Literature DB >> 11499116

Colorectal cancer screening participation: comparisons with mammography and prostate-specific antigen screening.

S Lemon1, J Zapka, E Puleo, R Luckmann, L Chasan-Taber.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The relation of personal characteristics, health and lifestyle behaviors, and cancer screening practices to current colorectal cancer (CRC) screening was assessed and compared with those factors' relation to current mammography screening in women and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in men.
METHODS: A cross-sectional random-digit-dialed telephone survey of 954 Massachusetts residents aged 50 and older was conducted.
RESULTS: The overall prevalence of current CRC screening was 55.3%. Logistic regression results indicated that family history of CRC (odds ratio [OR] = 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02, 3.86), receiving a regular medical checkup (OR = 3.07; 95% CI = 2.00, 4.71), current screening by mammography in women and PSA in men (OR = 4.40; 95% CI = 2.94, 6.58), and vitamin supplement use (OR = 1.87; 95% CI = 1.27, 2.77) were significant predictors of CRC screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Health and lifestyle behaviors were related to increased current CRC, mammography, and PSA screening. Personal factors independently related to CRC screening were not consistent with those related to mammography and PSA screening. This lack of consistency may reflect different stages of adoption of each type of screening by clinicians and the public.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11499116      PMCID: PMC1446758          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.91.8.1264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  49 in total

1.  Trends in mammography use and their relation to physician and other factors.

Authors:  D S Lane; L S Caplan; R Grimson
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1996

2.  Mammography use among sociodemographically diverse women: the accuracy of self-report.

Authors:  J G Zapka; C Bigelow; T Hurley; L D Ford; J Egelhofer; W M Cloud; E Sachsse
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Colorectal cancer screening in Massachusetts: measuring compliance with current guidelines.

Authors:  S Erban; J Zapka; E Puleo; M Vickers-Lahti
Journal:  Eff Clin Pract       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

4.  Cancer statistics, 2000.

Authors:  R T Greenlee; T Murray; S Bolden; P A Wingo
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer.

Authors:  R A Smith; C J Mettlin; K J Davis; H Eyre
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  What people really know about their health insurance: a comparison of information obtained from individuals and their insurers.

Authors:  D E Nelson; B L Thompson; N J Davenport; L J Penaloza
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Smoking and cancer screening for women ages 42-75: associations in the 1990-1994 National Health Interview Surveys.

Authors:  W Rakowski; M A Clark; B Ehrich
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Use of prostate-specific antigen for prostate cancer screening in primary care practice.

Authors:  R B Williams; M Boles; R E Johnson
Journal:  Arch Fam Med       Date:  1995-04

9.  Double contrast enema and colonoscopy in polyp detection.

Authors:  F T Fork
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy and polypectomy. A case-control study of 32,702 veterans.

Authors:  A D Müller; A Sonnenberg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  41 in total

1.  A decade of research on disparities in Medicare utilization: lessons for the health and health care of vulnerable men.

Authors:  Marian E Gornick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Rates and predictors of colorectal cancer screening by race among motivated men participating in a Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment Program.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; Karen Ruth; Veda N Giri
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  A decade of research on disparities in medicare utilization: lessons for the health and health care of vulnerable men.

Authors:  Marian E Gornick
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Rates of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Ryan Zarychanski; Dhali Dhaliwal
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Colonoscopy screening in African Americans and Whites with affected first-degree relatives.

Authors:  Harvey J Murff; Neeraja B Peterson; Jay H Fowke; Margaret Hargreaves; Lisa B Signorello; Robert S Dittus; Wei Zheng; William J Blot
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-24

6.  The influence of health literacy on colorectal cancer screening knowledge, beliefs and behavior.

Authors:  Neeraja B Peterson; Kathleen A Dwyer; Shelagh A Mulvaney; Mary S Dietrich; Russell L Rothman
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.798

7.  Associations of race, education, and patterns of preventive service use with stage of cancer at time of diagnosis.

Authors:  Marian E Gornick; Paul W Eggers; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Colorectal cancer among Koreans living in South Korea versus California: incidence, mortality, and screening rates.

Authors:  So Yeon Ryu; Catherine M Crespi; Annette E Maxwell
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Increasing uptake of colorectal cancer screening in Korea: a population-based study.

Authors:  Kui Son Choi; Jae Kwan Jun; Hoo-Yeon Lee; Myung-Il Hahm; Jae Hwan Oh; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Colorectal cancer prevention for low-income, sociodemographically-diverse adults in public housing: baseline findings of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lorna H McNeill; Molly Coeling; Elaine Puleo; Elizabeth Gonzalez Suarez; Gary G Bennett; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.