Literature DB >> 26851134

Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.

Judy Strickland1, Qingda Zang1, Nicole Kleinstreuer1, Michael Paris1, David M Lehmann2, Neepa Choksi1, Joanna Matheson3, Abigail Jacobs4, Anna Lowit5, David Allen1, Warren Casey6.   

Abstract

One of the top priorities of the Interagency Coordinating Committee for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) is the identification and evaluation of non-animal alternatives for skin sensitization testing. Although skin sensitization is a complex process, the key biological events of the process have been well characterized in an adverse outcome pathway (AOP) proposed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Accordingly, ICCVAM is working to develop integrated decision strategies based on the AOP using in vitro, in chemico and in silico information. Data were compiled for 120 substances tested in the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA), direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA), human cell line activation test (h-CLAT) and KeratinoSens assay. Data for six physicochemical properties, which may affect skin penetration, were also collected, and skin sensitization read-across predictions were performed using OECD QSAR Toolbox. All data were combined into a variety of potential integrated decision strategies to predict LLNA outcomes using a training set of 94 substances and an external test set of 26 substances. Fifty-four models were built using multiple combinations of machine learning approaches and predictor variables. The seven models with the highest accuracy (89-96% for the test set and 96-99% for the training set) for predicting LLNA outcomes used a support vector machine (SVM) approach with different combinations of predictor variables. The performance statistics of the SVM models were higher than any of the non-animal tests alone and higher than simple test battery approaches using these methods. These data suggest that computational approaches are promising tools to effectively integrate data sources to identify potential skin sensitizers without animal testing. Published 2016. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2016. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DPRA; KeratinoSens; LLNA; allergic contact dermatitis; h-CLAT; integrated decision strategy; machine learning; skin sensitization; support vector machine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26851134      PMCID: PMC4945438          DOI: 10.1002/jat.3281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0260-437X            Impact factor:   3.446


  55 in total

1.  ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. The ICCVAM review process.

Authors:  D M Sailstad; D Hattan; R N Hill; W S Stokes
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens.

Authors:  G Frank Gerberick; Jeff D Vassallo; Ruth E Bailey; Joel G Chaney; Steve W Morrall; Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Predicting skin sensitization potential and inter-laboratory reproducibility of a human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) in the European Cosmetics Association (COLIPA) ring trials.

Authors:  Hitoshi Sakaguchi; Cindy Ryan; Jean-Marc Ovigne; Klaus R Schroeder; Takao Ashikaga
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Skin sensitizers induce antioxidant response element dependent genes: application to the in vitro testing of the sensitization potential of chemicals.

Authors:  Andreas Natsch; Roger Emter
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Probabilistic hazard assessment for skin sensitization potency by dose-response modeling using feature elimination instead of quantitative structure-activity relationships.

Authors:  Thomas Luechtefeld; Alexandra Maertens; James M McKim; Thomas Hartung; Andre Kleensang; Vanessa Sá-Rocha
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.446

6.  Predictive performance for human skin sensitizing potential of the human cell line activation test (h-CLAT).

Authors:  Yuko Nukada; Takao Ashikaga; Hitoshi Sakaguchi; Sakiko Sono; Nanae Mugita; Morihiko Hirota; Masaaki Miyazawa; Yuichi Ito; Hitoshi Sasa; Naohiro Nishiyama
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization.

Authors:  Morihiko Hirota; Shiho Fukui; Kenji Okamoto; Satoru Kurotani; Noriyasu Imai; Miyuki Fujishiro; Daiki Kyotani; Yoshinao Kato; Toshihiko Kasahara; Masaharu Fujita; Akemi Toyoda; Daisuke Sekiya; Shinichi Watanabe; Hirokazu Seto; Osamu Takenouchi; Takao Ashikaga; Masaaki Miyazawa
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.446

8.  Prediction of skin sensitization potency of chemicals by human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) and an attempt at classifying skin sensitization potency.

Authors:  Yuko Nukada; Takao Ashikaga; Masaaki Miyazawa; Morihiko Hirota; Hitoshi Sakaguchi; Hitoshi Sasa; Naohiro Nishiyama
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Compilation of historical local lymph node data for evaluation of skin sensitization alternative methods.

Authors:  G Frank Gerberick; Cindy A Ryan; Petra S Kern; Harald Schlatter; Rebecca J Dearman; Ian Kimber; Grace Y Patlewicz; David A Basketter
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.845

10.  The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; Paul D Siegel; B J Meade
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-06-16
View more
  17 in total

1.  Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Qingda Zang; Michael Paris; David M Lehmann; Shannon Bell; Nicole Kleinstreuer; David Allen; Joanna Matheson; Abigail Jacobs; Warren Casey; Judy Strickland
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.446

Review 2.  Skin and respiratory chemical allergy: confluence and divergence in a hybrid adverse outcome pathway.

Authors:  Ian Kimber; Alan Poole; David A Basketter
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 3.  Laboratory Techniques for Identifying Causes of Allergic Dermatitis.

Authors:  Itai Chipinda; Stacey E Anderson; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.479

4.  Immunotoxicology: A brief history, current status and strategies for future immunotoxicity assessment.

Authors:  Dori Germolec; Robert Luebke; Andrew Rooney; Kelly Shipkowski; Rob Vandebriel; Henk van Loveren
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-08

Review 5.  Skin sensitization testing needs and data uses by US regulatory and research agencies.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; Amber B Daniel; David Allen; Cecilia Aguila; Surender Ahir; Simona Bancos; Evisabel Craig; Dori Germolec; Chandramallika Ghosh; Naomi L Hudson; Abigail Jacobs; David M Lehmann; Joanna Matheson; Emily N Reinke; Nakissa Sadrieh; Stanislav Vukmanovic; Nicole Kleinstreuer
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 6.  Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (II): an assessment of defined approaches *.

Authors:  Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Sebastian Hoffmann; Nathalie Alépée; David Allen; Takao Ashikaga; Warren Casey; Elodie Clouet; Magalie Cluzel; Bertrand Desprez; Nichola Gellatly; Carsten Göbel; Petra S Kern; Martina Klaric; Jochen Kühnl; Silvia Martinozzi-Teissier; Karsten Mewes; Masaaki Miyazawa; Judy Strickland; Erwin van Vliet; Qingda Zang; Dirk Petersohn
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.635

7.  A dual luciferase assay for evaluation of skin sensitizing potential of medical devices.

Authors:  Elisabeth Mertl; Elisabeth Riegel; Nicole Glück; Gabriele Ettenberger-Bornberg; Grace Lin; Sabrina Auer; Magdalena Haller; Angelika Wlodarczyk; Christoph Steurer; Christian Kirchnawy; Thomas Czerny
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  Multivariate models for prediction of human skin sensitization hazard.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; Qingda Zang; Michael Paris; David M Lehmann; David Allen; Neepa Choksi; Joanna Matheson; Abigail Jacobs; Warren Casey; Nicole Kleinstreuer
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.446

9.  Predicting the Probability that a Chemical Causes Steatosis Using Adverse Outcome Pathway Bayesian Networks (AOPBNs).

Authors:  Lyle D Burgoon; Michelle Angrish; Natalia Garcia-Reyero; Nathan Pollesch; Anze Zupanic; Edward Perkins
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 4.302

10.  QSAR models of human data can enrich or replace LLNA testing for human skin sensitization.

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Stephen J Capuzzi; Eugene Muratov; Rodolpho C Braga; Thomas Thornton; Denis Fourches; Judy Strickland; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Carolina H Andrade; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Green Chem       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 10.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.