Literature DB >> 107737

Breast cancer missed by mammography.

J E Martin, M Moskowitz, J R Milbrath.   

Abstract

Because a "negative" mammogram that is followed by a biopsy diagnostic of cancer is a matter of deep concern, a retrospective review was conducted of 48 such missed diagnoses at four Breast Cancer Detection Centers. The study group comprised 40,000 women participating in breast cancer screening examinations. From 3,271 biopsies during screening, 499 cancers had been found. Biopsies in the interval between screening examinations totaled 630 and yielded 48 malignancies. These 48 interval cancers were studied in an attempt to discover why they were not found on the preceding mammographic examination. Three major categories of error were disclosed and each is discussed: (1) poor radiographic technique; (2) absence of radiographic criteria of cancer; (3a) obvious oversight by the radiologist; and (3b) lack of recognition of subtle radiographic signs. This last reason is discussed in detail in the belief that better recognition of these indirect radiographic signs will lead to more accurate diagnoses, particularly in early cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 107737     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.132.5.737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  21 in total

1.  Evaluating palpable breast lumps with negative mammography.

Authors:  J H Leversee
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-02

2.  Ultrasonographic alterations associated with the dilatation of mammary ducts: feature analysis and BI-RADS assessment.

Authors:  Hsian-He Hsu; Jyh-Cherng Yu; Giu-Cheng Hsu; Wei-Chou Chang; Cheng-Ping Yu; Ho-Jui Tung; Ching Tzao; Guo-Shu Huang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  MRI patterns of invasive lobular cancer: T1 and T2 features.

Authors:  G Levrini; C A Mori; R Vacondio; G Borasi; F Nicoli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Breast cancer detection.

Authors:  D B Kopans
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1986-01

5.  Advances in breast cancer detection with screening mammography.

Authors:  J L Champaign; G J Cederbom
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2000-01

6.  Need for open access non-screening mammography in a hospital with a specialist breast clinic service.

Authors:  J J Curtin; M A Sampson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-02-29

7.  Assessment of malignancy potential in so-called interval mammary carcinomas.

Authors:  A von Rosen; K Erhardt; L Hellström; A Somell; G Auer
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  New modalities in breast imaging: digital mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M P Braeuning; E D Pisano
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Automatic assessment of scintmammographic images using a novelty filter.

Authors:  M Costa; L Moura
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

10.  Analysis of interval breast carcinomas in a randomized screening trial in Stockholm.

Authors:  J Frisell; G Eklund; L Hellström; A Somell
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.