Literature DB >> 30377734

Skin sensitization testing needs and data uses by US regulatory and research agencies.

Judy Strickland1, Amber B Daniel2, David Allen2, Cecilia Aguila3, Surender Ahir4, Simona Bancos5, Evisabel Craig6, Dori Germolec7, Chandramallika Ghosh5, Naomi L Hudson8, Abigail Jacobs9, David M Lehmann10, Joanna Matheson11, Emily N Reinke12, Nakissa Sadrieh13, Stanislav Vukmanovic13, Nicole Kleinstreuer14.   

Abstract

United States regulatory and research agencies may rely upon skin sensitization test data to assess the sensitization hazards associated with dermal exposure to chemicals and products. These data are evaluated to ensure that such substances will not cause unreasonable adverse effects to human health when used appropriately. The US Consumer Product Safety Commission, the US Environmental Protection Agency, the US Food and Drug Administration, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, and the US Department of Defense are member agencies of the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM). ICCVAM seeks to identify opportunities for the use of non-animal replacements to satisfy these testing needs and requirements. This review identifies the standards, test guidelines, or guidance documents that are applicable to satisfy each of these agency's needs; the current use of animal testing and flexibility for using alternative methodologies; information needed from alternative tests to fulfill the needs for skin sensitization data; and whether data from non-animal alternative approaches are accepted by these US federal agencies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative approaches; Non-animal methods; Regulatory requirements; Skin sensitization testing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30377734      PMCID: PMC6363849          DOI: 10.1007/s00204-018-2341-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  8 in total

1.  Application of the KeratinoSens™ assay for assessing the skin sensitization potential of agrochemical active ingredients and formulations.

Authors:  Raja S Settivari; Sean C Gehen; Ricardo Acosta Amado; Nicolo R Visconti; Darrell R Boverhof; Edward W Carney
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  In vitro assessment of skin sensitization, photosensitization and phototoxicity potential of commercial glyphosate-containing formulations.

Authors:  Renato Ivan de Ávila; Gabriel Campos Teixeira; Danillo Fabrini Maciel Costa Veloso; Larissa Cleres Moreira; Eliana Martins Lima; Marize Campos Valadares
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 3.  International regulatory requirements for skin sensitization testing.

Authors:  Amber B Daniel; Judy Strickland; David Allen; Silvia Casati; Valérie Zuang; João Barroso; Maurice Whelan; M J Régimbald-Krnel; Hajime Kojima; Akiyoshi Nishikawa; Hye-Kyung Park; Jong Kwon Lee; Tae Sung Kim; Isabella Delgado; Ludmila Rios; Ying Yang; Gangli Wang; Nicole Kleinstreuer
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Integrated decision strategies for skin sensitization hazard.

Authors:  Judy Strickland; Qingda Zang; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Michael Paris; David M Lehmann; Neepa Choksi; Joanna Matheson; Abigail Jacobs; Anna Lowit; David Allen; Warren Casey
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.446

Review 5.  Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (II): an assessment of defined approaches *.

Authors:  Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Sebastian Hoffmann; Nathalie Alépée; David Allen; Takao Ashikaga; Warren Casey; Elodie Clouet; Magalie Cluzel; Bertrand Desprez; Nichola Gellatly; Carsten Göbel; Petra S Kern; Martina Klaric; Jochen Kühnl; Silvia Martinozzi-Teissier; Karsten Mewes; Masaaki Miyazawa; Judy Strickland; Erwin van Vliet; Qingda Zang; Dirk Petersohn
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.635

6.  Integrated Testing Strategies (ITS) for safety assessment.

Authors:  Costanza Rovida; Nathalie Alépée; Anne M Api; David A Basketter; Frédéric Y Bois; Francesca Caloni; Emanuela Corsini; Mardas Daneshian; Chantra Eskes; Janine Ezendam; Horst Fuchs; Patrick Hayden; Christa Hegele-Hartung; Sebastian Hoffmann; Bruno Hubesch; Miriam N Jacobs; Joanna Jaworska; André Kleensang; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Jon Lalko; Robert Landsiedel; Frédéric Lebreux; Thomas Luechtefeld; Monica Locatelli; Annette Mehling; Andreas Natsch; Jonathan W Pitchford; Donald Prater; Pilar Prieto; Andreas Schepky; Gerrit Schüürmann; Lena Smirnova; Colleen Toole; Erwin van Vliet; Dirk Weisensee; Thomas Hartung
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 6.043

7.  Standardisation of defined approaches for skin sensitisation testing to support regulatory use and international adoption: position of the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods.

Authors:  S Casati; K Aschberger; J Barroso; W Casey; I Delgado; T S Kim; N Kleinstreuer; H Kojima; J K Lee; A Lowit; H K Park; M J Régimbald-Krnel; J Strickland; M Whelan; Y Yang; Valérie Zuang
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Advances in the Development and Validation of Test Methods in the United States.

Authors:  Warren M Casey
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2016-01-31
  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory Techniques for Identifying Causes of Allergic Dermatitis.

Authors:  Itai Chipinda; Stacey E Anderson; Paul D Siegel
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.479

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.