Literature DB >> 17932397

Skin sensitizers induce antioxidant response element dependent genes: application to the in vitro testing of the sensitization potential of chemicals.

Andreas Natsch1, Roger Emter.   

Abstract

Tests for skin sensitization are required prior to the market launch of new cosmetic ingredients and in vitro tests are needed to replace the current animal tests. Protein reactivity is the common feature of skin sensitizers and it is a crucial question whether a cellular in vitro assay can detect protein reactivity of diverse test chemicals. The signaling pathway involving the repressor protein Keap1 and the transcription factor nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2, which binds to the antioxidant response element (ARE) in the promoter of many phase II detoxification genes, is a potential cellular marker because Keap1 had been shown to be covalently modified by electrophiles which leads to activation of ARE-dependent genes. To evaluate whether this regulatory pathway can be used to develop a predictive cellular in vitro test for sensitization, 96 different chemicals of known skin sensitization potential were added to Hepa1C1C7 cells and the induction of the ARE-regulated quinone reductase (QR) activity was determined. In parallel, 102 chemicals were tested on the reporter cell line AREc32, which contains an eightfold repeat of the ARE sequence upstream of a luciferase gene. Among the strong/extreme skin sensitizers 14 out of 15 and 30 out of 34 moderate sensitizers induced the ARE-dependent luciferase activity and in many cases this response was paralleled by an induction of QR activity in Hepa1C1C7 cells. Sixty percent of the weak sensitizers also induced luciferase activity, and the overall accuracy of the assay was 83 percent. Only four of 30 tested nonsensitizers induced low levels of luciferase activity, indicating a high specificity of the assay. Thus, measurement of the induction of this signaling pathway provides an interesting in vitro test to screen for the skin sensitization potential of novel chemicals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17932397     DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  25 in total

Review 1.  T-cell recognition of chemicals, protein allergens and drugs: towards the development of in vitro assays.

Authors:  Stefan F Martin; Philipp R Esser; Sonja Schmucker; Lisa Dietz; Dean J Naisbitt; B Kevin Park; Marc Vocanson; Jean-Francois Nicolas; Monika Keller; Werner J Pichler; Matthias Peiser; Andreas Luch; Reinhard Wanner; Enrico Maggi; Andrea Cavani; Thomas Rustemeyer; Anne Richter; Hermann-Josef Thierse; Federica Sallusto
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 9.261

2.  Predicting the future: opportunities and challenges for the chemical industry to apply 21st-century toxicity testing.

Authors:  Raja S Settivari; Nicholas Ball; Lynea Murphy; Reza Rasoulpour; Darrell R Boverhof; Edward W Carney
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 3.  Application of proteomics in the elucidation of chemical-mediated allergic contact dermatitis.

Authors:  Tessa Höper; Franz Mussotter; Andrea Haase; Andreas Luch; Tewes Tralau
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 4.  Skin and respiratory chemical allergy: confluence and divergence in a hybrid adverse outcome pathway.

Authors:  Ian Kimber; Alan Poole; David A Basketter
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 5.  Metal nanomaterials: Immune effects and implications of physicochemical properties on sensitization, elicitation, and exacerbation of allergic disease.

Authors:  Katherine A Roach; Aleksandr B Stefaniak; Jenny R Roberts
Journal:  J Immunotoxicol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Development and validation of a new in vitro assay designed to measure contact allergen-triggered oxidative stress in dendritic cells.

Authors:  Masaaki Miyazawa; Akira Takashima
Journal:  J Dermatol Sci       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 4.563

7.  Screening of natural compounds as activators of the keap1-nrf2 pathway.

Authors:  Kai C Wu; Peter R McDonald; Jie Liu; Curtis D Klaassen
Journal:  Planta Med       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; Qingda Zang; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Michael Paris; David M Lehmann; Neepa Choksi; Joanna Matheson; Abigail Jacobs; Anna Lowit; David Allen; Warren Casey
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.446

9.  Lack of the purinergic receptor P2X(7) results in resistance to contact hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Felix C Weber; Philipp R Esser; Tobias Müller; Jayanthi Ganesan; Patrizia Pellegatti; Markus M Simon; Robert Zeiser; Marco Idzko; Thilo Jakob; Stefan F Martin
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 14.307

10.  Perspectives on Non-Animal Alternatives for Assessing Sensitization Potential in Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Authors:  Nripen S Sharma; Rohit Jindal; Bhaskar Mitra; Serom Lee; Lulu Li; Tim J Maguire; Rene Schloss; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.