Literature DB >> 18442997

Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection.

W Shih1, D D Rushford, H Bourne, C Garrett, J C McBain, D L Healy, H W G Baker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data show that differences exist in the birthweight of singletons after frozen embryo transfer (FET) compared with fresh transfer or gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT). Factors associated with low birthweight (LBW) after assisted reproduction technology (ART) were studied.
METHODS: Birthweight, distribution of birthweight, z-score, LBW (<2500 g), gestation and percentage preterm (<37 weeks) for singleton births >19 weeks gestation, conceived by ART or non-ART treatments (ovulation induction and artificial insemination) between 1978 and 2005 were analysed for one large Australian clinic.
RESULTS: For first births, the mean birthweight was significantly (P < 0.005) lower, and LBW and preterm birth more frequent for GIFT (mean = 3133 g, SD = 549, n = 109, LBW = 10.9% and preterm = 10.0%), IVF (3166, 676, 1615, 11.7, 12.5) and ICSI (3206, 697, 1472, 11.5, 11.9) than for FET (3352, 615, 2383, 6.5, 9.2) and non-ART conceptions (3341, 634, 940, 7.1, 8.6). Regression modelling showed ART treatment before 1993 and fresh embryo transfer were negatively related to birthweight after including other covariates: gestation, male sex, parity, birth defects, Caesarean section, perinatal death and socio-economic status.
CONCLUSIONS: Birthweights were lower and LBW rates higher after GIFT or fresh embryo transfer than after FET. Results for FET were similar to those for non-ART conceptions. This suggests IVF and ICSI laboratory procedures affecting the embryos are not causal but other factors operating in the woman, perhaps associated with oocyte collection itself, which affect endometrial receptivity, implantation or early pregnancy, may be responsible for LBW with ART.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18442997     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  53 in total

1.  Ovarian stimulation and low birth weight in newborns conceived through in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Suleena Kansal Kalra; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Christos Coutifaris; Thomas Molinaro; Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Comparison of early pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen and fresh embryo transfer in ART cycles.

Authors:  Abbas Aflatoonian; Fatemeh Mansoori Moghaddam; Mehri Mashayekhy; Farnaz Mohamadian
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Elevated progesterone and its impact on birth weight after fresh embryo transfers.

Authors:  Yetunde Ibrahim; Miriam J Haviland; Michele R Hacker; Alan S Penzias; Kim L Thornton; Denny Sakkas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Association of number of retrieved oocytes with live birth rate and birth weight: an analysis of 231,815 cycles of in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Valerie L Baker; Morton B Brown; Barbara Luke; Kirk P Conrad
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 6.  What is the contribution of embryo-endometrial asynchrony to implantation failure?

Authors:  Wan-Tinn Teh; John McBain; Peter Rogers
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Identifying women with indicators of subfertility in a statewide population database: operationalizing the missing link in assisted reproductive technology research.

Authors:  Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Hafsatou Diop; Daksha Gopal; Mark D Hornstein; Milton Kotelchuck; Barbara Luke; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  Low birth weight: is it related to assisted reproductive technology or underlying infertility?

Authors:  Laxmi A Kondapalli; Alfredo Perales-Puchalt
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Assisted reproductive technologies and perinatal morbidity: interrogating the association.

Authors:  Kurt T Barnhart
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Can prematurity risk in twin pregnancies after in vitro fertilization be predicted? A retrospective study.

Authors:  Andrea Weghofer; Katharina Klein; Maria Stammler-Safar; Christof Worda; David H Barad; Peter Husslein; Norbert Gleicher
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.