Literature DB >> 3123720

The value of mammography screening in women under age 50 years.

D M Eddy1, V Hasselblad, W McGivney, W Hendee.   

Abstract

Two quantitative methods, Confidence Profiles and CAN*TROL, are used to analyze evidence and estimate the health and economic consequences of adding annual mammography to annual breast physical examinations in asymptomatic women aged 40 to 49 years who are at average risk for breast cancer. Such women have about a 128 in 10,000 chance of having breast cancer in the next ten years and about an 82 in 10,000 chance of dying of such a cancer. Adding annual mammograms to annual breast physical examinations each year during that age decade would reduce the probability of death to about 60 in 10,000, a reduction of about 26%. Screening would increase the expected lifetime of a woman destined to get breast cancer between ages 40 and 49 years by about 3.5 years. Ten years of screening with mammography in that age decade carries a risk of radiation-induced cancer of about one in 25,000 and a risk of a surgery recommendation for a lesion that is not cancer of about one in ten. If 25% of the women in this age group in the United States were screened every year, breast cancer mortality in the year 2000 would be decreased by about 373 deaths. In 1984 dollars, the cost of screening, workups, and continuing care in the year 2000 would be about $408 million. Treatment costs would be decreased by about $6 million, leaving a net increase in costs in the year 2000 of approximately $402 million (1984 dollars).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3123720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  31 in total

1.  Breast cancer screening: who should be included?

Authors:  A B Miller
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Choosing quality of care measures based on the expected impact of improved care on health.

Authors:  A L Siu; E A McGlynn; H Morgenstern; M H Beers; D M Carlisle; E B Keeler; J Beloff; K Curtin; J Leaning; B C Perry
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Access to cancer screening services for women.

Authors:  B Kirkman-Liff; J J Kronenfeld
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Early detection of breast cancer: mammography.

Authors:  C J D'Orsi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Reducing deaths from breast cancer in Canada.

Authors:  I S Simor; R A Jong
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1990-02-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  The mammography and prostate-specific antigen controversies: implications for patient-physician encounters and public policy.

Authors:  A S Brett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Health Promotion: Whose job is it?

Authors:  R Wilson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 8.  Outcomes research and cost-effectiveness analysis in radiology.

Authors:  M G Hunink
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Health Belief Model variables as predictors of screening mammography utilization.

Authors:  R B Hyman; S Baker; R Ephraim; A Moadel; J Philip
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  1994-08

10.  Method of detection of breast cancer in low-income women.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Allison Diamant; Lalima Hoq; Rose Maly
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.681

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.