Literature DB >> 33443030

Facilitated cascade testing (FaCT): a randomized controlled trial.

Roni Nitecki1, Haley A Moss2, Catherine H Watson2, Diana L Urbauer3, Alexander Melamed4, Karen H Lu1, Steven M Lipkin5, Kenneth Offit6, Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain1, Melissa K Frey7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Identifying mutation-carrying relatives of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes via cascade testing is an underused first step in primary cancer prevention. A feasibility study of facilitated genetic testing of at-risk relatives of patients with a known pathogenic mutation demonstrated encouraging uptake of cascade testing. PRIMARY
OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective is to compare the proportion of genetic testing of identified first-degree relatives of probands with a confirmed BRCA1/2 mutation randomized to a facilitated cascade testing strategy versus standard of care, proband-mediated, information sharing. STUDY HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that facilitated cascade testing will drive significantly higher uptake of genetic testing than the standard of care. TRIAL
DESIGN: The FaCT (Facilitated Cascade Testing) trial is a prospective multi-institutional randomized study comparing the efficacy of a multicomponent facilitated cascade testing intervention with the standard of care. Patients with a known BRCA1/2 mutation (probands) cared for at participating sites will be randomized. Probands randomized to the standard of care group will be instructed to share a family letter with their first-degree relatives and encourage them to complete genetic testing. First-degree relatives of probands randomized to the intervention arm will receive engagement strategies with a patient navigator, an educational video, and accessible genetic testing services. MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Adult participants who are first-degree relatives of a patient with a BRCA1/2 mutation and have not had prior genetic testing will be included. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: Analyses will assess the proportion of first-degree relatives identified by the proband who complete genetic testing by 6 months in the intervention arm versus the control arm. SAMPLE SIZE: One hundred and fifty probands with a BRCA1/2 mutation will be randomized. Each proband is expected to provide an average of 3 relatives, for an expected 450 participants. ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING
RESULTS: January 2024. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04613440. © IGCS and ESGO 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1 protein; BRCA2 protein; ovarian cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33443030      PMCID: PMC8603783          DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  39 in total

Review 1.  Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review.

Authors:  O C Ukoumunne; M C Gulliford; S Chinn; J A Sterne; P G Burney
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Sample size requirements for stratified cluster randomization designs.

Authors:  A Donner
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Racial and ethnic disparities in awareness of genetic testing for cancer risk.

Authors:  José A Pagán; Dejun Su; Lifeng Li; Katrina Armstrong; David A Asch
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  Amy P M Finch; Jan Lubinski; Pål Møller; Christian F Singer; Beth Karlan; Leigha Senter; Barry Rosen; Lovise Maehle; Parviz Ghadirian; Cezary Cybulski; Tomasz Huzarski; Andrea Eisen; William D Foulkes; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Peter Ainsworth; Nadine Tung; Henry T Lynch; Susan Neuhausen; Kelly A Metcalfe; Islay Thompson; Joan Murphy; Ping Sun; Steven A Narod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Disparities in gynecologic cancer genetics evaluation.

Authors:  Emily M Hinchcliff; Erica M Bednar; Karen H Lu; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Outcomes of a randomised controlled trial of a complex genetic counselling intervention to improve family communication.

Authors:  Jan Hodgson; Sylvia Metcalfe; Clara Gaff; Susan Donath; Martin B Delatycki; Ingrid Winship; Loane Skene; MaryAnne Aitken; Jane Halliday
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.

Authors:  C Lerman; B Biesecker; J L Benkendorf; J Kerner; A Gomez-Caminero; C Hughes; M M Reed
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Preparing individuals to communicate genetic test results to their relatives: report of a randomized control trial.

Authors:  Susan V Montgomery; Andrea M Barsevick; Brian L Egleston; Ruth Bingler; Karen Ruth; Suzanne M Miller; John Malick; Terrence P Cescon; Mary B Daly
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Meta-analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 penetrance.

Authors:  Sining Chen; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Underdiagnosis of Hereditary Breast Cancer: Are Genetic Testing Guidelines a Tool or an Obstacle?

Authors:  Peter D Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Kevin Hughes; Rakesh Patel; Barry Rosen; Gia Compagnoni; Paul Baron; Rache Simmons; Linda Ann Smith; Ian Grady; Michael Kinney; Cynara Coomer; Karen Barbosa; Dennis R Holmes; Eric Brown; Linsey Gold; Patricia Clark; Lee Riley; Samuel Lyons; Antonio Ruiz; Sadia Kahn; Heather MacDonald; Lisa Curcio; Mary Kay Hardwick; Shan Yang; Ed D Esplin; Robert L Nussbaum
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Impact of Proband Indication for Genetic Testing on the Uptake of Cascade Testing Among Relatives.

Authors:  Tara J Schmidlen; Sara L Bristow; Kathryn E Hatchell; Edward D Esplin; Robert L Nussbaum; Eden V Haverfield
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.772

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.