Literature DB >> 7929885

Factors associated with the use of screening mammography in a primary care setting.

R E Schoen1, M Marcus, R L Braham.   

Abstract

Despite consensus recommendations the use of screening mammography remains low. We examined physician and patient related variables associated with requests to undergo screening mammography in a primary care setting, in order to assess current barriers to screening mammography at the level of the physician-patient interaction. A sample of 261 women over the age of 50, whose primary care was provided by resident physicians in a large, urban, academic medical center were examined. Data concerning patients and physicians demographic and clinical characteristics were abstracted. The data were analyzed by Chi-square and stepwise logistic regression. Forty-five percent of the patients were offered screening mammography within the study year and 53% were offered mammography over the preceding two years. Variables significantly associated with a request for screening included a previous history of breast disease (p < .001) and the severity of the patient's overall medical condition. Patients with an overall medical condition rated as mild were more likely to be requested to undergo screening than patients rated as moderately or severely ill (p < .01). Patients with higher educational levels were also more likely to be offered screening (P = .06). First year postgraduate (PGY 1) physicians requested more mammograms than PGY 2 or PGY 3 physicians (P < .05). A multivariable model utilizing logistic regression confirmed the association of the significant variables above with screening requests. Physicians were more likely to request mammography in patients at higher risk for developing breast cancer and less likely to request it in patients who had co-morbid illness. Increasing physician understanding of the importance and benefits of mammography and further investigation of strategies to ensure physician compliance with mammography recommendations are necessary to increase utilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7929885     DOI: 10.1007/bf02260384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  41 in total

1.  Differences in physician prevention practice patterns for white and minority patients.

Authors:  D H Gemson; J Elinson; P Messeri
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1988

2.  Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Results from a new national survey.

Authors:  R A Hayward; M F Shapiro; H E Freeman; C R Corey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1988-05

3.  Mammography before age 50 years?

Authors:  J C Bailar
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-03-11       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Trends in screening mammograms for women 50 years of age and older--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1987.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1989-03-10       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  State-to-state variation in screening mammograms for women 50 years of age and older--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1987.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1989-03-17       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 6.  US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer with breast self-examination. A critical review.

Authors:  M S O'Malley; S W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-04-24       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The periodic health examination: comparison of recommendations and internists' performance.

Authors:  F J Romm; S W Fletcher; B S Hulka
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 0.954

8.  Preventive content of adult primary care: do generalists and subspecialists differ?

Authors:  A J Dietrich; H Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Survey of physicians' attitudes and practices in early cancer detection.

Authors: 
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1985 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Improving the utilization of screening mammography in primary care practices.

Authors:  A B Nattinger; R J Panzer; J Janus
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1989-09
View more
  10 in total

1.  Health insurance and mammography: would a Medicare buy-in take us to universal screening?

Authors:  Donald H Taylor; Lynn Van Scoyoc; Sarah Tropman Hawley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Rural Residents' Perspectives on Multiple Morbidity Management and Disease Prevention.

Authors:  Shoshana H Bardach; Nancy E Schoenberg; Yelena N Tarasenko; Steven T Fleming
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2011-12

3.  The primary care pathway to mammography: a long and winding road.

Authors:  R C Burack
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Prevalence of colorectal cancer screening among a multimorbid rural Appalachian population.

Authors:  Steven T Fleming; Nancy E Schoenberg; Yelena N Tarasenko; Kevin A Pearce
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 0.954

5.  Age-related disparities in cancer screening: analysis of 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data.

Authors:  Anthony F Jerant; Peter Franks; J Elizabeth Jackson; Mark P Doescher
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Patients with multiple chronic conditions do not receive lower quality of preventive care.

Authors:  SeungJin Bae; Meredith B Rosenthal
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Method of detection of breast cancer in low-income women.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Allison Diamant; Lalima Hoq; Rose Maly
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  The association of type and number of chronic diseases with breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Betty Y Liu; Jean O'Malley; Motomi Mori; Lyle J Fagnan; David Lieberman; Cynthia D Morris; David I Buckley; John D Heintzman; Patricia A Carney
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.657

9.  Chronic disease as a barrier to breast and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  C I Kiefe; E Funkhouser; M N Fouad; D S May
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Do physician communication skills influence screening mammography utilization?

Authors:  Ari-Nareg Meguerditchian; Dale Dauphinee; Nadyne Girard; Tewodros Eguale; Kristen Riedel; André Jacques; Sarkis Meterissian; David L Buckeridge; Michal Abrahamowicz; Robyn Tamblyn
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.