Literature DB >> 27480324

Multivariate models for prediction of human skin sensitization hazard.

Judy Strickland1, Qingda Zang1, Michael Paris1, David M Lehmann2, David Allen1, Neepa Choksi1, Joanna Matheson3, Abigail Jacobs4, Warren Casey5, Nicole Kleinstreuer5.   

Abstract

One of the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Method's (ICCVAM) top priorities is the development and evaluation of non-animal approaches to identify potential skin sensitizers. The complexity of biological events necessary to produce skin sensitization suggests that no single alternative method will replace the currently accepted animal tests. ICCVAM is evaluating an integrated approach to testing and assessment based on the adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitization that uses machine learning approaches to predict human skin sensitization hazard. We combined data from three in chemico or in vitro assays - the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA), human cell line activation test (h-CLAT) and KeratinoSens™ assay - six physicochemical properties and an in silico read-across prediction of skin sensitization hazard into 12 variable groups. The variable groups were evaluated using two machine learning approaches, logistic regression and support vector machine, to predict human skin sensitization hazard. Models were trained on 72 substances and tested on an external set of 24 substances. The six models (three logistic regression and three support vector machine) with the highest accuracy (92%) used: (1) DPRA, h-CLAT and read-across; (2) DPRA, h-CLAT, read-across and KeratinoSens; or (3) DPRA, h-CLAT, read-across, KeratinoSens and log P. The models performed better at predicting human skin sensitization hazard than the murine local lymph node assay (accuracy 88%), any of the alternative methods alone (accuracy 63-79%) or test batteries combining data from the individual methods (accuracy 75%). These results suggest that computational methods are promising tools to identify effectively the potential human skin sensitizers without animal testing. Published 2016. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. Published 2016. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DPRA; KeratinoSens; LLNA; Skin sensitization; allergic contact dermatitis (ACD); h-CLAT; integrated decision strategy; machine learning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27480324      PMCID: PMC5243794          DOI: 10.1002/jat.3366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0260-437X            Impact factor:   3.446


  53 in total

1.  ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. The ICCVAM review process.

Authors:  D M Sailstad; D Hattan; R N Hill; W S Stokes
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Contact allergy: the local lymph node assay for the prediction of hazard and risk.

Authors:  D A Basketter; C K Smith Pease; G Y Patlewicz
Journal:  Clin Exp Dermatol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.470

3.  Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens.

Authors:  G Frank Gerberick; Jeff D Vassallo; Ruth E Bailey; Joel G Chaney; Steve W Morrall; Jean-Pierre Lepoittevin
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Predicting skin sensitization potential and inter-laboratory reproducibility of a human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) in the European Cosmetics Association (COLIPA) ring trials.

Authors:  Hitoshi Sakaguchi; Cindy Ryan; Jean-Marc Ovigne; Klaus R Schroeder; Takao Ashikaga
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Probabilistic hazard assessment for skin sensitization potency by dose-response modeling using feature elimination instead of quantitative structure-activity relationships.

Authors:  Thomas Luechtefeld; Alexandra Maertens; James M McKim; Thomas Hartung; Andre Kleensang; Vanessa Sá-Rocha
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.446

6.  Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization.

Authors:  Morihiko Hirota; Shiho Fukui; Kenji Okamoto; Satoru Kurotani; Noriyasu Imai; Miyuki Fujishiro; Daiki Kyotani; Yoshinao Kato; Toshihiko Kasahara; Masaharu Fujita; Akemi Toyoda; Daisuke Sekiya; Shinichi Watanabe; Hirokazu Seto; Osamu Takenouchi; Takao Ashikaga; Masaaki Miyazawa
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.446

7.  Prediction of skin sensitization potency of chemicals by human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT) and an attempt at classifying skin sensitization potency.

Authors:  Yuko Nukada; Takao Ashikaga; Masaaki Miyazawa; Morihiko Hirota; Hitoshi Sakaguchi; Hitoshi Sasa; Naohiro Nishiyama
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 8.  Categorization of chemicals according to their relative human skin sensitizing potency.

Authors:  David A Basketter; Nathalie Alépée; Takao Ashikaga; João Barroso; Nicola Gilmour; Carsten Goebel; Jalila Hibatallah; Sebastian Hoffmann; Petra Kern; Silvia Martinozzi-Teissier; Gavin Maxwell; Kerstin Reisinger; Hitoshi Sakaguchi; Andreas Schepky; Magalie Tailhardat; Marie Templier
Journal:  Dermatitis       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.845

9.  The LLNA: A Brief Review of Recent Advances and Limitations.

Authors:  Stacey E Anderson; Paul D Siegel; B J Meade
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-06-16

10.  GeneSrF and varSelRF: a web-based tool and R package for gene selection and classification using random forest.

Authors:  Ramón Diaz-Uriarte
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-09-03       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  9 in total

1.  Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches.

Authors:  Qingda Zang; Michael Paris; David M Lehmann; Shannon Bell; Nicole Kleinstreuer; David Allen; Joanna Matheson; Abigail Jacobs; Warren Casey; Judy Strickland
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 3.446

2.  Development of a 96-Well Electrophilic Allergen Screening Assay for Skin Sensitization Using a Measurement Science Approach.

Authors:  Elijah J Petersen; Richard Uhl; Blaza Toman; John T Elliott; Judy Strickland; James Truax; John Gordon
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-05-17

3.  Immunotoxicology: A brief history, current status and strategies for future immunotoxicity assessment.

Authors:  Dori Germolec; Robert Luebke; Andrew Rooney; Kelly Shipkowski; Rob Vandebriel; Henk van Loveren
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-08

Review 4.  Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (II): an assessment of defined approaches *.

Authors:  Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Sebastian Hoffmann; Nathalie Alépée; David Allen; Takao Ashikaga; Warren Casey; Elodie Clouet; Magalie Cluzel; Bertrand Desprez; Nichola Gellatly; Carsten Göbel; Petra S Kern; Martina Klaric; Jochen Kühnl; Silvia Martinozzi-Teissier; Karsten Mewes; Masaaki Miyazawa; Judy Strickland; Erwin van Vliet; Qingda Zang; Dirk Petersohn
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 5.  Skin Sensitization Testing-What's Next?

Authors:  Gunilla Grundström; Carl A K Borrebaeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Predicting potential adverse events using safety data from marketed drugs.

Authors:  Chathuri Daluwatte; Peter Schotland; David G Strauss; Keith K Burkhart; Rebecca Racz
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence Applications in Dermatology: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Arieh Gomolin; Elena Netchiporouk; Robert Gniadecki; Ivan V Litvinov
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-03-31

8.  Titanium salts tested in reconstructed human skin with integrated MUTZ-3-derived Langerhans cells show an irritant rather than a sensitizing potential.

Authors:  Charlotte T Rodrigues Neves; Sander W Spiekstra; Niels P J de Graaf; Thomas Rustemeyer; Albert J Feilzer; Cees J Kleverlaan; Susan Gibbs
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 9.  Shelter from the cytokine storm: pitfalls and prospects in the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for an elderly population.

Authors:  Annalisa Ciabattini; Paolo Garagnani; Francesco Santoro; Rino Rappuoli; Claudio Franceschi; Donata Medaglini
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 9.623

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.