Literature DB >> 25783837

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: single-surgeon experience.

Mingjun Wang1, Hua Zhang1, Zhong Wu1, Zhaoda Zhang1, Bing Peng2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Innovations in surgical strategies and technologies have facilitated laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD). However, data regarding the short-term and long-term results of LPD are sparse, and this procedure is the primary focus of the current study.
METHODS: Between October 2010 and October 2013, a total of 31 consecutive patients received LPD, including hand-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy, and laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. Data regarding short-term surgical outcomes and long-term oncological results were collected prospectively.
RESULTS: The median operative time was 515.0 min (interquartile range 465.0-585.0 min). The median intraoperative estimated blood loss was 260.0 mL (interquartile range 150.0-430.0 mL). Conversion to open pancreaticoduodenectomy was required in three patients (9.7%) due to intraoperative pneumoperitoneum intolerance (n = 1, 3.2%) and tumor adherence to the superior mesenteric vein (n = 2, 6.5%). No significant differences between the surgical approaches were observed in regard to intraoperative and postoperative data. Postoperative severe complications (Clavien ≥ III) were detected in three (9.7%) patients, including one grade C pancreatic fistula, one grade B postoperative bleeding event, and one afferent loop obstruction. There were no deaths within 30 days following LPD. The final pathological results revealed duodenal adenocarcinoma in 14 (45.2%) patients, ampullary adenocarcinoma in four (12.9%) patients, distal common bile duct cancer in six (19.4%) patients, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in five (16.1%) patients, gastrointestinal stroma tumor in one (3.2%) patient, and chronic pancreatitis in one (3.2%) patient. All patients suffering from tumors underwent R0 resection (n = 30, 100.0%), with the optimal number of collected lymph nodes (median: 13, interquartile range 11-19). At the most recent follow-up, 20 patients were still alive, and the 1-, and 3-year overall survival for patients with duodenal adenocarcinoma were 100.0 and 71.4%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, LPD is feasible and technically safe for highly selected patients and can offer acceptable oncological outcomes and long-term survival.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy; Oncology; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25783837     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4154-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  43 in total

1.  A non-randomized comparative study of laparoscopy-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy and open pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Tamotsu Kuroki; Tomohiko Adachi; Tatsuya Okamoto; Takashi Kanematsu
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr

2.  The laparoscopic duodenopancreatectomy: the posterior approach.

Authors:  Andrew A Gumbs; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Ten-year experience with 733 pancreatic resections: changing indications, older patients, and decreasing length of hospitalization.

Authors:  J H Balcom; D W Rattner; A L Warshaw; Y Chang; C Fernandez-del Castillo
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2001-04

4.  Outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy with pylorus preservation or with antrectomy in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  R E Jimenez; C Fernandez-del Castillo; D W Rattner; Y Chang; A L Warshaw
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Laparoscopic pancreatic resection.

Authors:  P Gentileschi; M Gagner
Journal:  Chir Ital       Date:  2001 May-Jun

6.  Can laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy be safely implemented?

Authors:  Amer H Zureikat; Jason A Breaux; Jennifer L Steel; Steven J Hughes
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Shinichi Sakuramoto; Keishi Yamashita; Shiro Kikuchi; Nobue Futawatari; Natsuya Katada; Masahiko Watanabe; Toshiyuki Okutomi; Guoqin Wang; Leon Bax
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective review of 19 cases.

Authors:  Raffaele Pugliese; Ildo Scandroglio; Fabio Sansonna; Dario Maggioni; Andrea Costanzi; Davide Citterio; Giovanni Carlo Ferrari; Stefano Di Lernia; Carmelo Magistro
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.719

9.  A matched-pair analysis of laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: oncological outcomes using Leeds Pathology Protocol.

Authors:  Abdul R Hakeem; Caroline S Verbeke; Alison Cairns; Amer Aldouri; Andrew M Smith; Krishna V Menon
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2014-08

10.  Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches?

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; Michael B Farnell; Florencia G Que; K Marie Reid-Lombardo; Mark J Truty; David M Nagorney; Michael L Kendrick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Systemic Review of the Feasibility and Advantage of Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Chien-Hung Liao; Yu-Tung Wu; Yu-Yin Liu; Shang-Yu Wang; Shih-Ching Kang; Chun-Nan Yeh; Ta-Sen Yeh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Learning Curve for Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a CUSUM Analysis.

Authors:  Mingjun Wang; Lingwei Meng; Yunqiang Cai; Yongbin Li; Xin Wang; Zhaoda Zhang; Bing Peng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Risk Factors and Management of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Single-center Experience.

Authors:  Zun-Xiang Ke; Jiong-Xin Xiong; Jin Hu; Heng-Yu Chen; Qin Li; Yi-Qing Li
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2019-12-16

Review 4.  Is there any role for minimally invasive surgery in NET?

Authors:  M Thomaschewski; H Neeff; T Keck; H P H Neumann; T Strate; E von Dobschuetz
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 5.  Stents for the prevention of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Zhiyong Dong; Jing Xu; Zhen Wang; Maxim S Petrov
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-06

6.  Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y duodenojejunostomy for annular pancreas in adults: case report and literature review.

Authors:  He Cai; Xin Wang; Yun-Qiang Cai; Yong-Bin Li; Ling-Wei Meng; Bing Peng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-06

7.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic outcomes and long-term survival.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Yucheng Zhou; Weiwei Jin; Qicong Zhu; Chao Lu; Nan Niu; Yuanyu Wang; Yiping Mou; Zheling Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Pancreatic cancer: Open or minimally invasive surgery?

Authors:  Yu-Hua Zhang; Cheng-Wu Zhang; Zhi-Ming Hu; De-Fei Hong
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Single-Surgeon Initial Experience.

Authors:  Mingjun Wang; Yunqiang Cai; Yongbin Li; Bing Peng
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 0.656

10.  Perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes following laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy after learning curve in the past 10 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qingbo Feng; Zechang Xin; Bo Zhu; Mingheng Liao; Wenwei Liao; Yong Zeng
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.