Literature DB >> 17397374

Information seeking and intentions to have genetic testing for hereditary cancers in rural and Appalachian Kentuckians.

Kimberly M Kelly1, James E Andrews, Donald O Case, Suzanne L Allard, J David Johnson.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Research is limited regarding the potential of genetic testing for cancer risk in rural Appalachia.
PURPOSE: This study examined perceptions of genetic testing in a population sample of Kentuckians, with a focus on Appalachian and rural differences. The goals were to examine cultural and psychosocial factors that may predict intentions to test for hereditary cancer, need for help with information seeking for decision making about genetic testing for hereditary cancer, and amount of help needed with information seeking for decision making about genetic testing for hereditary cancer in this population.
METHODS: Analysis of data from a general social survey of adults using random-digit dialing in Kentucky (N = 882).
FINDINGS: An ordinal regression found that younger age, having a family history of cancer, and greater worry predicted greater intentions to seek genetic testing. A logistic regression found that having more education, excellent subjective knowledge of genetics, and less worry about cancer predicted less need for help in seeking information about testing. An ordinal regression found that less subjective knowledge of genetics and greater worry predicted greater amount of help needed.
CONCLUSIONS: Additional counseling to explain limitations of genetic testing may be needed. Further, those with less knowledge about genetics and more worry about hereditary cancer may have greater need for help with information seeking for decision making, a need that may be further exacerbated by the lack of medical professionals, particularly genetic counselors, who may provide information about genetic testing in rural, Appalachian Kentucky.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17397374     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2007.00085.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  13 in total

1.  Preferences for genetic and behavioral health information: the impact of risk factors and disease attributions.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Colleen M McBride; Sharon Hensley Alford; Kimberly A Kaphingst
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2010-10

2.  Factors Associated with Interest in Gene-Panel Testing and Risk Communication Preferences in Women from BRCA1/2 Negative Families.

Authors:  Kristina G Flores; Laurie E Steffen; Christopher J McLouth; Belinda E Vicuña; Amanda Gammon; Wendy Kohlmann; Lucretia Vigil; Zoneddy R Dayao; Melanie E Royce; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Living post treatment: definitions of those with history and no history of cancer.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Neel Shah; Randi Shedlosky-Shoemaker; Kyle Porter; Doreen Agnese
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.442

4.  Rural Women's Perceptions About Cancer Disparities and Contributing Factors: a Call to Communication.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Kristine Zimmermann; Leslie R Carnahan; Ellen Paulsey; Cabral A Bigman; Manorama M Khare; Whitney Zahnd; Wiley D Jenkins
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Linking genetic counseling content to short-term outcomes in individuals at elevated breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Lee Ellington; Nancy Schoenberg; Parul Agarwal; Thomas Jackson; Stephanie Dickinson; Jame Abraham; Electra D Paskett; Howard Leventhal; Michael Andrykowski
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  An exploratory study of inactive health information seekers.

Authors:  Sujin Kim
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.046

7.  Attitudes Toward Breast Cancer Genetic Testing in Five Special Population Groups.

Authors:  Amelie G Ramirez; Patricia Chalela; Kipling J Gallion; Edgar Muñoz; Alan E Holden; Linda Burhansstipanov; Selina A Smith; Evaon Wong-Kim; Stephen W Wyatt; Lucina Suarez
Journal:  J Health Dispar Res Pract       Date:  2015

8.  Interest in genetic testing for modest changes in breast cancer risk: implications for SNP testing.

Authors:  K D Graves; B N Peshkin; G Luta; W Tuong; M D Schwartz
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Cancer recurrence worry, risk perception, and informational-coping styles among Appalachian cancer survivors.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Randi Shedlosky-Shoemaker; Kyle Porter; Philip Desimone; Michael Andrykowski
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2011

10.  Promotion of cancer family history awareness: Jameslink Cancer Risk Assessment Tool at community health fairs.

Authors:  Kimberly M Kelly; Kyle Porter; Amber Remy; Judith A Westman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.