Literature DB >> 27318927

Perinatal outcomes of singleton siblings: the effects of changing maternal fertility status.

Barbara Luke1, Daksha Gopal2, Howard Cabral3, Hafsatou Diop4, Judy E Stern5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of changing fertility status on perinatal outcomes of singleton siblings, conceived with and without assisted reproductive technology (ART).
METHOD: A longitudinal cohort study of Massachusetts resident women having two consecutive singleton births during 2004-2010 was performed. Women were classified as ART (A), subfertile (S), or fertile (F) and categorized by their fertility status in each birth as A-A, A-S, S-A, S-S, F-A, F-S, and F-F. Within categories, adjusted mean birthweights, gestations, and birthweight Z scores were estimated with linear generalized estimating equations. Risks of low birthweight (LBW, <2500 g), preterm birth (PTB, <37 weeks), and placental complications were modeled using logistic regression by fertility status as adjusted odds ratios (AORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: Birthweights in second pregnancies averaged 74-155 g higher, except for births to F-A women, who averaged -16 g lower. Most women had a reduction in length of gestation in their second pregnancies, with F-A women having the largest decline (-0.5 weeks). In first birth models, the risks for LBW and placental complications were increased for subfertile (AOR 1.39 [1.07-1.81] and 1.97 [1.33-2.93], respectively) and ART women (AOR 1.58 [1.29-1.93] and 3.40 [2.64-4.37], respectively). Second birth models showed increased risks for ART births of LBW (AOR 3.13 [2.19-4.48]) and placental complications (AOR 2.45 [1.56-3.86]) and greater risks of PTB for both ART (AOR 2.37 [1.74-3.23]) and subfertile women (AOR 1.47 [1.02-2.13]).
CONCLUSIONS: Declining fertility status, with and without assisted reproductive technology treatment, is associated with increasing risks for adverse outcomes, greatest for women whose fertility status declined the most.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse pregnancy outcomes; Assisted reproductive technology; Fertile; Infertility; Subfertile

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27318927      PMCID: PMC5010815          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0757-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  52 in total

Review 1.  Pregnancy complications and maternal cardiovascular risk: opportunities for intervention and screening?

Authors:  Naveed Sattar; Ian A Greer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-07-20

2.  Maternal Postpartum Hospitalization Following Assisted Reproductive Technology Births.

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Judy E Stern; Barbara Luke; Howard Cabral; Daksha Gopal; Candice Belanoff; Hafsatou Diop; Milton Kotelchuck
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Perinatal outcomes associated with assisted reproductive technology: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technologies (MOSART).

Authors:  Eugene Declercq; Barbara Luke; Candice Belanoff; Howard Cabral; Hafsatou Diop; Daksha Gopal; Lan Hoang; Milton Kotelchuck; Judy E Stern; Mark D Hornstein
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Assisted Reproductive Technology and Early Intervention Program Enrollment.

Authors:  Hafsatou Diop; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Candice Belanoff; Eugene R Declercq; Milton Kotelchuck; Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Oocyte donation is an independent risk factor for pregnancy complications: the implications for women of advanced age.

Authors:  Johnny S Younis; Neri Laufer
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  Effect of maternal chronic disease on obstetric complications in twin pregnancies in a United States cohort.

Authors:  Emily Werder; Pauline Mendola; Tuija Männistö; Jennifer O'Loughlin; S Katherine Laughon
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 7.  Delayed childbearing: effects on fertility and the outcome of pregnancy.

Authors:  Juan Balasch; Eduard Gratacós
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 8.  Female age-related fertility decline. Committee Opinion No. 589.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 9.  Low birth weight: is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility?

Authors:  Laxmi A Kondapalli; Alfredo Perales-Puchalt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Maternal and neonatal health outcomes following assisted reproduction.

Authors:  A Farhi; B Reichman; V Boyko; A Hourvitz; R Ron-El; L Lerner-Geva
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.828

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Birth outcomes of singleton vaginal deliveries to ART-treated, subfertile, and fertile primiparous women.

Authors:  Judy E Stern; Chia-Ling Liu; Howard J Cabral; Elliott G Richards; Charles C Coddington; Sunah Hwang; Dmitry Dukhovny; Hafsatou Diop; Stacey A Missmer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Defining critical factors in multi-country studies of assisted reproductive technologies (ART): data from the US and UK health systems.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Barbara Luke; Katherine Cameron; Gary M Shaw; Allan A Pacey; Alastair G Sutcliffe; Carrie Williams; Julian Gardiner; Richard A Anderson; Valerie L Baker
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations; the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  The risk of birth defects with conception by ART.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Nina E Forestieri; Marilyn L Browne; Sarah C Fisher; Mahsa M Yazdy; Mary K Ethen; Mark A Canfield; Stephanie Watkins; Hazel B Nichols; Leslie V Farland; Sergio Oehninger; Kevin J Doody; Michael L Eisenberg; Valerie L Baker
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Analysis of the risk of complications during pregnancy in pregnant women with assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective study using registry linkage from 2013 to 2018 in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Mulan He; Xiaoxi Sun; Chunfang Wang; Yilun Sui
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 3.105

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.