Literature DB >> 18487216

Perinatal outcomes of twin births conceived using assisted reproduction technology: a population-based study.

Sheree L Boulet1, Laura A Schieve, Angela Nannini, Cynthia Ferre, Owen Devine, Bruce Cohen, Zi Zhang, Victoria Wright, Maurizio Macaluso.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 18% of multiple births in the USA result from assisted reproduction technology (ART). Although many studies comparing ART and naturally conceived twins report no difference in risks for perinatal outcomes, others report slight to moderate positive or protective associations.
METHODS: We selected twin deliveries with and without indication of ART from Massachusetts live birth-infant death records from 1997 to 2000 linked to the US ART surveillance system. The sample was restricted to deliveries by mothers with increased socioeconomic status, private health insurance and intermediate/plus prenatal care use. Our final sample included 1446 and 2729 ART and non-ART twin deliveries, respectively. Odds ratios (OR) for associations between ART and perinatal outcomes were adjusted for maternal demographic factors, smoking, prenatal care and hospital care level.
RESULTS: ART twin deliveries were less likely than non-ART to be very preterm (adjusted OR 0.75; 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.97) or include a very low birthweight (<1500 g) infant (0.75; 0.58-0.95) or infant death (0.55; 0.35-0.88). In stratified analyses, these findings were observed among primiparous deliveries, but there were no risk differences among multiparous ART and non-ART twin deliveries.
CONCLUSIONS: ART treatment was not a risk factor for adverse perinatal outcome, and risks for several outcomes were somewhat lower among ART twin deliveries. Nonetheless, ART is strongly associated with twinning and twins remain a high-risk group, relative to singletons. Promoting singleton gestation in assisted conception is an important strategy for reducing adverse outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18487216     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  36 in total

1.  Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Barbara Luke; Candice Belanoff; Howard Cabral; Hafsatou Diop; Daksha Gopal; Lan Hoang; Milton Kotelchuck; Judy E Stern; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Assisted Reproductive Technology and Early Intervention Program Enrollment.

Authors:  Hafsatou Diop; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Candice Belanoff; Eugene R Declercq; Milton Kotelchuck; Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Number of embryos transferred after in vitro fertilization and good perinatal outcome.

Authors:  Dmitry M Kissin; Aniket D Kulkarni; Vitaly A Kushnir; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Neonatal outcomes among twins stratified by method of conception: secondary analysis of maternal fetal medicine (MFMU) network database.

Authors:  Jaimin S Shah; Susan Hosseini Nasab; Neil Chappell; Han-Yang Chen; Amy Schutt; Hector Mendez-Figueroa
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Effect of maternal chronic disease on obstetric complications in twin pregnancies in a United States cohort.

Authors:  Emily Werder; Pauline Mendola; Tuija Männistö; Jennifer O'Loughlin; S Katherine Laughon
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Calculating length of gestation from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) database versus vital records may alter reported rates of prematurity.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck; Barbara Luke; Eugene Declercq; Howard Cabral; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Validation of birth outcomes from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS): population-based analysis from the Massachusetts Outcome Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology (MOSART).

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Daksha Gopal; Rebecca F Liberman; Marlene Anderka; Milton Kotelchuck; Barbara Luke
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Factors associated with the use of elective single-embryo transfer and pregnancy outcomes in the United States, 2004-2012.

Authors:  Aaron K Styer; Barbara Luke; Wendy Vitek; Mindy S Christianson; Valerie L Baker; Alicia Y Christy; Alex J Polotsky
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Birth Outcomes by Infertility Diagnosis Analyses of the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck; Eugene R Declercq; Bruce Cohen; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 0.142

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.