Literature DB >> 26775455

Birth Outcomes by Infertility Diagnosis Analyses of the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).

Barbara Luke, Judy E Stern, Milton Kotelchuck, Eugene R Declercq, Bruce Cohen, Hafsatou Diop.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy outcomes by infertility diagnosis. STUDY
DESIGN: ART data on women who were treated and gave birth in Massachusetts were linked to vital records and hospital utilization data. Live births were categorized by 8 mutually exclusive ART diagnoses. Risks of prematurity, low birthweight (LBW), small-for-gestational age (SGA), large-for-gestational age (LGA), pregnancy hypertension, gestational diabetes, prenatal hospitalizations, and primary cesarean delivery were modeled using logistic regression, adjusted for parental characteristics, treatment parameters, and plurality (adjusted odds ratios [AORs] and 95% confidence intervals); the reference group were pregnancies with the diagnosis of malefactor.
RESULTS: Among the 7,354 singleton and twin pregnancies, there were nonsignificant differences in the risks for LBW, SGA, or LGA. Significantly increased risks included gestational diabetes (ovulation disorders, AOR 1.80, 1.35-2.41), prematurity (ovulation disorders, AOR 1.36, 1.08-1.71; other factors, AOR 1.33, 1.05-1.67), prenatal hospital admissions (endometriosis, tubal and other factors, ovulation disorders, and uterine factors, AORs ranging from 1.66-2.68), and primary cesarean section (uterine factors, AOR 1.96, 1.15-3.36).
CONCLUSION: Although the infant outcomes of LBW, SGA, and LGA were generally similar across diagnosis groups, specific diagnoses had greater risks for prematurity, gestational diabetes, prenatal hospital utilization, and primary cesarean delivery. (J Reprod Med 2015;

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26775455      PMCID: PMC4734384     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  37 in total

1.  How should we report on perinatal outcome?

Authors:  Jolande A Land
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Perinatal outcomes of twin births conceived using assisted reproduction technology: a population-based study.

Authors:  Sheree L Boulet; Laura A Schieve; Angela Nannini; Cynthia Ferre; Owen Devine; Bruce Cohen; Zi Zhang; Victoria Wright; Maurizio Macaluso
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-05-16       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Assisted fertilization and breech delivery: risks and obstetric management.

Authors:  Liv Bente Romundstad; Pål R Romundstad; Arne Sunde; Vidar von Düring; Rolv Skjaerven; Lars J Vatten
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection.

Authors:  W Shih; D D Rushford; H Bourne; C Garrett; J C McBain; D L Healy; H W G Baker
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Perinatal outcome of singleton siblings born after assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception: Danish national sibling-cohort study.

Authors:  Anna-Karina Aaris Henningsen; Anja Pinborg; Øjvind Lidegaard; Christina Vestergaard; Julie Lyng Forman; Anders Nyboe Andersen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Accuracy of assisted reproductive technology information on the Massachusetts birth certificate, 1997-2000.

Authors:  Zi Zhang; Maurizio Macaluso; Bruce Cohen; Laura Schieve; Angela Nannini; Michael Chen; Victoria Wright
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2005.

Authors:  Victoria C Wright; Jeani Chang; Gary Jeng; Maurizio Macaluso
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2008-06-20

8.  Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Liv Bente Romundstad; Pål R Romundstad; Arne Sunde; Vidar von Düring; Rolv Skjaerven; David Gunnell; Lars J Vatten
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Gestational age estimates from singleton births conceived using assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  William M Callaghan; Laura A Schieve; Patricia M Dietz
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.980

10.  Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2006.

Authors:  Saswati Sunderam; Jeani Chang; Lisa Flowers; Aniket Kulkarni; Glenda Sentelle; Gary Jeng; Maurizio Macaluso
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2009-06-12
View more
  13 in total

1.  Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Early Autism Spectrum Disorders in Children Born to Fertile, Subfertile, and ART-Treated Women.

Authors:  Hafsatou Diop; Howard Cabral; Daksha Gopal; Xiaohui Cui; Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-11

3.  Risk of prematurity and infant morbidity and mortality by maternal fertility status and plurality.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; David B Seifer; Amy T Sparks; Paul C Lin; Kevin J Doody; Bradley J Van Voorhis; Logan G Spector
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations; the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Embryo banking among women diagnosed with cancer: a pilot population-based study in New York, Texas, and Illinois.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Logan G Spector; Judy E Stern; Yolanda R Smith; Melanie Williams; Lori Koch; Maria J Schymura
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Perinatal outcomes of singleton siblings: the effects of changing maternal fertility status.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Hafsatou Diop; Judy E Stern
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Hospitalizations up to 8 years following delivery in assisted reproductive technology-treated and subfertile women.

Authors:  Leslie V Farland; Chia-Ling Liu; Hafsatou Diop; Howard J Cabral; Stacey A Missmer; Charles C Coddington; Sunah S Hwang; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  Endometriosis and Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kjerstine Breintoft; Regitze Pinnerup; Tine Brink Henriksen; Dorte Rytter; Niels Uldbjerg; Axel Forman; Linn Håkonsen Arendt
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Endometriosis and Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors:  Leslie V Farland; Jennifer Prescott; Naoko Sasamoto; Deirdre K Tobias; Audrey J Gaskins; Jennifer J Stuart; Daniela A Carusi; Jorge E Chavarro; Andrew W Horne; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 7.623

10.  Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Endometriosis - Myths and Realities.

Authors:  Leslie V Farland; Samantha Davidson; Naoko Sasamoto; Andrew W Horne; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep       Date:  2020-01-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.