Literature DB >> 33146810

The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open?

Andrew A Gumbs1, Elie Chouillard1, Mohamed Abu Hilal2, Roland Croner3, Brice Gayet4, Michel Gagner5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although early series focused on benign disease, minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) might be particularly suited for malignancy. Unlike their predecessors, fellowship-trained (FT) Hepatic-Pancreatic and Biliary (HPB) surgeons usually have equal skills in approaching peri-ampullary tumors (PT) either openly or via minimally invasive (MI) techniques.
METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed a MI-HPB-FT surgeon's 10-year experience with PD. A sub-analysis of malignant PT was also done (MIPD-PT vs. OPD-PT). The primary endpoint was to assess postoperative mortality and morbidity. Secondary endpoints included operative parameters, length of hospital stay, and survival analysis. Moreover, we addressed practice pattern changes for a surgeon straight out of training with no previous experience of independent surgery.
RESULTS: From December 2007-February 2018, one MI-HPB-FT performed a total of 100 PDs, including 57 MIPDs and 43 open PDs (OPDs). In both groups, over 70% of PDs were undertaken for malignancy. Eight patients with borderline resectable pancreatic ductal cancer (PDC) were in the OPD-PT group (as compared to only 2 in the MIPD-PT group) (p = 0.07). Estimated mean blood loss and length of stay were less in the MIPD-PT group (345 mL and 12 days) as compared to the OPD-PT group (971 mL and 16 days), p < 0.001 and p = 0.007, respectively. However, the mean operative time was longer for the MIPD-PT (456 min) as compared to the OPD-PT (371 min), p < 0.001. Thirty and 90-day mortality was 2.6%/5.1% after MIPD-PT compared to 0%/3.2% after OPD-PT, respectively, p = 1. Overall 30-/90-day morbidity rates were similar at 41.0%/43.6% after MIPD-PT and 35.5%/41.9% after OPD-PT, respectively, p = 0.8 and 1. Complete resection (R0) rates were not statistically different, 97.4% after MIPD-PT compared to 87.0% after OPD-PT (p = 0.2). After MIPD and OPD for malignant PT, overall 1, 3 and 5-year survival rates, and median survival were 82.5%, 59.6% and 46.3% and 38 months as compared to 52.5%, 15.7% and 10.5% and 13 months, respectively (p = 0.01). In the MIDP-PT group, recurrence free survival (RFS) at 1, 3 and 5 years and median RFS were 69.1%, 41.9% and 33.5% and 26 months as compared to 50.4%, 6.3% and 6.3% and 13 months, in the OPD-PT group, respectively (p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: FT HPB Surgeons who begin their practice with the ability to do both MI and OPD may preferentially approach resectable peri-ampullary tumors minimally invasively. This may result in decreased blood loss decreased length of hospital stays. Despite longer operative time, the improved visualization of MI techniques may enable superior R0 rates when compared to historical open controls. Moreover, combined with quicker initiation of adjuvant chemotherapeutic treatments, this may eventually result in improved survival.
© 2020. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatobiliary; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; Pancreatic resection; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatoduodenectomy; Robotic; Whipple procedure

Year:  2020        PMID: 33146810     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08118-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  67 in total

1.  The laparoscopic duodenopancreatectomy: the posterior approach.

Authors:  Andrew A Gumbs; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic left pancreatectomy: current concepts.

Authors:  Mohammad Abu Hilal; Arjun S Takhar
Journal:  Pancreatology       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.996

3.  Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Between Laparoscopic and Open Approach for Pancreatoduodenectomy: The PADULAP Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ignasi Poves; Fernando Burdío; Olga Morató; Mar Iglesias; Aleksander Radosevic; Lucas Ilzarbe; Laura Visa; Luís Grande
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Chinnasamy Palanivelu; Kalpesh Jani; Palanisamy Senthilnathan; Ramasamy Parthasarathi; Subbaiah Rajapandian; Madathupalayam Velusamy Madhankumar
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours (LEOPARD-2): a multicentre, patient-blinded, randomised controlled phase 2/3 trial.

Authors:  Jony van Hilst; Thijs de Rooij; Koop Bosscha; David J Brinkman; Susan van Dieren; Marcel G Dijkgraaf; Michael F Gerhards; Ignace H de Hingh; Tom M Karsten; Daniel J Lips; Misha D Luyer; Olivier R Busch; Sebastiaan Festen; Marc G Besselink
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-01-24

6.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours.

Authors:  C Palanivelu; P Senthilnathan; S C Sabnis; N S Babu; S Srivatsan Gurumurthy; N Anand Vijai; V P Nalankilli; P Praveen Raj; R Parthasarathy; S Rajapandian
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy (LEOPARD): A Multicenter Patient-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Thijs de Rooij; Jony van Hilst; Hjalmar van Santvoort; Djamila Boerma; Peter van den Boezem; Freek Daams; Ronald van Dam; Cees Dejong; Eino van Duyn; Marcel Dijkgraaf; Casper van Eijck; Sebastiaan Festen; Michael Gerhards; Bas Groot Koerkamp; Ignace de Hingh; Geert Kazemier; Joost Klaase; Ruben de Kleine; Cornelis van Laarhoven; Misha Luyer; Gijs Patijn; Pascal Steenvoorde; Mustafa Suker; Moh'd Abu Hilal; Olivier Busch; Marc Besselink
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  M Gagner; A Pomp
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Costs and quality of life in a randomized trial comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomy (LEOPARD trial).

Authors:  J van Hilst; E A Strating; T de Rooij; F Daams; S Festen; B Groot Koerkamp; J M Klaase; M Luyer; M G Dijkgraaf; M G Besselink
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 10.  Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Benign and Malignant Disease: Review of the Literature.

Authors:  T de Rooij; R Sitarz; O R Busch; M G Besselink; M Abu Hilal
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.260

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Robotic live donor hysterectomy.

Authors:  Pernilla Dahm-Kähler; Niclas Kvarnström; Mats Brännström
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.