Literature DB >> 28400311

Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Barbara Luke1, Daksha Gopal2, Howard Cabral2, Judy E Stern3, Hafsatou Diop4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Births to subfertile women, with and without infertility treatment, have been reported to have lower birthweights and shorter gestations, even when limited to singletons. It is unknown whether these decrements are due to parental characteristics or aspects of infertility treatment.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of maternal fertility status on the risk of pregnancy, birth, and infant complications. STUDY
DESIGN: All singleton live births of ≥22 weeks' gestation and ≥350 g birthweight to Massachusetts resident women in 2004-2010 were linked to hospital discharge and vital records. Women were categorized by their fertility status as in vitro fertilization, subfertile, or fertile. Women whose births linked to in vitro fertilization cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System were classified as in vitro fertilization. Women with indicators of subfertility but not treated with in vitro fertilization were classified as subfertile. Women without indicators of subfertility or in vitro fertilization treatment were classified as fertile. Risks of 15 adverse outcomes (gestational diabetes, pregnancy hypertension, antenatal bleeding, placental complications [placenta abruptio and placenta previa], prenatal hospitalizations, primary cesarean delivery, very low birthweight [<1500 g], low birthweight [<2500 g], small-for-gestation birthweight [z-score ≤-1.28], large-for-gestation birthweight [z-score ≥1.28], very preterm [<32 weeks], preterm [<37 weeks], birth defects, neonatal death [0-27 days], and infant death [0-364 days of life]) were modeled by fertility status with the fertile group as reference and the subfertile group as reference, using multivariate log binomial regression and reported as adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: The study population included 459,623 women (441,420 fertile, 8054 subfertile, and 10,149 in vitro fertilization). Women in the subfertile and in vitro fertilization groups were older than their fertile counterparts. Risks for 6 of 6 pregnancy outcomes and 6 of 9 infant outcomes were increased for the subfertile group, and 5 of 6 pregnancy outcomes and 7 of 9 infant outcomes were increased for the in vitro fertilization group. For 4 of the 6 pregnancy outcomes (uterine bleeding, placental complications, prenatal hospitalizations, and primary cesarean) and 2 of the infant outcomes (low birthweight and preterm) the risk was greater in the in vitro fertilization group, with nonoverlapping confidence intervals to the subfertile group, indicating a substantially higher risk among in vitro fertilization-treated women. The highest risks for the in vitro fertilization women were uterine bleeding (adjusted risk ratio, 3.80; 95% confidence interval, 3.31-4.36) and placental complications (adjusted risk ratio, 2.81; 95% confidence interval, 2.57-3.08), and for in vitro fertilization infants, very preterm birth (adjusted risk ratio, 2.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-2.52), and very low birthweight (adjusted risk ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.80-2.56). With subfertile women as reference, risks for the in vitro fertilization group were significantly increased for uterine bleeding, placental complications, prenatal hospitalizations, primary cesarean delivery, low and very low birthweight, and preterm and very preterm birth.
CONCLUSION: These analyses indicate that, compared with fertile women, subfertile and in vitro fertilization-treated women tend to be older, have more preexisting chronic conditions, and are at higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly uterine bleeding and placental complications. The greater risk in in vitro fertilization-treated women may reflect more severe infertility, more extensive underlying pathology, or other unfavorable factors not measured in this study.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adverse pregnancy outcomes; assisted reproductive technology; infertility; subfertility

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28400311      PMCID: PMC5581226          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  108 in total

1.  Assisted Reproductive Technology and Early Intervention Program Enrollment.

Authors:  Hafsatou Diop; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Candice Belanoff; Eugene R Declercq; Milton Kotelchuck; Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 2.  The longer-term health outcomes for children born as a result of IVF treatment: Part I--General health outcomes.

Authors:  Roger Hart; Robert J Norman
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 15.610

3.  Implications of assisted reproductive technologies on term singleton birth weight: an analysis of 25,777 children in the national assisted reproduction registry of Japan.

Authors:  Akira Nakashima; Ryuichiro Araki; Hirohiko Tani; Osamu Ishihara; Akira Kuwahara; Minoru Irahara; Yasunori Yoshimura; Takeshi Kuramoto; Hidekazu Saito; Aritoshi Nakaza; Tetsuro Sakumoto
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancies following assisted reproductive technology: a cohort study from the CoNARTaS group.

Authors:  S Opdahl; A A Henningsen; A Tiitinen; C Bergh; A Pinborg; P R Romundstad; U B Wennerholm; M Gissler; R Skjærven; L B Romundstad
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group.

Authors:  Ulla-Britt Wennerholm; Anna-Karina Aaris Henningsen; Liv Bente Romundstad; Christina Bergh; Anja Pinborg; Rolv Skjaerven; Julie Forman; Mika Gissler; Karl Gösta Nygren; Aila Tiitinen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used.

Authors:  Masako Hayashi; Akihito Nakai; Shoji Satoh; Yoshio Matsuda
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Neural tube defects associated with maternal periconceptional dietary intake of simple sugars and glycemic index.

Authors:  Gary M Shaw; Thu Quach; Verne Nelson; Suzan L Carmichael; Donna M Schaffer; Steve Selvin; Wei Yang
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 8.  Low birth weight: is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility?

Authors:  Laxmi A Kondapalli; Alfredo Perales-Puchalt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Body mass index--specific weight gains associated with optimal birth weights in twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Mary L Hediger; Clark Nugent; Roger B Newman; Jill G Mauldin; Frank R Witter; Mary Jo O'Sullivan
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 0.142

10.  Is the wrong question being asked in infertility research?

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern; Mark D Hornstein; Milton Kotelchuck; Hafsatou Diop; Howard Cabral; Eugene R Declercq
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 3.412

View more
  33 in total

1.  Birth outcomes of singleton vaginal deliveries to ART-treated, subfertile, and fertile primiparous women.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Chia-Ling Liu; Howard J Cabral; Elliott G Richards; Charles C Coddington; Sunah Hwang; Dmitry Dukhovny; Hafsatou Diop; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Factors associated with increased odds of cesarean delivery in ART pregnancies.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Chia-Ling Liu; Howard J Cabral; Elliott G Richards; Charles C Coddington; Stacey A Missmer; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Defining critical factors in multi-country studies of assisted reproductive technologies (ART): data from the US and UK health systems.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Barbara Luke; Katherine Cameron; Gary M Shaw; Allan A Pacey; Alastair G Sutcliffe; Carrie Williams; Julian Gardiner; Richard A Anderson; Valerie L Baker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Third grade academic achievement among children conceived with the use of in vitro fertilization: a population-based study in Texas.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Mary K Ethen; Mark A Canfield; Stephanie Watkins; Ethan Wantman; Kevin J Doody
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  In Vitro Fertilization Technology and Child Health.

Authors:  Michael von Wolff; Thomas Haaf
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Association between in vitro fertilization and ischemic placental disease by gestational age.

Authors:  Katherine M Johnson; Michele R Hacker; Kim Thornton; Brett C Young; Anna M Modest
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Contributions to prematurity of maternal health conditions, subfertility, and assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Chia-Ling Liu; Sunah S Hwang; Dmitry Dukhovny; Hafsatou Diop; Howard Cabral
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Risk of prematurity and infant morbidity and mortality by maternal fertility status and plurality.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; David B Seifer; Amy T Sparks; Paul C Lin; Kevin J Doody; Bradley J Van Voorhis; Logan G Spector
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Increased risk of severe maternal morbidity among infertile women: analysis of US claims data.

Authors:  Gayathree Murugappan; Shufeng Li; Ruth B Lathi; Valerie L Baker; Barbara Luke; Michael L Eisenberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Examination of fetal growth trajectories following infertility treatment.

Authors:  Melody Besharati; Frauke von Versen-Höynck; Kris Kapphahn; Valerie Lynn Baker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.