Literature DB >> 30483970

The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center.

Tao Zhang1, Zhi-Ming Zhao2, Yuan-Xing Gao2, Wan Yee Lau3, Rong Liu4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is one of the most technically difficult abdominal operations. Recent advances have allowed surgeons to attempt PD using minimally invasive surgery techniques. This retrospective study aimed to analyze the learning curve of a single surgeon who had carried out his first 100 robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) in a high-volume pancreatic center.
METHODS: The data on consecutive patients who underwent RPD for malignant or benign pathologies were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. The data included the demographic data, operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative length of hospital stay, morbidity rate, mortality rate, and final pathological results. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was used to identify the inflexion points which corresponded to the learning curve.
RESULTS: Between 2012 and 2016, 100 patients underwent RPD by a single surgeon. From the CUSUM operation time (CUSUM OT) learning curve, two distinct phases of the learning process were identified (early 40 patients and late 60 patients). The operation time (mean, 418 min vs. 317 min), hospital stay (mean, 22 days vs. 15 days), and estimated blood loss (mean, 227 ml vs. 134 ml) were significantly lower after the first 40 patients (P < 0.05). The pancreatic fistula, postoperative hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, and reoperation rates also decreased in the late 60 patients group (P < 0.05). Non-significant reductions were observed in the incidences of major (Clavien-Dindo Grade II or higher) morbidity, postoperative death, bile leakage, gastric fistula, wound infection, and open conversion.
CONCLUSIONS: RPD was technically feasible and safe in selected patients. The learning curve was completed after 40 RPD. Further studies are required to confirm the long-term oncological outcomes of RPD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Da Vinci; Learning curve; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30483970     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6595-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  33 in total

1.  Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection.

Authors:  S Chalikonda; J R Aguilar-Saavedra; R M Walsh
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Systemic Review of the Feasibility and Advantage of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Chien-Hung Liao; Yu-Tung Wu; Yu-Yin Liu; Shang-Yu Wang; Shih-Ching Kang; Chun-Nan Yeh; Ta-Sen Yeh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Minimally-invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Camilo Correa-Gallego; Helen E Dinkelspiel; Isabel Sulimanoff; Sarah Fisher; Eduardo F Viñuela; T Peter Kingham; Yuman Fong; Ronald P DeMatteo; Michael I D'Angelica; William R Jarnagin; Peter J Allen
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Challenges of minimally invasive pancreas surgery growth with such a high learning curve.

Authors:  Barish H Edil; Richard D Schulick
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy--a comparative study.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; George P C Yang; Chung Ngai Tang
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 7.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus open approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hang Zhang; XiangHu Wu; Feng Zhu; Ming Shen; Rui Tian; ChengJian Shi; Xin Wang; GuangQin Xiao; XingJun Guo; Min Wang; RenYi Qin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Does minimally-invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy have advantages over its open method? A meta-analysis of retrospective studies.

Authors:  Han Qin; Jianguo Qiu; Yiyang Zhao; Gang Pan; Yong Zeng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The state of the art of robotic pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Marco Del Chiaro; Ralf Segersvärd
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery - a review.

Authors:  Isacco Damoli; Giovanni Butturini; Marco Ramera; Salvatore Paiella; Giovanni Marchegiani; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 1.195

View more
  24 in total

1.  Combination of anterior superior mesenteric vein-first and right posterior superior mesenteric artery-first approaches for uncinate process dissection in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ronggui Lin; Xianchao Lin; Fengchun Lu; Yuanyuan Yang; Congfei Wang; Haizong Fang; Shi Wen; Yanchang Chen; Heguang Huang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

2.  Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Propensity-Matched Analysis to Open and Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  A Floortje van Oosten; Ding Ding; Joseph R Habib; Ahmer Irfan; Ryan K Schmocker; Elisabetta Sereni; Benedict Kinny-Köster; Michael Wright; Vincent P Groot; I Quintus Molenaar; John L Cameron; Martin Makary; Richard A Burkhart; William R Burns; Christopher L Wolfgang; Jin He
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancers: outcomes of 799 consecutive cases in a single institution.

Authors:  Toshiyasu Ojima; Katsunari Takifuji; Masaki Nakamura; Mikihito Nakamori; Keiji Hayata; Junya Kitadani; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robot-Assisted Pancreatic Surgery: A Structured Approach to Standardization of a Program and of the Operation.

Authors:  Charlotte Friederieke Müller-Debus; Michael Thomaschewski; Markus Zimmermann; Ulrich F Wellner; Dirk Bausch; Tobias Keck
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-03-17

Review 5.  Robotic pancreas surgery: an overview of history and update on technique, outcomes, and financials.

Authors:  Hussein H Khachfe; Joseph R Habib; Salem Al Harthi; Amal Suhool; Ali H Hallal; Faek R Jamali
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-08-06

6.  Perioperative outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single surgeon's experience with 55 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Ronggui Lin; Xianchao Lin; Maoen Pan; Fengchun Lu; Yuanyuan Yang; Congfei Wang; Haizong Fang; Yanchang Chen; Heguang Huang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

7.  Robotic-assisted versus open total pancreatectomy: a propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Yuanchi Weng; Mengmin Chen; Georgios Gemenetzis; Yusheng Shi; Xiayang Ying; Xiaxing Deng; Chenghong Peng; Jiabin Jin; Baiyong Shen
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.293

8.  Formal robotic training diminishes the learning curve for robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: Implications for new programs in complex robotic surgery.

Authors:  Carl R Schmidt; Britney R Harris; Kelsey A Musgrove; Pavan Rao; J Wallis Marsh; Alan A Thomay; Melissa E Hogg; Herbert J Zeh; Amer H Zureikat; Brian A Boone
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 9.  Short-term and long term morbidity in robotic pancreatic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Francesco Serra; Isabella Bonaduce; Nicola De Ruvo; Nicola Cautero; Roberta Gelmini
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-05

10.  Effectiveness and stability of robot-assisted anastomosis in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Sung Eun Park; Ho Joong Choi; Young Kyoung You; Tae Ho Hong
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 1.859

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.