Literature DB >> 29474122

Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (II): an assessment of defined approaches *.

Nicole C Kleinstreuer1, Sebastian Hoffmann2, Nathalie Alépée3, David Allen4, Takao Ashikaga5, Warren Casey1, Elodie Clouet6, Magalie Cluzel7, Bertrand Desprez8, Nichola Gellatly9, Carsten Göbel10, Petra S Kern11, Martina Klaric8, Jochen Kühnl12, Silvia Martinozzi-Teissier3, Karsten Mewes13, Masaaki Miyazawa14, Judy Strickland4, Erwin van Vliet15, Qingda Zang4, Dirk Petersohn13.   

Abstract

Skin sensitization is a toxicity endpoint of widespread concern, for which the mechanistic understanding and concurrent necessity for non-animal testing approaches have evolved to a critical juncture, with many available options for predicting sensitization without using animals. Cosmetics Europe and the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods collaborated to analyze the performance of multiple non-animal data integration approaches for the skin sensitization safety assessment of cosmetics ingredients. The Cosmetics Europe Skin Tolerance Task Force (STTF) collected and generated data on 128 substances in multiple in vitro and in chemico skin sensitization assays selected based on a systematic assessment by the STTF. These assays, together with certain in silico predictions, are key components of various non-animal testing strategies that have been submitted to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development as case studies for skin sensitization. Curated murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) and human skin sensitization data were used to evaluate the performance of six defined approaches, comprising eight non-animal testing strategies, for both hazard and potency characterization. Defined approaches examined included consensus methods, artificial neural networks, support vector machine models, Bayesian networks, and decision trees, most of which were reproduced using open source software tools. Multiple non-animal testing strategies incorporating in vitro, in chemico, and in silico inputs demonstrated equivalent or superior performance to the LLNA when compared to both animal and human data for skin sensitization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LLNA reference data; Skin sensitization; adverse outcome pathway; defined approaches; hazard assessment; human reference data; integrated testing strategy; new approach methodologies; potency assessment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29474122      PMCID: PMC7393691          DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1429386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  52 in total

1.  Integrating non-animal test information into an adaptive testing strategy - skin sensitization proof of concept case.

Authors:  Joanna Jaworska; Artsiom Harol; Petra S Kern; G Frank Gerberick
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.043

2.  Prospective multicentre study of the U-SENS test method for skin sensitization testing.

Authors:  N Alépée; C Piroird; M Aujoulat; S Dreyfuss; S Hoffmann; A Hohenstein; M Meloni; L Nardelli; C Gerbeix; J Cotovio
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.500

3.  Predicting skin sensitisation using a decision tree integrated testing strategy with an in silico model and in chemico/in vitro assays.

Authors:  Donna S Macmillan; Steven J Canipa; Martyn L Chilton; Richard V Williams; Christopher G Barber
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  From pathways to people: applying the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) for skin sensitization to risk assessment.

Authors:  Cameron MacKay; Michael Davies; Vicki Summerfield; Gavin Maxwell
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.043

5.  The Myeloid U937 Skin Sensitization Test (U-SENS) addresses the activation of dendritic cell event in the adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitization.

Authors:  Cécile Piroird; Jean-Marc Ovigne; Françoise Rousset; Silvia Martinozzi-Teissier; Charles Gomes; José Cotovio; Nathalie Alépée
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  An improvement of LLNA:DA to assess the skin sensitization potential of chemicals.

Authors:  Hongwei Zhang; Ying Shi; Chao Wang; Kangfeng Zhao; Shaoping Zhang; Lan Wei; Li Dong; Wen Gu; Yongjun Xu; Hongjie Ruan; Hong Zhi; Xiaoyan Yang
Journal:  J Toxicol Sci       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.196

7.  Does sensitization to contact allergens begin in infancy?

Authors:  A L Bruckner; W L Weston; J G Morelli
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; Qingda Zang; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Michael Paris; David M Lehmann; Neepa Choksi; Joanna Matheson; Abigail Jacobs; Anna Lowit; David Allen; Warren Casey
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.446

9.  The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; Paul D Siegel; B J Meade
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-06-16

10.  Standardisation of defined approaches for skin sensitisation testing to support regulatory use and international adoption: position of the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods.

Authors:  S Casati; K Aschberger; J Barroso; W Casey; I Delgado; T S Kim; N Kleinstreuer; H Kojima; J K Lee; A Lowit; H K Park; M J Régimbald-Krnel; J Strickland; M Whelan; Y Yang; Valérie Zuang
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 5.153

View more
  28 in total

1.  Evaluation of androgen assay results using a curated Hershberger database.

Authors:  N C Kleinstreuer; P Browne; X Chang; R Judson; W Casey; P Ceger; C Deisenroth; N Baker; K Markey; R S Thomas
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  Skin sensitization in silico protocol.

Authors:  Candice Johnson; Ernst Ahlberg; Lennart T Anger; Lisa Beilke; Romualdo Benigni; Joel Bercu; Sol Bobst; David Bower; Alessandro Brigo; Sarah Campbell; Mark T D Cronin; Ian Crooks; Kevin P Cross; Tatyana Doktorova; Thomas Exner; David Faulkner; Ian M Fearon; Markus Fehr; Shayne C Gad; Véronique Gervais; Amanda Giddings; Susanne Glowienke; Barry Hardy; Catrin Hasselgren; Jedd Hillegass; Robert Jolly; Eckart Krupp; Liat Lomnitski; Jason Magby; Jordi Mestres; Lawrence Milchak; Scott Miller; Wolfgang Muster; Louise Neilson; Rahul Parakhia; Alexis Parenty; Patricia Parris; Alexandre Paulino; Ana Theresa Paulino; David W Roberts; Harald Schlecker; Reinhard Stidl; Diana Suarez-Rodrigez; David T Szabo; Raymond R Tice; Daniel Urbisch; Anna Vuorinen; Brian Wall; Thibaud Weiler; Angela T White; Jessica Whritenour; Joerg Wichard; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.271

3.  Use of Lhasa Limited Products for the In Silico Prediction of Drug Toxicity.

Authors:  David J Ponting; Michael J Burns; Robert S Foster; Rachel Hemingway; Grace Kocks; Donna S MacMillan; Andrew L Shannon-Little; Rachael E Tennant; Jessica R Tidmarsh; David J Yeo
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  Safety assessment of cosmetics by read across applied to metabolomics data of in vitro skin and liver models.

Authors:  Carine Jacques; Emilien L Jamin; Isabelle Jouanin; Cécile Canlet; Marie Tremblay-Franco; Jean-François Martin; Daniel Zalko; Yves Brunel; Sandrine Bessou-Touya; Laurent Debrauwer; Pierre-Jacques Ferret; Hélène Duplan
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 5.153

5.  PreS/MD: Predictor of Sensitization Hazard for Chemical Substances Released From Medical Devices.

Authors:  Vinicius M Alves; Joyce V B Borba; Rodolpho C Braga; Daniel R Korn; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Kevin Causey; Alexander Tropsha; Diego Rua; Eugene N Muratov
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.109

6.  Application of Defined Approaches for Skin Sensitization to Agrochemical Products.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; James Truax; Marco Corvaro; Raja Settivari; Joseph Henriquez; Jeremy McFadden; Travis Gulledge; Victor Johnson; Sean Gehen; Dori Germolec; David G Allen; Nicole Kleinstreuer
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-02

Review 7.  Laboratory Techniques for Identifying Causes of Allergic Dermatitis.

Authors:  Itai Chipinda; Stacey E Anderson; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.479

Review 8.  Skin sensitization testing needs and data uses by US regulatory and research agencies.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; Amber B Daniel; David Allen; Cecilia Aguila; Surender Ahir; Simona Bancos; Evisabel Craig; Dori Germolec; Chandramallika Ghosh; Naomi L Hudson; Abigail Jacobs; David M Lehmann; Joanna Matheson; Emily N Reinke; Nakissa Sadrieh; Stanislav Vukmanovic; Nicole Kleinstreuer
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 5.153

9.  Integration of data across toxicity endpoints for improved safety assessment of chemicals: the example of carcinogenicity assessment.

Authors:  Federica Madia; Gelsomina Pillo; Andrew Worth; Raffaella Corvi; Pilar Prieto
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  Applying evidence-based methods to the development and use of adverse outcome pathways

Authors:  Rob B M De Vries; Michelle Angrish; Patience Browne; Jan Brozek; Andrew A Rooney; Daniele S Wikoff; Paul Whaley; Stephen W Edwards; Rebecca L Morgan; Ingrid L Druwe; Sebastian Hoffmann; Thomas Hartung; Kristina Thayer; Marc T Avey; Brandiese E J Beverly; Maicon Falavigna; Catherine Gibbons; Katy Goyak; Andrew Kraft; Fernando Nampo; Amir Qaseem; Meg Sears; Jasvinder A Singh; Catherine Willett; Erin Y Yost; Holger Schünemann; Katya Tsaioun
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 6.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.