Literature DB >> 2858707

Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare.

L Tabár, C J Fagerberg, A Gad, L Baldetorp, L H Holmberg, O Gröntoft, U Ljungquist, B Lundström, J C Månson, G Eklund.   

Abstract

A randomised controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of mass screening with single-view mammography in reducing mortality from breast cancer was started in Sweden in 1977. 162 981 women aged 40 years or more and living in the counties of Kopparberg and Ostergötland were enrolled in the study and divided at random into 2 groups. Each woman in the study group was offered screening every 2 or 3 years depending on age. Women in the control group were not offered screening. This report is confined to the 134 867 women aged 40-74 years at date of entry. The results to the end of 1984 show a 31% reduction in mortality from breast cancer and a 25% reduction in the rate of stage II or more advanced breast cancers in the group invited to screening. 7 years after the start of the study the excess of stage I cancers in the study group largely outweighs the deficit of advanced cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2858707     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92204-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  317 in total

1.  Criticisms of Swedish mammography trials were wrong.

Authors:  L Tabar; S W Duffy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-20

2.  Scientific foundation of mammographic screening is based on inconclusive research in Sweden.

Authors:  G Sjönell; L Stâhle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-07-03

3.  Mammography in New Hampshire: characteristics of the women and the exams they receive.

Authors:  P A Carney; M E Goodrich; D M O'Mahony; A N Tosteson; M S Eliassen; S P Poplack; S Birnbaum; B G Harwood; K A Burgess; B T Berube; W S Wells; J P Ball; M M Stevens
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-06

4.  How effective is screening for breast cancer?

Authors:  L Nyström
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-16

5.  Breast and cervical cancer screening: sociodemographic predictors among White, Black, and Hispanic women.

Authors:  Elizabeth Selvin; Kate M Brett
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Management of breast cancer: what do I tell the patient?

Authors:  C J Wright
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Breast cancer screening: who should be included?

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Implementation of cancer prevention guidelines in clinical practice.

Authors:  S J McPhee; J A Bird
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast: Is Breast Conserving Treatment Feasible?

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1996-06-28       Impact factor: 4.239

10.  The Stockholm breast cancer screening trial--5-year results and stage at discovery.

Authors:  J Frisell; G Eklund; L Hellström; U Glas; A Somell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.