler; Alexander Perez
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Mingjun Wang; Hua Zhang; Zhong Wu; Zhaoda Zhang; Bing Peng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Multidimensional analyses of the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: 3-phase learning process comparison.

Authors:  Eun Jung Park; Chang Woo Kim; Min Soo Cho; Seung Hyuk Baik; Dong Wook Kim; Byung Soh Min; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Defining the learning curve in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a CUSUM analysis.

Authors:  Allan Okrainec; Lorenzo E Ferri; Liane S Feldman; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches?

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; Michael B Farnell; Florencia G Que; K Marie Reid-Lombardo; Mark J Truty; David M Nagorney; Michael L Kendrick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  The learning curve for the laparoscopic approach to conservative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons drawn from a single institution's experience.

Authors:  Thierry Bege; Bernard Lelong; Benjamin Esterni; Olivier Turrini; Jerôme Guiramand; Daniel Francon; Djamel Mokart; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Marc Giovannini; Jean Robert Delpero
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  30 in total

1.  The feasibility of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy-a stepwise procedure and learning curve.

Authors:  Chien-Hung Liao; Yu-Yin Liu; Shang-Yu Wang; Keng-Hao Liu; Chun-Nan Yeh; Ta-Sen Yeh
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; Zhi-Ming Zhao; Yuan-Xing Gao; Wan Yee Lau; Rong Liu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Can physician gestalt predict survival in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  Linda M Pak; Mithat Gonen; Kenneth Seier; Vinod P Balachandran; Michael I D'Angelica; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham; Peter J Allen; Richard K G Do; Amber L Simpson
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2018-08

4.  First experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Singapore.

Authors:  Tze-Yi Low; Ye-Xin Koh; Brian Kp Goh
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 1.858

5.  The surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: a comparative study of a single center.

Authors:  Rong Liu; Tao Zhang; Zhi-Ming Zhao; Xiang-Long Tan; Guo-Dong Zhao; Xuan Zhang; Yong Xu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Is there any role for minimally invasive surgery in NET?

Authors:  M Thomaschewski; H Neeff; T Keck; H P H Neumann; T Strate; E von Dobschuetz
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.514

7.  The role of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy-how take care of patient security?

Authors:  Trond A Buanes
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-07

8.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: lessons learned from 500 consecutive patients in a single center.

Authors:  Ki Byung Song; Song Cheol Kim; Woohyung Lee; Dae Wook Hwang; Jae Hoon Lee; Jaewoo Kwon; Yejong Park; Seung Jae Lee; Guisuk Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Improving patient safety during introduction of novel medical devices through cumulative summation analysis.

Authors:  Vejay N Vakharia; Roman Rodionov; Andrew W McEvoy; Anna Miserocchi; Rachel Sparks; Aidan G O'Keeffe; Sebastien Ourselin; John S Duncan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open?

Authors:  Andrew A Gumbs; Elie Chouillard; Mohamed Abu Hilal; Roland Croner; Brice Gayet; Michel Gagner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.