Literature DB >> 12750237

Decisional consideration of hereditary colon cancer genetic test results among Hong Kong chinese adults.

Samuel M Y Ho1, Judy W C Ho, Cecilia L W Chan, Kedo Kwan, Yenny K Y Tsui.   

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between psychosocial factors and the decisional consideration of genetic testing of hereditary colon cancer. Attitudes and beliefs about genetic testing, anxiety and depression levels, coping style, and optimism were used as psychosocial independent variables. Sixty-two registrants (61% males and 39% females) of the Hereditary Gastrointestinal Cancer Registry of the Queen Mary Hospital in Hong Kong completed a mail survey. Mean age of the respondents was 42 years (SD = 9.92 years, range: 18-68 years). Correlational analyses and regression analyses were used to examine the relationships between the dependent and independent variables. Participants were concerned about the well-being and reactions of their significant others even more than their own well-being in their decisional consideration processes. Those who had higher perceived risks of being a mutated carrier and higher depression levels tended to emphasize more on the negative consequences of learning the test results and sharing them with relatives. Besides, those who believed that having cancer was attributable to personal (e.g., stress) rather than environmental factors considered that the negative consequences were relatively more important than the positive gains in sharing their results with relatives. Our participants tended to be relational or interdependent oriented in their decisional consideration processes related to genetic testing of colon cancer. This result is consistent with the established interdependent orientation of Chinese. Participants with higher risk perception focused more on the negative consequences of genetic testing. Psychological counseling might help these patients to cope with their concerns about being diagnosed as gene carriers after genetic testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12750237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  11 in total

1.  Reproductive Decision-Making in MMR Mutation Carriers After Results Disclosure: Impact of Psychological Status in Childbearing Options.

Authors:  Jacqueline Duffour; Audrey Combes; Evelyne Crapez; Florence Boissière-Michot; Frédéric Bibeau; Pierre Senesse; Marc Ychou; Julie Courraud; Hélène de Forges; Lise Roca
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Race/ethnicity-based concerns over understanding cancer diagnosis and treatment plan.

Authors:  Pascal Jean-Pierre; Kevin Fiscella; Jennifer Griggs; Jean V Joseph; Gary Morrow; Jennifer Carroll; Samantha Hendren; Jason Purnell; Colmar Figueroa-Moseley; Philip Kuebler; Tarit K Banerjee; Jeffrey J Kirshner
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.798

3.  Attitudes Toward Breast Cancer Genetic Testing in Five Special Population Groups.

Authors:  Amelie G Ramirez; Patricia Chalela; Kipling J Gallion; Edgar Muñoz; Alan E Holden; Linda Burhansstipanov; Selina A Smith; Evaon Wong-Kim; Stephen W Wyatt; Lucina Suarez
Journal:  J Health Dispar Res Pract       Date:  2015

4.  Efficacy of the health belief model for predicting intention to pursue genetic testing for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Amanda Cyr; Tim Allen Dunnagan; George Haynes
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Syndromes in Hong Kong: a Registry's Perspective.

Authors:  Judy Wc Ho; Rockson Wei; Emily Ms Chan
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 2.857

6.  Hopefulness predicts resilience after hereditary colorectal cancer genetic testing: a prospective outcome trajectories study.

Authors:  Samuel M Y Ho; Judy W C Ho; George A Bonanno; Annie T W Chu; Emily M S Chan
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 7.  100 years Lynch syndrome: what have we learned about psychosocial issues?

Authors:  Eveline M A Bleiker; Mary Jane Esplen; Bettina Meiser; Helle Vendel Petersen; Andrea Farkas Patenaude
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 8.  Promoting resilience among parents and caregivers of children with cancer.

Authors:  Abby R Rosenberg; K Scott Baker; Karen L Syrjala; Anthony L Back; Joanne Wolfe
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  Hope-based intervention for individuals susceptible to colorectal cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Samuel Mun-yin Ho; Judy Wai-chu Ho; Barbara Ka-yan Pau; Bryant Pui-hung Hui; Rosa Sze-mun Wong; Annie Tsz-wai Chu
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 10.  Genetic testing for Lynch syndrome in the first year of colorectal cancer: a review of the psychological impact.

Authors:  Karin M Landsbergen; Judith B Prins; Han G Brunner; Floris W Kraaimaat; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.