Literature DB >> 20040854

The learning curve for the laparoscopic approach to conservative mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: lessons drawn from a single institution's experience.

Thierry Bege1, Bernard Lelong, Benjamin Esterni, Olivier Turrini, Jerôme Guiramand, Daniel Francon, Djamel Mokart, Gilles Houvenaeghel, Marc Giovannini, Jean Robert Delpero.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine the most sensitive markers of the learning process for laparoscopic conservative mesorectal excision (LCME) for rectal cancer to (1) generate a relevant training program for junior surgeons and (2) define appropriate settings for prospective trials. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The learning process for the laparoscopic approach to treating rectal cancer has not yet been clearly described.
METHODS: Over a 42-month period, 127 patients received LCME at our institution. The procedure was performed or supervised by a single referent surgeon. The operative time, conversion to open procedure postoperative morbidity, microscopic margins, and local recurrence were thought to be the most relevant parameters related to the learning process. To give a comprehensive view of success, a single hybrid variable was generated. Curves were drawn using the moving average method for continuous variables and the CUSUM analysis was used for binary variables.
RESULTS: A slow but continuous decrease in operative time was observed over all the study period. The overall and surgical morbidities were the most sensitive markers. The conversion rate and R0-resection rate remained stable at 14.9% and 91%, respectively. The overall local recurrence rate was 4.7% at a median follow-up time of 40 months and was not affected by the learning process. The success rate reached a steady state after 50 patients.
CONCLUSION: Despite surgeons' early command of the conversion rate, the learning process for LCME affects morbidity for the first 50 patients operated on, but does not adversely affect the oncological results. Much emphasis should therefore be placed on technical training.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20040854     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b7fdb0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  41 in total

1.  Impact of anal decompression on anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Soo Young Lee; Chang Hyun Kim; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: are we there yet?

Authors:  Bradley J Champagne; Rohit Makhija
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Learning curve estimation in medical devices and procedures: hierarchical modeling.

Authors:  Usha S Govindarajulu; Marco Stillo; David Goldfarb; Michael E Matheny; Frederic S Resnic
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  SSAT State-of-the-Art Conference: Advances in the Management of Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Evie Carchman; Daniel I Chu; Gregory D Kennedy; Melanie Morris; Marc Dakermandji; John R T Monson; Laura Melina Fernandez; Rodrigo Oliva Perez; Alessandro Fichera; Marco E Allaix; David Liska
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Kaity Sng; Masayasu Hara; Jae-Won Shin; Byung-Eun Yoo; Kyung-Sook Yang; Seon-Hahn Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Initial experience of a surgical fellow in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery under training protocol and supervision: comparison of short-term results for 70 early cases (under supervision) and 73 late cases (without supervision).

Authors:  Ji-Hun Kim; In-Kyu Lee; Won-Kyung Kang; Seung-Teak Oh; Jun-Gi Kim; Yoon-Suk Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: use of the cumulative sum method.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Yusuke Kinugasa; Akio Shiomi; Sumito Sato; Yushi Yamakawa; Hiroyasu Kagawa; Hiroyuki Tomioka; Keita Mori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Is prior laparoscopy experience required for adaptation to robotic rectal surgery?: Feasibility of one-step transition from open to robotic surgery.

Authors:  Im-kyung Kim; Jeonghyun Kang; Yoon Ah Park; Nam Kyu Kim; Seung-Kook Sohn; Kang Young Lee
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Prophylactic transanal decompression tube versus non-prophylactic transanal decompression tube for anastomotic leakage prevention in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yun Yang; Ye Shu; Fangyu Su; Lin Xia; Baofeng Duan; Xiaoting Wu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Rosa M Jiménez-Rodríguez; José Manuel Díaz-Pavón; Fernando de la Portilla de Juan; Emilio Prendes-Sillero; Hisnard Cadet Dussort; Javier Padillo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.