Literature DB >> 8279611

Mammography screening: how important is cost as a barrier to use?

N Urban1, G L Anderson, S Peacock.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recent legislation will improve insurance coverage for screening mammography and effectively lower its cost to many women. Although cost has been cited as a barrier to use, evidence of the magnitude of its effect on use is limited.
METHODS: Mammography use in the past 2 years among women aged 50 to 75 residing in four suburban or rural counties in Washington State was estimated from 1989 survey data. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio of mammography use as a function of economic and other variables. Within a residential area, averages were used to measure the market price of mammography and the time cost to obtain a mammogram.
RESULTS: Use was lower among women who faced a higher net price or who preferred to obtain a mammogram during weekend or evening hours and higher among women with higher incomes. Visiting no doctor regularly and smoking were predictors of failure to use mammography.
CONCLUSION: The effects of economic variables on mammography use are important and stable across subsets of the population, but they are modest in size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8279611      PMCID: PMC1614899          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.84.1.50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  16 in total

1.  Utilization of screening mammography by primary care physicians.

Authors:  T J O'Leary; E S deParedes; J Tritschler; M Barr
Journal:  Appl Radiol       Date:  1989-12

2.  Doctors and their workshops. A review article.

Authors:  G Dionne; A P Contandriopoulos
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Projections of the breast cancer burden to U.S. women: 1990-2000.

Authors:  L G Kessler; E J Feuer; M L Brown
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Using mammography for cancer control: an unrealized potential.

Authors:  J Howard
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  S Shapiro; W Venet; P Strax; L Venet; R Roeser
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  The acceptance and completion of mammography by older black women.

Authors:  R C Burack; J Liang
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Factors influencing women's decision to undergo mammography.

Authors:  J Kruse; D M Phillips
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Personal costs incurred by women attending a mammographic screening programme.

Authors:  S F Hurley; P M Livingston
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1991-01-21       Impact factor: 7.738

9.  Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers.

Authors:  B K Rimer; M K Keintz; H B Kessler; P F Engstrom; J R Rosan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Demographic, clinical, and financial factors relating to the completion rate of screening mammography.

Authors:  R A Johnson; P J Murata
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1988
View more
  27 in total

1.  Trends in perceived cost as a barrier to medical care, 1991-1996.

Authors:  D E Nelson; B L Thompson; S D Bland; R Rubinson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  The association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation for mammography: who gets the message about breast cancer screening?

Authors:  M S O'Malley; J A Earp; S T Hawley; M J Schell; H F Mathews; J Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The relation of household income to mammography utilization in a prepaid health care system.

Authors:  M B Barton; S Moore; E Shtatland; R Bright
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Increasing screening mammography among immigrant and minority women in Canada: a review of past interventions.

Authors:  Nour Schoueri-Mychasiw; Sharon Campbell; Verna Mai
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2013-02

5.  The effect of Medicare reimbursement for screening mammography on utilization and payment. National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Screening Consortium.

Authors:  N Breen; E J Feuer; S Depuy; J Zapka
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Mammography using in a community-based sample of older women.

Authors:  J T Fullerton; D Kritz-Silverstein; G Robins Sadler; E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1996-03

7.  The effects of insurance coverage and ethnicity on mammography utilization in a postmenopausal population.

Authors:  R A Bush; R D Langer
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-04

8.  Mediating factors in the relationship between income and mammography use in low-income insured women.

Authors:  Alice N Park; Diana S M Buist; Jasmin A Tiro; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Do vouchers improve breast cancer screening rates? Results from a randomized trial.

Authors:  T J Stoner; B Dowd; W P Carr; G Maldonado; T R Church; J Mandel
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Knowledge, beliefs, attitudes, and cancer screening among inner-city African-American women.

Authors:  J F Sung; D S Blumenthal; R J Coates; E Alema-Mensah
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.798

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.