| Literature DB >> 29474122 |
Nicole C Kleinstreuer1, Sebastian Hoffmann2, Nathalie Alépée3, David Allen4, Takao Ashikaga5, Warren Casey1, Elodie Clouet6, Magalie Cluzel7, Bertrand Desprez8, Nichola Gellatly9, Carsten Göbel10, Petra S Kern11, Martina Klaric8, Jochen Kühnl12, Silvia Martinozzi-Teissier3, Karsten Mewes13, Masaaki Miyazawa14, Judy Strickland4, Erwin van Vliet15, Qingda Zang4, Dirk Petersohn13.
Abstract
Skin sensitization is a toxicity endpoint of widespread concern, for which the mechanistic understanding and concurrent necessity for non-animal testing approaches have evolved to a critical juncture, with many available options for predicting sensitization without using animals. Cosmetics Europe and the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods collaborated to analyze the performance of multiple non-animal data integration approaches for the skin sensitization safety assessment of cosmetics ingredients. The Cosmetics Europe Skin Tolerance Task Force (STTF) collected and generated data on 128 substances in multiple in vitro and in chemico skin sensitization assays selected based on a systematic assessment by the STTF. These assays, together with certain in silico predictions, are key components of various non-animal testing strategies that have been submitted to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development as case studies for skin sensitization. Curated murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) and human skin sensitization data were used to evaluate the performance of six defined approaches, comprising eight non-animal testing strategies, for both hazard and potency characterization. Defined approaches examined included consensus methods, artificial neural networks, support vector machine models, Bayesian networks, and decision trees, most of which were reproduced using open source software tools. Multiple non-animal testing strategies incorporating in vitro, in chemico, and in silico inputs demonstrated equivalent or superior performance to the LLNA when compared to both animal and human data for skin sensitization.Entities:
Keywords: LLNA reference data; Skin sensitization; adverse outcome pathway; defined approaches; hazard assessment; human reference data; integrated testing strategy; new approach methodologies; potency assessment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29474122 PMCID: PMC7393691 DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1429386
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Crit Rev Toxicol ISSN: 1040-8444 Impact factor: 5.635