Literature DB >> 2683814

Breast cancer screening legislation in the United States.

G B Thompson1, L G Kessler, L P Boss.   

Abstract

We discuss some of the issues emerging from a powerful legislative movement for preventive services over the past three years. During this time an increasing number of states passed, considered, or are currently developing breast cancer screening legislation. Most of these laws require some form of third party payment for mammography or establish breast cancer screening programs. The legislation varies markedly with regard to periodicity of examinations, ages covered, type and extent of third party coverage, dosage regulation, and radiographic equipment standards. This shows a need for common standards. Legislation provides an essential incentive for a public health response to a serious problem, but more than laws are needed. Health care providers and the general public need to be aware and take advantage of the coverage provided as a result of legislation. Moreover, public health officials need to be aware that such legislation may lead to a demand for services that exceeds present capacity to deliver them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2683814      PMCID: PMC1349810          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.79.11.1541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  11 in total

1.  Using mammography for cancer control: an unrealized potential.

Authors:  J Howard
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Mammography screening: published guidelines and actual practice.

Authors:  S A Feig
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  1987

3.  Provisional estimates from the National Health Interview Survey Supplement on Cancer Control--United States, January-March 1987.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1988-07-15       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 4.  Is screening mammography routinely indicated for women between 40 and 50 years of age? An affirmative view.

Authors:  G D Dodd
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 0.493

5.  Evaluation of recent trends in cancer mortality and incidence among blacks.

Authors:  K M Bang; J E White; B L Gause; L D Leffall
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1988-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Selection, follow-up, and analysis in the Health Insurance Plan Study: a randomized trial with breast cancer screening.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1985-05

7.  Breast cancer missed by mammography.

Authors:  J E Martin; M Moskowitz; J R Milbrath
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the Health Insurance Plan clinical trial.

Authors:  K C Chu; C R Smart; R E Tarone
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1988-09-21       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

Authors:  L Tabár; C J Fagerberg; A Gad; L Baldetorp; L H Holmberg; O Gröntoft; U Ljungquist; B Lundström; J C Månson; G Eklund
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The value of mammography screening in women under age 50 years.

Authors:  D M Eddy; V Hasselblad; W McGivney; W Hendee
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-03-11       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  6 in total

1.  Promoting participation in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  J G Zapka
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Mammography screening: how important is cost as a barrier to use?

Authors:  N Urban; G L Anderson; S Peacock
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Colorectal cancer screening participation: comparisons with mammography and prostate-specific antigen screening.

Authors:  S Lemon; J Zapka; E Puleo; R Luckmann; L Chasan-Taber
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Factors associated with the use of screening mammography in a primary care setting.

Authors:  R E Schoen; M Marcus; R L Braham
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1994-08

5.  Legislative interventions to increase access to screening mammography.

Authors:  M M McKinney; K M Marconi
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1992-12

6.  Identifying geographic disparities in the early detection of breast cancer using a geographic information system.

Authors:  Jane A McElroy; Patrick L Remington; Ronald E Gangnon; Luxme Hariharan; LeAnn D Andersen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.