Literature DB >> 28455086

Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations; the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Barbara Luke1, Daksha Gopal2, Howard Cabral2, Judy E Stern3, Hafsatou Diop4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether the risk of adverse outcomes in twin pregnancies among subfertile women, conceived with and without in vitro fertilization, differs from those conceived spontaneously.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the effects of fertility status on adverse perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies on a population basis. STUDY
DESIGN: All twin live births of ≥22 weeks' gestation and ≥350 g birthweight to Massachusetts resident women in 2004 through 2010 were linked to hospital discharge records, vital records, and in vitro fertilization cycles. Women were categorized by their fertility status as in vitro fertilization, subfertile, or fertile, and by twin pair genders (all, like, unlike). Women whose births linked to in vitro fertilization cycles were classified as in vitro fertilization; those with indicators of subfertility but without in vitro fertilization treatment were classified as subfertile; all others were classified as fertile. Risks of 6 adverse pregnancy outcomes (gestational diabetes, pregnancy hypertension, uterine bleeding, placental complications [placenta abruptio, placenta previa, and vasa previa], prenatal hospitalizations, and primary cesarean) and 9 adverse infant outcomes (very low birthweight, low birthweight, small-for-gestation birthweight, large-for-gestation birthweight, very preterm [<32 weeks], preterm, birth defects, neonatal death, and infant death) were modeled by fertility status with the fertile group as reference, using multivariate log binomial regression and reported as adjusted relative risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: The study population included 10,352 women with twin pregnancies (6090 fertile, 724 subfertile, and 3538 in vitro fertilization). Among all twins, the risks for all 6 adverse pregnancy outcomes were significantly increased for the subfertile and in vitro fertilization groups, with highest risks for uterine bleeding (adjusted relative risk ratios, 1.92 and 2.58, respectively) and placental complications (adjusted relative risk ratios, 2.07 and 1.83, respectively). Among all twins, the risks for those born to subfertile women were significantly increased for very preterm birth and neonatal and infant death (adjusted relative risk ratios, 1.36, 1.89, and 1.87, respectively). Risks were significantly increased among in vitro fertilization twins for very preterm birth, preterm birth, and birth defects (adjusted relative risk ratios, 1.28, 1.07, and 1.26, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Risks of all maternal and most infant adverse outcomes were increased for subfertile and in vitro fertilization twins. Among all twins, the highest risks were for uterine bleeding and placental complications for the subfertile and in vitro fertilization groups, and neonatal and infant death in the subfertile group. These findings provide further evidence supporting single embryo transfer and more cautious use of ovulation induction.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse pregnancy outcomes; assisted reproductive technology; infertility; like gender twins; subfertility; unlike gender twins

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28455086      PMCID: PMC5581271          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  88 in total

Review 1.  Anomalies of the placenta and umbilical cord in twin gestations.

Authors:  Corinne Hubinont; Liesbeth Lewi; Pierre Bernard; Etienne Marbaix; Frédéric Debiève; Eric Jauniaux
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Barbara Luke; Candice Belanoff; Howard Cabral; Hafsatou Diop; Daksha Gopal; Lan Hoang; Milton Kotelchuck; Judy E Stern; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection.

Authors:  W Shih; D D Rushford; H Bourne; C Garrett; J C McBain; D L Healy; H W G Baker
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-04-27       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 4.  First-trimester ultrasound determination of chorionicity in twin gestations using the lambda sign: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  G M Maruotti; G Saccone; M Morlando; P Martinelli
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.435

5.  Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used.

Authors:  Masako Hayashi; Akihito Nakai; Shoji Satoh; Yoshio Matsuda
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Adverse pregnancy outcomes after in vitro fertilization: effect of number of embryos transferred and plurality at conception.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Milton Kotelchuck; Eugene R Declercq; Mark D Hornstein; Daksha Gopal; Lan Hoang; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Natural versus induced twinning and pregnancy outcome: a Dutch nationwide survey of primiparous dizygotic twin deliveries.

Authors:  C B Lambalk; M van Hooff
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Pregnancy outcome among twins conceived after subfertility treatment compared with natural twins: A population-based study.

Authors:  Michael F G Murphy; Rachel E Neale; Kate Hey; Valerie A Seagroatt; Michael J Goldacre; Martin P Vessey; Bryony M Willis; J Douglas Ellis; David H Barlow
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.587

9.  Severe acute maternal morbidity in multiple pregnancies: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Tom Witteveen; Thomas Van Den Akker; Joost J Zwart; Kitty W Bloemenkamp; Jos Van Roosmalen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Body mass index--specific weight gains associated with optimal birth weights in twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Mary L Hediger; Clark Nugent; Roger B Newman; Jill G Mauldin; Frank R Witter; Mary Jo O'Sullivan
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 0.142

View more
  22 in total

1.  Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Anti-TNF Exposure in Utero, What About My Twins?

Authors:  Sunanda Kane; Brenda Becker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Birth outcomes of singleton vaginal deliveries to ART-treated, subfertile, and fertile primiparous women.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Chia-Ling Liu; Howard J Cabral; Elliott G Richards; Charles C Coddington; Sunah Hwang; Dmitry Dukhovny; Hafsatou Diop; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Factors associated with increased odds of cesarean delivery in ART pregnancies.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Chia-Ling Liu; Howard J Cabral; Elliott G Richards; Charles C Coddington; Stacey A Missmer; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Defining critical factors in multi-country studies of assisted reproductive technologies (ART): data from the US and UK health systems.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Barbara Luke; Katherine Cameron; Gary M Shaw; Allan A Pacey; Alastair G Sutcliffe; Carrie Williams; Julian Gardiner; Richard A Anderson; Valerie L Baker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Third grade academic achievement among children conceived with the use of in vitro fertilization: a population-based study in Texas.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Mary K Ethen; Mark A Canfield; Stephanie Watkins; Ethan Wantman; Kevin J Doody
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  In vitro fertilization alters phospholipid profiles in mouse placenta.

Authors:  Shuqiang Chen; Jun Wang; Ming Wang; Jie Lu; Yang Cai; Bo Li
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Risk of prematurity and infant morbidity and mortality by maternal fertility status and plurality.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; David B Seifer; Amy T Sparks; Paul C Lin; Kevin J Doody; Bradley J Van Voorhis; Logan G Spector
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Health of Infants After ART-Treated, Subfertile, and Fertile Deliveries.

Authors:  Sunah S Hwang; Dmitry Dukhovny; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Stacey Missmer; Hafsatou Diop; Eugene Declercq; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  [Influence of twin pregnancy by assisted reproductive technology on neonatal outcomes].

Authors:  Xiao-Hui Chen; Jin-Gai Zhu; Zhang-Bin Yu; Cheng-Yao Jiang; Shu-Ping Han
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.