PURPOSE: This study examined interest in and attitudes toward genetic testing in 5 different population groups. METHODS: The survey included African American, Asian American, Latina, Native American, and Appalachian women with varying familial histories of breast cancer. A total of 49 women were interviewed in person. Descriptive and nonparametric statistical techniques were used to assess ethnic group differences. RESULTS: Overall, interest in testing was high. All groups endorsed more benefits than risks. There were group differences regarding endorsement of specific benefits and risks: testing to "follow doctor recommendations" (p=0.017), "concern for effects on family" (p=0.044), "distrust of modern medicine" (p=0.036), "cost" (p=0.025), and "concerns about communication of results to others" (p=0.032). There was a significant inverse relationship between interest and genetic testing cost (p<0.050), with the exception of Latinas, who showed the highest level of interest regardless of increasing cost. CONCLUSION: Cost may be an important barrier to obtaining genetic testing services, and participants would benefit by genetic counseling that incorporates the unique cultural values and beliefs of each group to create an individualized, culturally competent program. Further research about attitudes toward genetic testing is needed among Asian Americans, Native Americans, and Appalachians for whom data are severely lacking. Future study of the different Latina perceptions toward genetic testing are encouraged.
PURPOSE: This study examined interest in and attitudes toward genetic testing in 5 different population groups. METHODS: The survey included African American, Asian American, Latina, Native American, and Appalachian women with varying familial histories of breast cancer. A total of 49 women were interviewed in person. Descriptive and nonparametric statistical techniques were used to assess ethnic group differences. RESULTS: Overall, interest in testing was high. All groups endorsed more benefits than risks. There were group differences regarding endorsement of specific benefits and risks: testing to "follow doctor recommendations" (p=0.017), "concern for effects on family" (p=0.044), "distrust of modern medicine" (p=0.036), "cost" (p=0.025), and "concerns about communication of results to others" (p=0.032). There was a significant inverse relationship between interest and genetic testing cost (p<0.050), with the exception of Latinas, who showed the highest level of interest regardless of increasing cost. CONCLUSION: Cost may be an important barrier to obtaining genetic testing services, and participants would benefit by genetic counseling that incorporates the unique cultural values and beliefs of each group to create an individualized, culturally competent program. Further research about attitudes toward genetic testing is needed among Asian Americans, Native Americans, and Appalachians for whom data are severely lacking. Future study of the different Latina perceptions toward genetic testing are encouraged.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast Cancer; Ethnic Attitudes and Interest; Genetic Testing; Minorities; Special Population Groups
Authors: C Lerman; C Hughes; J L Benkendorf; B Biesecker; J Kerner; J Willison; N Eads; D Hadley; J Lynch Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Electra D Paskett; James L Fisher; Eugene J Lengerich; Nancy E Schoenberg; Stephenie K Kennedy; Mary Ellen Conn; Karen A Roberto; Sharon K Dwyer; Darla Fickle; Mark Dignan Journal: Oncologist Date: 2011
Authors: C Lerman; B Biesecker; J L Benkendorf; J Kerner; A Gomez-Caminero; C Hughes; M M Reed Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1997-01-15 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Samuel M Y Ho; Judy W C Ho; Cecilia L W Chan; Kedo Kwan; Yenny K Y Tsui Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Goli Samimi; Marcus Q Bernardini; Lawrence C Brody; Charlisse F Caga-Anan; Ian G Campbell; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Fergus J Couch; Michael Dean; Joanne A de Hullu; Susan M Domchek; Ronny Drapkin; Heather Spencer Feigelson; Michael Friedlander; Mia M Gaudet; Marline G Harmsen; Karen Hurley; Paul A James; Janice S Kwon; Felicitas Lacbawan; Stephanie Lheureux; Phuong L Mai; Leah E Mechanic; Lori M Minasian; Evan R Myers; Mark E Robson; Susan J Ramus; Lisa F Rezende; Patricia A Shaw; Thomas P Slavin; Elizabeth M Swisher; Masataka Takenaka; David D Bowtell; Mark E Sherman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jennifer L Young; Julie Mak; Talia Stanley; Michelle Bass; Mildred K Cho; Holly K Tabor Journal: Genet Med Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Roni Nitecki; Haley A Moss; Catherine H Watson; Diana L Urbauer; Alexander Melamed; Karen H Lu; Steven M Lipkin; Kenneth Offit; Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Melissa K Frey Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2020-12-18 Impact factor: 3.437